04.06.2016 Views

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

Vergara - 1976 - Physiological and morphological adaptability of ri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NITROGEN RESPONSE OF RICE IN 'I'ROPIC.»’\I. ("()NDI'I'I()NS 5I7<br />

Grub yield one)<br />

8<br />

on stAso/v .7 ncr ssasav<br />

Solar radiation<br />

IRZOI I6 I Kool/sqcml<br />

IRS (no.2 Kcot/sqcml<br />

Peta l I63 Kcol/sqem)<br />

2_<br />

‘a<br />

Solcrmdmim 1‘<br />

IRZOIZZZKrd/sqcni] ‘-, '1'--.,__<br />

RGIZIBKwI/sqcm} 1 ‘v<br />

Peta (216 Kml/sqeml<br />

Peto-"%_<br />

.'o,u"‘<br />

l | | | r t t t I<br />

Q%@9Q m|5o03o6090|20|50<br />

Nitroqanuppllodlhqlhul<br />

4. Effects <strong>of</strong> nitrogen levels on grain yield <strong>of</strong> 1R8. IR20.<br />

<strong>and</strong> Peta. IRRI. 1968-73. 1968 <strong>and</strong> 1969 dry seasons:<br />

0. 3D. 60. 90. <strong>and</strong> 120 kg N~'ha; I968 wet season: 0. 20.<br />

40. 60. <strong>and</strong> 80 kg Xilia; 1969 wet season: 0. 25. 50. 75.<br />

<strong>and</strong> I00 kg Nlha.<br />

Response to nitrogen was markedly dilTerent between the dry <strong>and</strong> wet seasons.<br />

The difference can be explained by the level <strong>of</strong> solar energy du<strong>ri</strong>ng these seasons.<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> plant type on nitrogen response W35 also obvious. Modern va<strong>ri</strong>eties,<br />

1R8 <strong>and</strong> IR20, consistently’ gave higher nitrogen response than Peta in any<br />

season <strong>and</strong> at all locations (Fig. 4 <strong>and</strong> 5).<br />

Between the drf; <strong>and</strong> wet seasons, however. response to nitrogen in 1R8 <strong>and</strong><br />

IRZU va<strong>ri</strong>ed from location to location’ ilhe va<strong>ri</strong>ation can he explained by reactions<br />

to diseases <strong>and</strong> insects<br />

At IRRI. there was less problem with disease in the dry season than in the<br />

wet season <strong>and</strong> as a result. nitrogen response <strong>of</strong> 1R8 <strong>and</strong> IRZU followed closely<br />

the yjield potential <strong>of</strong> these two va<strong>ri</strong>eties. IRZO gave higher response to N in the<br />

wet season because <strong>of</strong> higher disease <strong>and</strong> insect resistance than IRS (Fig. 4).<br />

Under disease-free conditions. such as in the drjv season in Maligaya <strong>and</strong> dry<br />

<strong>and</strong> wet seasons ill Bicol. nitrogen responses <strong>of</strong> IR8 were higher than those <strong>of</strong><br />

IR20, following the genetic potential <strong>of</strong>these xia<strong>ri</strong>eties (Fig. S). In the wet season.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!