G20 china_web
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Strengthening the <strong>G20</strong> system<br />
23<br />
possible<br />
compliance catalysts<br />
within a commitment<br />
ONLINE<br />
Read <strong>G20</strong> compliance reports<br />
at www.g20.utoronto.ca<br />
KAYHAN OZER/ANADOLU AGENCY/GETTY IMAGES<br />
Caroline<br />
Bracht<br />
Co-director of Research<br />
<strong>G20</strong> Research Group<br />
macroeconomic policy commitments to<br />
a high degree. They also perform well<br />
on the two health commitments that are<br />
monitored. Their weakest performances<br />
are in the areas of crime and corruption,<br />
international cooperation, trade, climate<br />
change and development.<br />
Possible catalysts<br />
The <strong>G20</strong> Research Group has also analysed<br />
whether the presence or absence of<br />
compliance catalysts – words, phrases<br />
or factors that are embedded in and guide<br />
a commitment – increase the likelihood<br />
of compliance.<br />
There are 23 possible compliance<br />
catalysts that can appear within a<br />
commitment. At times, more than one does.<br />
We have found that a reference to a singleyear<br />
timetable in the text of the commitment<br />
has a positive effect on <strong>G20</strong> compliance.<br />
However, there are also catalysts that<br />
might interfere with compliance. Setting<br />
a distinct target or goal, identifying a<br />
specified agent or an actor through which<br />
the <strong>G20</strong> will work and identifying an<br />
international organisation other than the<br />
core international organisation for the<br />
issue all hinder compliance. Therefore,<br />
to potentially increase <strong>G20</strong> compliance,<br />
commitments should be crafted so they<br />
include a single-year timetable and avoid<br />
incorporating a set target or specified agent<br />
or secondary international organisation for<br />
that issue area.<br />
While the <strong>G20</strong>’s overall average<br />
compliance is moderately high, there is<br />
room for improvement – especially by<br />
the non-G7 members. Several countries<br />
have a long way to go to increase their<br />
implementation. Is their poor performance<br />
because of a lack of experience at summits?<br />
Or is it a lack of willingness to comply that<br />
hinders implementation?<br />
At the Hangzhou Summit, China holds<br />
the pen and has the potential to shape<br />
the narrative in a way that highlights the<br />
perspective of an emerging country. This<br />
may bode well for more implementation<br />
from other emerging economies by the time<br />
of the next summit, hosted by Germany in<br />
Hamburg, in 2017. <strong>G20</strong><br />
Caroline Bracht is Co-director of<br />
Research for the <strong>G20</strong> Research<br />
Group, the G7 Research Group, the<br />
BRICS Research Group and the<br />
Global Health Diplomacy Program,<br />
based at the Munk School of<br />
Global Affairs at Trinity College<br />
in the University of Toronto. She<br />
has researched and written on<br />
<strong>G20</strong>, G7/8 and BRICS compliance,<br />
specifically on development,<br />
climate change and energy<br />
commitments. She also leads the<br />
groups’ work on education, social<br />
policy, health and compliance.<br />
@CarolineBracht<br />
www.g20.utoronto.ca<br />
G7<strong>G20</strong>.com September 2016 • <strong>G20</strong> China: The Hangzhou Summit 239