29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

suggests that changes in the health care delivery system have played the<br />

predominant role in recent years’ slow health care spending growth. The<br />

next section discusses the important role that the ACA’s changes in medical<br />

provider payment have played in slowing health care spending growth, but<br />

the fact that health care spending had started slowing prior to the ACA’s<br />

passage, as documented in Figure 4-31, suggests that the ACA is not the<br />

only reason that health care spending growth has been slower during the<br />

post-ACA period than in the past. A pair of such factors is discussed below.<br />

The slower growth under the ACA relative to the preceding decade<br />

may, in part, reflect the removal of factors that put upward pressure on<br />

spending growth during years preceding the ACA, particularly during the<br />

early 2000s. The late 1990s and early 2000s saw a number of states pass<br />

laws that restricted the ability of private insurers to use a range of so-called<br />

“managed care” strategies, strategies that appear to have contributed to<br />

slower health care spending growth during the 1990s (Cutler, McClellan,<br />

and Newhouse 2000; Glied 2000). Recent economic research examining<br />

these state laws has concluded that they put substantial, but temporary<br />

upward pressure on health care spending in the years after they took effect<br />

(Pinkovskiy 2014). This may partially explain why health care spending<br />

growth under the ACA has been so much slower than the first half of the<br />

2000s, though it cannot explain why spending growth has been slower under<br />

the ACA than during the second half of the 2000s.<br />

Another possible explanation for why health care spending has grown<br />

more slowly in recent years is that the pace at which new medical technologies<br />

are being introduced has slowed. As noted earlier in this section,<br />

economists generally believe that the development of resource-intensive<br />

new medical technologies has been the main driver of the rapid growth in<br />

health care spending over the long term (Newhouse 1992; Cutler 2004). If<br />

these types of technologies are arriving at a slower pace than in the past, then<br />

that could explain why health care spending has grown at a slower pace.<br />

The trajectory of medical technology likely can account for much of<br />

the recent swings in prescription drug spending growth. As illustrated in<br />

Figure 4-41, per enrollee prescription drug spending in private insurance<br />

grew very slowly in the years both immediately before and after passage of<br />

the ACA after having grown quite rapidly in the early 2000s.29 Slow growth<br />

during this period appears to have resulted from a slew of patent expirations<br />

for blockbuster drugs that allowed less expensive generic versions of these<br />

29 Figure 4-41 focuses on private insurance because Medicare generally did not cover<br />

prescription drugs before 2006 and because, as noted previously, trends in per enrollee<br />

Medicaid spending are more difficult to interpret due to changes in the composition of<br />

program enrollment.<br />

280 | Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!