29.12.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

2hzAyD3

2hzAyD3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Box 2-4: Optimal Weighting for Combining<br />

Measures of Economic Activity<br />

The U.S. economy is large, dynamic, and complex; measuring it in<br />

real time can be extremely difficult at best. Data on the strength of the<br />

economy depend on extensive surveys of households and businesses and<br />

administrative data that are necessarily imperfect and incomplete, and<br />

the Federal statistical agencies—the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA),<br />

the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), and the Census Bureau—frequently<br />

revise their estimates as newer and better underlying data become available.<br />

Given both the uncertainty inherent in any statistical measure and<br />

the standard practice of revising estimates, it is often better to look at<br />

multiple sources of data when assessing the state of the U.S. economy<br />

in real time. For example, as noted in Box 2-4 of the 2016 Economic<br />

Report of the President, growth in the average of estimates of real gross<br />

domestic product (GDP) and real gross domestic income (GDI)—which<br />

CEA refers to as real gross domestic output (GDO)—is a better predictor<br />

of one-quarter-ahead real GDP growth than are estimates of real GDP<br />

growth itself.<br />

However, policymakers must often make decisions in real time,<br />

and may not have the ability to wait for multiple rounds of revisions to<br />

assess current economic conditions. (See Box 1-1 for a specific example.)<br />

As such, they may need to rely on early (incomplete) economic data<br />

on employment and output. It is important to note, though, that not<br />

all measures contain the same amount of uncertainty: some firstreported<br />

estimates come from surveys with large sample sizes and tend<br />

to be revised less, while others contain a larger number of statistical<br />

assumptions and consequently may undergo more substantial revisions.<br />

Consequently, when attempting to understand the current position of<br />

the U.S. economy in real time, one should not necessarily weight all<br />

current measures equally.<br />

Each month, the BLS reports two estimates of over-the-month<br />

changes in employment. The first, known as the “household” estimate,<br />

is derived from the Current Population Survey, which samples approximately<br />

60,000 households each month and asks household members<br />

about their employment status in the previous month. The second,<br />

known as the “establishment” or “payroll” estimate, is derived from a<br />

survey of more than 400,000 worksites covering about a third of total<br />

nonfarm employment in the United States. Although the establishment<br />

survey has a much larger sample size, it suffers both from statistical noise<br />

and some systematic errors, especially in recording employment gains at<br />

new firms that come into existence and employment losses at old firms<br />

that have closed. Moreover, monthly jobs estimates are revised multiple<br />

88 | Chapter 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!