29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4-17<br />

Monthly Gain in Private-Sector Payroll Employment, 2008–2016<br />

Job Gain/Loss<br />

600,000<br />

400,000<br />

Nov-2016<br />

200,000<br />

0<br />

-200,000<br />

-400,000<br />

Twelve-Month<br />

Moving Average<br />

-600,000<br />

-800,000<br />

-1,000,000<br />

2008 2010 2012 2014 2016<br />

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics; CEA Calculations.<br />

that the ACA has not had the extreme negative effects on employment that<br />

many critics predicted. However, more rigorous evidence on the ACA’s<br />

effects on labor markets can be obtained by comparing labor market performance<br />

between states where the ACA’s coverage provisions were likely to<br />

have had larger or smaller impacts. One crude indicator of the scope of the<br />

effects of the ACA’s coverage provisions is simply the state’s uninsured rate<br />

in 2013; consistent with this, it is a strong predictor of the magnitude of a<br />

state’s coverage gains since 2013, as demonstrated in Figure 4-8. Comparing<br />

states with higher and lower uninsured rates in 2013 can therefore provide<br />

insight into the effect of the ACA’s coverage provisions on the labor market.<br />

Another useful indicator is whether the state has expanded Medicaid, which<br />

provides insight into the labor market effects of Medicaid expansion in<br />

particular.<br />

Figure 4-18 plots each state’s uninsured rate in 2013 against the<br />

change from 2013 to 2015 in the share of working-age individuals who are<br />

Reforming the Health Care System | 237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!