29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

improvements will strengthen ACOs’ ability to achieve savings and their<br />

incentives to do so. Third, program rules for many APMs are structured so<br />

that the performance payments earned for any given level of gross savings<br />

will shrink over time, generating larger net savings to Medicare even if gross<br />

savings remain constant. Fourth, as discussed previously, a larger share of<br />

Medicare dollars are expected to flow through APMs in the coming years.<br />

Recent Trends in Health Care Quality<br />

The reforms implemented under this Administration were designed<br />

to improve the quality of care, not just reduce health care costs. Reducing<br />

costs in ways that worsen the quality of care will often reduce the total<br />

value generated by the health care sector. By contrast, reducing costs while<br />

maintaining or improving the quality of care, which the evidence presented<br />

at the beginning of this section of this chapter suggested is often possible,<br />

has the potential to greatly increase the total value generated by the health<br />

care sector.<br />

In practice, studying trends in health care quality is inherently more<br />

challenging than studying trends in health care costs. The essential information<br />

about health care costs can be captured in a few key pieces of data—the<br />

types of service used, the prices paid for those services, and the resulting total<br />

spending—and these same basic measures are applicable across all health<br />

care settings. By contrast, health care quality has many important dimensions,<br />

including a range of different aspects of patients’ experiences while<br />

receiving care and myriad health outcomes. Furthermore, the most relevant<br />

dimensions vary widely from one setting to another. As a result, indicators<br />

of health care quality are unavoidably less comprehensive than indicators<br />

of health care costs. In addition, whereas health care costs are measured<br />

in dollars and so can be readily aggregated and compared across domains,<br />

different dimensions of health care quality are measured in widely varying<br />

units, which makes aggregation effectively impossible.<br />

For both of these reasons, all-encompassing indicators of health care<br />

quality like those that exist for health care costs do not exist. However, quality<br />

measures that capture particular important dimensions of care do exist,<br />

and a few of these are discussed below. These measures indicate that recent<br />

years’ slow growth in health care costs has been accompanied by important<br />

improvements in health care quality, implying that ongoing changes in<br />

health care delivery system are not just reducing health care spending, but<br />

also increasing the total value that the health care system creates. Notably,<br />

these improvements in the quality of care appear to be attributable, at least<br />

in part, to reforms introduced by the ACA.<br />

Reforming the Health Care System | 285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!