29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(KFF 2016). Another fifth of traditional Medicare beneficiaries purchase<br />

individual Medigap coverage and so will see a portion of the cost sharing<br />

savings through lower cost sharing and a portion through lower premiums<br />

for their Medigap plan. Around three-fifths of traditional Medicare beneficiaries<br />

receive supplemental coverage through a State Medicaid program or<br />

a former employer. In these cases, a portion of the cost sharing savings may<br />

accrue to the sponsor of that supplemental coverage, although the extent to<br />

which that occurs will depend on each individual’s particular circumstances.<br />

Medicare beneficiaries will see savings in scenarios beyond those<br />

considered here. Beneficiaries enrolled in Part D of Medicare are seeing substantial<br />

additional cost sharing savings due to the combination of the ACA’s<br />

provisions closing the coverage gap, which were discussed earlier in this<br />

chapter, and lower-than-expected prescription drugs costs. Those amounts<br />

are not included here because cost sharing obligations vary among Part D<br />

plans, which makes quantifying these savings more challenging. Similarly,<br />

this analysis does not examine cost sharing obligations for Medicare<br />

Advantage enrollees because the structure of cost sharing obligations in<br />

Medicare Advantage varies from plan to plan. In general, however, lower<br />

health care costs will tend to reduce cost sharing obligations for Medicare<br />

Advantage enrollees as well.<br />

A Better Long-Term Fiscal Outlook<br />

Federal and State governments finance a substantial fraction of health<br />

care spending in the United States, primarily through the Medicare and<br />

Medicaid programs, so reductions in health care costs also generate major<br />

savings in the public sector. Indeed, in large part because of the ACA’s<br />

provisions reducing health care spending over the long term, the law has<br />

generated major improvements in the Federal Government’s fiscal outlook,<br />

as depicted in Figure 4-47. CBO estimates imply that the ACA will reduce<br />

deficits by more than $300 billion over the 2016-25 period (CBO 2015a).40<br />

Those savings grow rapidly over time and average 1 percent of GDP—<br />

around $3.5 trillion—over the subsequent decade.<br />

The slowdown in health care cost growth more broadly has led to<br />

additional large improvements in the fiscal outlook. Between August 2010<br />

and August 2016, CBO reduced its projection of net Medicare spending<br />

40 CBO (2015a) estimates how repealing the ACA would affect the deficit. CBO notes that the<br />

deficit increase due to ACA repeal is not exactly equal to the deficit reduction due to the ACA’s<br />

enactment. Most importantly, CBO assumes that, even if the ACA were repealed, reductions in<br />

Medicare payment rates that have already been implemented under the ACA would remain in<br />

place. CBO estimates that these payment rate reductions will generate savings of $160 billion<br />

over the 2016-2025 period. Thus, the estimates presented in Figure 4-47 likely understate the<br />

deficit reduction attributable to the ACA’s enactment.<br />

Reforming the Health Care System | 295

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!