29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

will strain Federal fire suppression resources. In addition to these likely<br />

increases in expenditures, climate change is expected to reduce economic<br />

output and diminish Federal revenue. A recent report by the U.S. Office of<br />

Management and Budget projects that the combined detrimental impacts of<br />

climate change on Federal revenues and expenditures by 2100 could easily<br />

exceed $100 billion annually, when the estimates are expressed in terms of<br />

their equivalent percentage of current U.S. GDP (OMB 2016).<br />

Addressing Externalities<br />

The impacts of climate change present a clear economic rationale for<br />

policy as a means to both correct market failures and as a form of insurance<br />

against the increased risk of catastrophic events. Climate change reflects<br />

a classic environmental externality. When consumers or producers emit<br />

greenhouse gases, they enjoy the benefits from the services provided by<br />

the use of the fuels, while not paying the full costs of the damages from<br />

climate change. Since the price of goods and services that emit greenhouse<br />

gases during production does not reflect the economic damages associated<br />

with those gases, market forces result in a level of emissions that is too<br />

high from society’s perspective. Such a market failure can be addressed by<br />

policy. The most efficient policy would respond to this market failure by<br />

putting an economy-wide price on the right to emit greenhouse gases. In<br />

the absence of a uniform carbon price to regulate emissions, however, other<br />

climate policy mechanisms can improve social welfare by pricing emissions<br />

indirectly. For example, putting in place emission limits and incentivizing<br />

low-carbon alternatives can make carbon-intensive technology relatively<br />

more expensive, shifting demand toward less carbon-intensive products,<br />

and thus reducing emissions. Energy efficiency standards can reduce energy<br />

use, implicitly addressing the external costs of emissions and resulting overconsumption<br />

of energy. Gasoline or oil taxes help to directly address the<br />

external costs due to emissions from the combustion of oil.<br />

Correcting Other Market Failures<br />

Some policies to address the climate change externality have an additional<br />

economic benefit from addressing other market failures. For example,<br />

reducing carbon dioxide emissions through lower carbon electricity generation<br />

often also reduces the emissions of local and regional air pollutants that<br />

cause damage to human health, a second environmental externality.<br />

There are also innovation market failures where some of the returns<br />

from investment in innovation and new product development spill over<br />

to other firms from the firm engaged in innovation. For example, there is<br />

substantial evidence that the social returns from research and development<br />

Addressing Climate Change | 429

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!