29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1-12<br />

Growth in Real Costs for Employer-Based<br />

Family Coverage, 2000–2016<br />

Average Annual Percent Growth<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

5.6<br />

Total<br />

Premium<br />

7.2<br />

3.1 3.1 3.1<br />

Worker<br />

Contribution<br />

5.1 5.2 5.1<br />

Employer<br />

Contribution<br />

Premiums for Family Coverage<br />

1.5<br />

Worker<br />

Contribution<br />

+ Estimated<br />

Out-of-<br />

Pocket Cost<br />

2000–2010<br />

2010–2016<br />

2.4<br />

Total<br />

Premium<br />

+ Estimated<br />

Out-of-<br />

Pocket Cost<br />

Note: Out-of-pocket costs were estimated by first using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to<br />

estimate the out-of-pocket share in employer coverage for 2000–2014 and then applying that<br />

amount to the premium for each year to infer out-of-pocket spending. The out-of-pocket share for<br />

2015 and 2016 was assumed to match 2014. Inflation adjustments use the GDP price index. GDP<br />

price index for 2016 is a CBO projection.<br />

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Educational Trust Employer Health<br />

Benefits Survey; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Household Component; CEA calculations.<br />

Health care costs have grown exceptionally slowly since the ACA<br />

became law. Prices of health care goods and services have grown at a slower<br />

rate under the ACA than during any comparable period since these data<br />

began in 1959, and recent years have also seen exceptionally slow growth in<br />

per-enrollee spending in both public programs and private insurance. The<br />

reforms implemented in the ACA have made an important contribution to<br />

these trends. CBO estimates imply that the ACA has reduced the growth rate<br />

of per-beneficiary Medicare spending by 1.3 percentage points per year from<br />

2010 through 2016, and “spillover” effects of these reforms have subtracted<br />

an estimated 0.6 to 0.9 percentage points per year from the growth rate of<br />

per-enrollee private insurance spending over the same period. Moreover,<br />

there is reason to believe that the ACA has had systemic effects on trends in<br />

costs and quality that go beyond these estimates.<br />

Because of slow growth in costs in employer coverage, illustrated in<br />

Figure 1-12, the average costs for a family with employer-based coverage<br />

in 2016 were $4,400 below where they would have been had costs grown at<br />

their pace over the decade before the ACA became law. Similarly, the premium<br />

and cost sharing amounts incurred by the typical beneficiary enrolled<br />

in traditional Medicare in 2016 are about $700 below 2009 projections, even<br />

before accounting for reductions in cost sharing for prescription drugs due<br />

46 | Chapter 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!