29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Risk Taking<br />

The Dodd-Frank Act took a number of steps to limit risky behavior<br />

by financial firms. One component dubbed “the Volcker Rule” is named for<br />

Former Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker. As required by Dodd-Frank,<br />

the SEC, CFTC and banking regulators finalized the Volcker Rule in 2013<br />

to restrict federally insured banking entities from engaging in proprietary<br />

trading or investing in or sponsoring private equity or hedge funds. As seen<br />

in Figure 6-11, activities related to trading and securities contributed to<br />

significant losses during the crisis. The Volcker Rule is meant to mitigate<br />

the moral hazard inherent in access to federally insured deposits by limiting<br />

high-risk-taking activities. Banks have until July 2017 to conform investments<br />

in, and relationships with, covered funds. In the meantime, banks are<br />

recording and reporting certain quantitative measurements to regulators,<br />

and divesting their proprietary positions, including those in hedge funds.<br />

Banking regulations typically require firms to meet a minimum ratio<br />

of capital to risk-weighted assets. A risk-weighting system assigns a weight<br />

to each asset or category of assets that reflects its relative risk. Figure 6-12<br />

shows a general decline in risk-weighted assets as a fraction of total assets,<br />

reflecting declining relative risk of bank assets over time. Both Basel 2.5,<br />

effective in January 2013, and Basel III, effective in January 2016, revised<br />

the risk-weighting methodology and are reflected in the Figure as discrete<br />

increases on these dates.<br />

The Dodd-Frank Act included several reforms of the Federal Deposit<br />

Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to better protect depositors and stabilize the<br />

financial system. First, it permanently raised the level of deposits insured for<br />

each depositor from $100,000 to $250,000 for each insured bank. Second, it<br />

altered the operation of deposit insurance. Since its founding in 1934, the<br />

FDIC has maintained a Deposit Insurance Fund, a pool of assets meant to<br />

prevent bank runs by insuring the deposits of member banks and finance<br />

the resolution of failed banks. The FDIC maintains funds in the Deposit<br />

Insurance Fund by charging insurance premiums, or assessments, to banks<br />

whose depositors it insures. Specifically, Dodd-Frank required two changes<br />

in the methodology for calculating these premiums that provided direct<br />

relief to small banks with more traditional business models by making large<br />

banks bear more of the costs of deposit insurance.<br />

The first change required by the Dodd-Frank Act expanded the<br />

deposit insurance assessment base. When this change took effect in spring<br />

2011, total assessments for small banks with less than $10 billion in assets<br />

fell by a third — an annualized decrease of almost $1.4 billion. The second<br />

change required by Dodd-Frank raised the minimum Designated Reserve<br />

Ratio—the Deposit Insurance Fund balance over total estimated insured<br />

Strengthening the Financial System | 379

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!