04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xvi-flares DEFICITS nc CEREAL GRAINS 32?<br />

Not<br />

phobsynlhesistnqwz-urfz-s")<br />

|2Q | | | I I I | | I<br />

l<br />

0s|2|e2430as424a54so<br />

Timfldoye em start <strong>of</strong> desiccutiml<br />

4. .\‘et photosynthesis du<strong>ri</strong>ng grain till in the maize desc<strong>ri</strong>bed in Fig. 2 <strong>and</strong> 3.<br />

Photosynthesis in the desiccated plants was virtually zero after the seventh day <strong>of</strong><br />

desiccation. Thus. the desiccated plants had a total <strong>of</strong> 16 days <strong>and</strong> the control<br />

plants had a total <strong>of</strong> 58 days <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis alter maximum pollen shed.<br />

concept. the reduced diffusion <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide through the stomata would<br />

limit photosynthesis because <strong>of</strong> the reduced amount <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide available<br />

for fixation by the chloroplasts. Although transpiration is affected by stomatal<br />

closure. the effect on photosynthesis cannot be predicted from correlations between<br />

transpiration <strong>and</strong> photosynthesis alone. There is little doubt that stomatal<br />

closure rest<strong>ri</strong>cts the entry <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide into the leaf. but the supply may<br />

or may not control the rate <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis depending on how severe stomatal<br />

closure is. An additional test <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> stomatal closure is required<br />

in this situation. This has recently been done by Boyer (197 la) who showed that<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis <strong>of</strong> sunflower leaves did not change when carbon<br />

dioxide levels were increased around the plant. despite the increased availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide to the cells within the leaf when this treatment was car<strong>ri</strong>ed<br />

out. IIe concluded that photosynthesis could not be limited by stomatal closure<br />

in this particular ease <strong>and</strong> suggested that changes at the chloroplast level probably<br />

accounted for the changes in photosynthetic activity. In a related study.<br />

Wardlaiv (1967) has shmvn that increased external carbon dioxide does not<br />

diminish the inhibition <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis du<strong>ri</strong>ng drought in wheat. Whether<br />

this is true for other species remains to be seen.<br />

Several investigators have demonstrated changes in chloroplast activity when<br />

chloroplasts are isolated from desiccated leaves (Nir <strong>and</strong> Poliak<strong>of</strong>f-Mayber.<br />

1967'. Boyer <strong>and</strong> Bowen. 1970'. Fry. 1970: Potter <strong>and</strong> Boyer. 1973; Keck <strong>and</strong><br />

Boyer, 1974). These changes involve a decrease in electron transport <strong>and</strong> photophosphorylatitin.<br />

<strong>and</strong> there are reports that carbon dioxide fixation by isolated<br />

chloroplasts is reduced (Plant. 1971; Plaut <strong>and</strong> Bravdo, 1973). The changes in<br />

electron transport have been demonstrated in viva (Boyer <strong>and</strong> Bowen. 1970;<br />

Boyer. 1971a. 1971b). <strong>and</strong> they parallel thc inhibition <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!