29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet at the end of November<br />

2016 was $4.45 trillion—over five times its size at the end of 2006, largely<br />

reflecting several large-scale asset purchase programs (quantitative easing)<br />

from 2008 to 2014, which are estimated to have lowered long-term interest<br />

rates by about a percentage point (Ihrig et al. 2012; D’Amico et al. 2012;<br />

Engen, Laubach, and Reifschneider 2015).4 Since the conclusion of its largescale<br />

asset purchase program in 2014, however, the Federal Reserve’s asset<br />

holdings have remained at $4.4 trillion as maturing bonds were replaced<br />

with purchases of new issues.<br />

In recent years, FOMC participants have tended to lower their estimates<br />

of the longer-run level for the federal funds rate. As of September, the<br />

median of FOMC participants’ projections of the long-run federal funds rate<br />

was 2.9 percent, down from 3.5 percent in December 2015. The downward<br />

revisions are consistent with downward trends in long-term interest rates in<br />

U.S. and global financial markets.<br />

The natural rate of interest is the real interest rate that should prevail<br />

when the economy is producing at its long-run potential level and has<br />

attained full employment. Both cyclical factors (such as unconventional<br />

monetary policies, fiscal austerity measures, and private sector deleveraging)<br />

and structural factors (such as slowing productivity growth, changing<br />

demographics) could be contributing to the decline in the natural rate of<br />

interest.5 An interest-rate decline implies that monetary policy may now<br />

have less room to provide accommodation during recessions than in the past<br />

because it has less room to lower rates.6 In light of this, some have argued<br />

that stabilization policy could benefit from greater use of countercyclical fiscal<br />

policy and perhaps changes in the approach to monetary policy such as<br />

targeting nominal GDP or adopting a higher inflation target.7<br />

4 See Ihrig et al. (2012) for a discussion of how interest rates paid on excess reserves and<br />

overnight reverse repurchase agreement have replaced open market operations—the buying<br />

and selling of Treasury securities—as the way in which the Federal Reserve achieves its target<br />

policy rate.<br />

5 See CEA 2015d for a survey on the nature and sources of the decline in long-term interest<br />

rates.<br />

6 Yellen (2016b) has argued that a low equilibrium federal funds rate does not mean that the<br />

Federal Reserve’s current toolkit will be ineffective. She points out that a recent paper using<br />

simulations from a Federal Reserve model finds that forward guidance and asset purchases<br />

should be sufficient to combat most recessions “even if the average level of the federal funds<br />

rate in the future is only 3 percent.”<br />

7 See Williams (2016), Summers (2014), Yellen (2016b), Fischer (2016), Bernanke (2013),<br />

Goodfriend (2016).<br />

The Year in Review and the Years Ahead | 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!