30.08.2016 Views

G20 china_web

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strengthening the <strong>G20</strong> system<br />

23<br />

possible<br />

compliance catalysts<br />

within a commitment<br />

ONLINE<br />

Read <strong>G20</strong> compliance reports<br />

at www.g20.utoronto.ca<br />

KAYHAN OZER/ANADOLU AGENCY/GETTY IMAGES<br />

Caroline<br />

Bracht<br />

Co-director of Research<br />

<strong>G20</strong> Research Group<br />

macroeconomic policy commitments to<br />

a high degree. They also perform well<br />

on the two health commitments that are<br />

monitored. Their weakest performances<br />

are in the areas of crime and corruption,<br />

international cooperation, trade, climate<br />

change and development.<br />

Possible catalysts<br />

The <strong>G20</strong> Research Group has also analysed<br />

whether the presence or absence of<br />

compliance catalysts – words, phrases<br />

or factors that are embedded in and guide<br />

a commitment – increase the likelihood<br />

of compliance.<br />

There are 23 possible compliance<br />

catalysts that can appear within a<br />

commitment. At times, more than one does.<br />

We have found that a reference to a singleyear<br />

timetable in the text of the commitment<br />

has a positive effect on <strong>G20</strong> compliance.<br />

However, there are also catalysts that<br />

might interfere with compliance. Setting<br />

a distinct target or goal, identifying a<br />

specified agent or an actor through which<br />

the <strong>G20</strong> will work and identifying an<br />

international organisation other than the<br />

core international organisation for the<br />

issue all hinder compliance. Therefore,<br />

to potentially increase <strong>G20</strong> compliance,<br />

commitments should be crafted so they<br />

include a single-year timetable and avoid<br />

incorporating a set target or specified agent<br />

or secondary international organisation for<br />

that issue area.<br />

While the <strong>G20</strong>’s overall average<br />

compliance is moderately high, there is<br />

room for improvement – especially by<br />

the non-G7 members. Several countries<br />

have a long way to go to increase their<br />

implementation. Is their poor performance<br />

because of a lack of experience at summits?<br />

Or is it a lack of willingness to comply that<br />

hinders implementation?<br />

At the Hangzhou Summit, China holds<br />

the pen and has the potential to shape<br />

the narrative in a way that highlights the<br />

perspective of an emerging country. This<br />

may bode well for more implementation<br />

from other emerging economies by the time<br />

of the next summit, hosted by Germany in<br />

Hamburg, in 2017. <strong>G20</strong><br />

Caroline Bracht is Co-director of<br />

Research for the <strong>G20</strong> Research<br />

Group, the G7 Research Group, the<br />

BRICS Research Group and the<br />

Global Health Diplomacy Program,<br />

based at the Munk School of<br />

Global Affairs at Trinity College<br />

in the University of Toronto. She<br />

has researched and written on<br />

<strong>G20</strong>, G7/8 and BRICS compliance,<br />

specifically on development,<br />

climate change and energy<br />

commitments. She also leads the<br />

groups’ work on education, social<br />

policy, health and compliance.<br />

@CarolineBracht<br />

www.g20.utoronto.ca<br />

G7<strong>G20</strong>.com September 2016 • <strong>G20</strong> China: The Hangzhou Summit 239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!