29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Share of Income Required to Purchase Employer-Sponsored<br />

Plan with Average Premium, 2008<br />

Share of Income<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Single<br />

Family of Four<br />

Figure 4-2<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500 600<br />

Income as Percent of Federal Poverty Level<br />

Source: KFF/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey; CEA calculations.<br />

insurance is excluded from payroll and income taxation. The Federal marginal<br />

tax rate on labor income averages around 35 percent, so for each dollar<br />

of compensation a family received in the form of health insurance instead of<br />

wages, the family saved 35 cents in Federal taxes, reducing the effective cost<br />

of that dollar of health insurance coverage to just 65 cents.3 This favorable<br />

tax treatment played a central role in making coverage affordable for many<br />

middle- and upper-middle class families.4<br />

However, the tax benefit for employer-sponsored coverage was inadequate<br />

to make coverage affordable for many low- and moderate-income<br />

families. As depicted in Panels A and B of Figure 4-3, the likelihood of having<br />

private insurance from any source fell sharply with income. Bipartisan<br />

efforts during the 1980s and 1990s had made significant progress in filling<br />

these gaps for low- and moderate-income children by broadening eligibility<br />

for Medicaid and creating the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).<br />

3 The Federal marginal tax rate reported here was estimated using data from Urban-Brookings<br />

Tax Policy Center Tables T13-0253 and T14-0091. States also generally exclude employerprovided<br />

health insurance coverage from taxation, so the value of the tax subsidy is somewhat<br />

larger than reported here.<br />

4 While this favorable tax treatment played an important role in making coverage affordable<br />

for many families, its unlimited nature also encouraged some employers to offer inefficient<br />

and overly generous plans. The ACA introduced a tax reform that maintains this tax benefit,<br />

but mitigates the inefficiencies created by its unlimited nature; this reform is discussed in the<br />

second half of the chapter.<br />

202 | Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!