30.08.2016 Views

G20 china_web

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sustainable development<br />

Possible economic gains from<br />

21.6<br />

meeting universal basic skills goal<br />

$27TN %<br />

Average amount of GDP used for<br />

social spending in 2014<br />

Jobs,<br />

wealth and individual<br />

well-being all depend on what people know<br />

and what they can do with that knowledge.<br />

There is no shortcut to equipping people<br />

with the right skills and providing them<br />

with the right opportunities to use their<br />

skills effectively. If there is one lesson the<br />

global economy has taught us over the last<br />

few years, it is that we cannot simply bail<br />

ourselves out of a crisis, we cannot solely<br />

stimulate ourselves out of a crisis and we<br />

cannot print money as a way out of a crisis.<br />

Most <strong>G20</strong> members can do better when<br />

it comes to equipping people with skills to<br />

collaborate, compete and connect in ways<br />

that lead to better jobs, better lives and drive<br />

our economies forward. If the United States<br />

were to ensure that all students meet the<br />

Sustainable Development Goal of universal<br />

basic skills, measured by the lowest<br />

level of proficiency in the Programme for<br />

International Student Assessment (PISA) of<br />

the Organisation for Economic Co-operation<br />

and Development (OECD), the economic<br />

gains could exceed $27 trillion in additional<br />

income for the American economy during<br />

the working life of these students.<br />

The OECD’s Survey of Adult Skills<br />

shows that poor skills severely limit<br />

people’s access to better paying and more<br />

rewarding jobs. It works the same way for<br />

countries. The distribution of skills has<br />

significant implications for how the benefits<br />

KEY TAKEAWAYS<br />

People need skills to collaborate,<br />

compete and connect<br />

Skills development is more effective<br />

that qualifications-focused education<br />

Every sector needs to foster skills<br />

development and entrepreneurship<br />

of economic growth are shared. Where<br />

large shares of adults have poor skills, it<br />

becomes difficult to introduce productivity<br />

enhancing technologies and new ways of<br />

working, which then stalls improvements<br />

in living standards.<br />

In all countries, adults with fewer<br />

skills are more likely to report poor health,<br />

perceive themselves as objects rather than<br />

actors in political processes and have less<br />

trust in others. Without the right skills,<br />

people languish on the margins of society,<br />

technological progress will not translate<br />

into economic growth and countries cannot<br />

compete in the global economy. Such<br />

competitiveness is particularly important<br />

for today’s youth, who cannot draw on<br />

experience and social networks the way<br />

older people can.<br />

Skills-oriented learning<br />

<strong>G20</strong> members need to better anticipate<br />

the evolution of demand for skills. The<br />

coexistence of unemployed graduates on<br />

the street and employers who say they<br />

cannot find the people with the skills they<br />

need shows clearly that more education<br />

does not automatically translate into better<br />

skills, better jobs and better lives.<br />

The dilemma for educators is that the<br />

skills that are easiest to teach and to test<br />

are also the skills that are easiest to digitise,<br />

automate and outsource.<br />

Countries need to put a greater premium<br />

on skills-oriented learning throughout<br />

life, instead of on qualifications-focused<br />

education that ends when the working<br />

life begins. Skills development is far more<br />

effective if the world of learning and the<br />

world of work are integrated. Compared<br />

to purely government-designed curricula<br />

taught exclusively in schools, learning in<br />

the workplace enables young people to<br />

develop ‘hard skills’ on modern equipment<br />

and ‘soft skills’, such as teamwork,<br />

communication and negotiation, all<br />

through real-world experience.<br />

Using such skills effectively explains<br />

a large part of labour productivity. It is<br />

another area where <strong>G20</strong> governments<br />

can do better. The lowest hanging<br />

fruit is telling young people more of the<br />

truth about the labour market outcomes<br />

of their educational choices and<br />

incentivising educational institutions<br />

to pay attention to it.<br />

Labour markets and learning<br />

High-quality career guidance services,<br />

complemented with up-to-date information<br />

about labour market prospects, can<br />

help young people make sound career<br />

choices. Ensuring that qualifications are<br />

more coherent and easy to interpret can<br />

also make a big difference. Continuous<br />

certification that incorporates non-formal<br />

and informal learning over the working<br />

life is essential, as is recognition of foreign<br />

diplomas. Labour market arrangements,<br />

including employment protection, can also<br />

facilitate or hinder the effective use of skills<br />

and address skill mismatches.<br />

Countries also need to maintain and<br />

expand the most effective active labourmarket<br />

measures, such as counselling,<br />

job-search assistance and temporary hiring<br />

subsidies for low-skilled youth. We need<br />

to link income support for young people to<br />

their search for work and their engagement<br />

in measures to improve their employability.<br />

None of this will work unless skills<br />

become everybody’s business. This<br />

includes governments, which design<br />

financial incentives and favourable tax<br />

policies; education systems, which foster<br />

entrepreneurship and relevant skills;<br />

employers, who invest in learning and<br />

make the most out of people’s skills; labour<br />

unions, which ensure that investments<br />

in training are reflected in better-quality<br />

jobs and higher salaries; and individuals,<br />

who can take better advantage of learning<br />

opportunities and shoulder more of the<br />

responsibility for learning. <strong>G20</strong><br />

154 <strong>G20</strong> China: The Hangzhou Summit • September 2016 G7<strong>G20</strong>.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!