3. - Schlösser-Magazin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. Comparison 42 3. Justification for Inscription of Palace and Garden Properties The Palace and Park of Favorite Basic Facts Location: Germany, state of Baden- Württemberg, city of Rastatt Historical outline: From 1700 Margrave Ludwig Wilhelm of Baden-Baden commissioned the building of a residential palace in Rastatt, with a planned city to match, to replace a hunting lodge already under construction. 1698 laying out of a large game park; 1710-1725 construction of the summer palace and hunting lodge of “Favorite”, commissioned by the Margrave’s widow, Sibylla Augusta of Baden-Baden; next to the palace courtiers’ pavilions (1717), two orangeries (1717/25) and a hermitage in the “Fasanenwäldchen” or pheasant wood (1718) are built from plans by Ludwig Michael Rohrer; 1720-25 laying out of the Baroque garden with artistic input by the painter Franz Pfleger; 1771 after the death of Margrave August Georg the margravate falls to the house of Baden-Durlach; 1780 working orangeries discontinued; 1788-1805 Margrave Carl Friedrich of Baden-Durlach commissions the conversion of the park into a garden “in the English taste” by Johann Michael Schweyckert; in the 2nd half of the 19thcentury an arboretum-like plant collection is added; 1964-1982 the palace is thoroughly overhauled and restored; from the mid-1970s the garden is restored on the basis of a park management plan. Characteristics: The palace and garden of Favorite constitute an intimate, quite lovely estate furnished in a very personal style. The park is a classical landscape garden (without follies) retaining Baroque elements and also integrating more recent additions and exotic trees. Even today a visit conjures up the palace’s original purpose – to serve as a place of aristocratic entertainment, hunts and masquerades but also of quiet contemplation and the enjoyment of the arts. Topical Comparison Summer residence: central area with the palace surviving intact; major parts of the functional “fringe” (coach houses, stables, servants’ quarters, nesting houses in the pheasant run) are lost; no spatial connection with a town established; the topographic alignment towards the palace of Ettlingen and location on the axis between Rastatt (main residence) and Ebersteinburg still partially visible in the countryside. Synthesis of gardening styles: Landscape garden integrating elements of the Baroque layout; concepts and elements from a number of stylistic phases clearly visible, but rather than present a synthesis of two styles the garden integrates individual elements. Furnishing: Buildings (hermitage) survive; of the statuary, only the column of a fountain and the statues on the palace exterior remain; the park never contained any follies. Technical monuments: none. Authenticity: Favorite is the oldest surviving porcelain palace in Europe, and very expensively furnished. The garden has been carefully restored on the basis of research and conclusive findings, in the appearance passed down by history, with the landscape garden largely intact. Lost elements have not been reconstructed. Summary The character of Favorite is that of an intimate summer palace, furnished in an
uncommonly personal and individual taste (hermitage, porcelain collection) – an impression only reinforced by the fact that functional buildings and elements have disappeared. Its comparatively small size and massed furnishing are due to the status of a Margravate. The garden has been redesigned completely to become a landscape garden. Bibliography Rudolf Sillib: Schloß Favorite und die Eremitagen der Markgräfin Franziska Sibylla Augusta von Baden-Baden. Heidelberg 1914. Richard Melling: Der Schlosspark von Favorite und seine schönen Bäume. In: Badische Heimat, 30. Karlsruhe 1950. Dieter Hennebo, Alfred Hoffmann: Der architektonische Garten, Renaissance und Barock. Hamburg 1965. Walter Schwenecke: Parkpflegewerk für den Park des Schlosses Favorite bei Rastatt. Karlsruhe 1979. Hubert W. Wertz: Schlosspark Favorite bei Rastatt: In: Garten + Landschaft, 5/1988, p. 28-32. Ulrike Grimm, Wolfgang Wiese: Was bleibt. Markgrafenschätze aus vier Jahrhunderten für die badischen Schlösser bewahrt. Stuttgart 1996. Manuel Bechtold, Sandra Eberle, Ulrike Grimm, Sigrid Gensichen: Schloss Favorite Rastatt mit Garten und Eremitage. München 2007. Palace of Solitude 3. Justification for Inscription Basic Facts Location: Germany, state of Baden- Württemberg, city of Stuttgart Historical outline: Begun in 1763 under Duke Carl Eugen, developed into a grand pleasure palace by 1772; garden first laid out in Rococo style by Friedrich Christoph Hemmerling, from 1767 enlarged by Reinhard Ferdinand Heinrich Fischer and furnished with many buildings; from 1775 gradual descent into obscurity and deterioration due to the ascent of Hohenheim; translocation of several buildings (church, stables). Characteristics: According to Hennebo the palace is representative of the somewhat contradictory wishes for both a quiet place of refuge and an opportunity for courtly display. Notable for its time is the very modern interest in the cultivation of crop plants. Today the summer palace sits by itself, like a solitaire gemstone, in the surrounding countryside. Topical Comparison Summer residence: ”Cavalierbau“ (courtiers’ house) with chapel, ”Officenbau“ (officials’ house) with theatre, ”Hall of Laurels“ with Apollo temple, hedge theatre and stables all denote functions of a summer residence. Impressively linked (from 1764) to the main residence by way of a perfectly straight avenue; after a brief heyday the estate suffered a rapid decline in the chaotic wake of the Napoleonic wars. Synthesis of gardening styles: lavishly furnished Rococo garden on the brink of 3. 43
Page 1: Nomination for Inscription on the U
Page 5 and 6: Contents Nomination Form 1. Identif
Page 7 and 8: 1. Identification of the Property 1
Page 9 and 10: 1. Identification of the Property 1
Page 11 and 12: 2. Description 2.a) Description of
Page 13 and 14: Captions (italics denote a selectio
Page 15 and 16: of the eighteenth-centuries. Most o
Page 17 and 18: projecting galleries, and stalls ge
Page 19 and 20: pavilion of the southern arbour wal
Page 21 and 22: the other rooms in the bathhouse, w
Page 23 and 24: y wooden columns. The trellises, to
Page 25 and 26: Areas Bordering the Gardens, and Bu
Page 27 and 28: Palatina; 1773: publication of the
Page 29 and 30: function, was guaranteed by the con
Page 31 and 32: (Monuments in the Administrative Di
Page 33 and 34: 3. Justification for Inscription 3
Page 35 and 36: as it were, in the palace garden, t
Page 37 and 38: “Arboretum” is at the very begi
Page 39 and 40: However, archaeological activity wa
Page 41: 3.c) Comparative Analysis Introduct
Page 45 and 46: east of the palace; 1803/04 constru
Page 47 and 48: Authenticity: The palace was only s
Page 49 and 50: der Gärten Nymphenburg und Schwetz
Page 51 and 52: Court Garden of Ansbach Basic Facts
Page 53 and 54: Characteristics: Today the Bayreuth
Page 55 and 56: is in the merely rudimentary landsc
Page 57 and 58: has been lost. The original statue
Page 59 and 60: Summary Herrenhausen performed the
Page 61 and 62: Palace of Sanssouci Basic Facts Loc
Page 63 and 64: Garden Kingdom of Dessau-Wörlitz B
Page 65 and 66: under King Johann of Saxony (1801-1
Page 67 and 68: of palace chapel; 1715 death of Lou
Page 69 and 70: World Heritage site since 1996. Cha
Page 71 and 72: Technical monuments: The 1725 ”Wi
Page 73 and 74: Palace Garden of Palazzo Reale, Cas
Page 75 and 76: Characteristics: The estate incorpo
Page 77 and 78: Summary Even after the main residen
Page 79 and 80: Géza Galavics: Egy elfeledett ango
Page 81 and 82: Blenheim Castle und Park Basic Fact
Page 83 and 84: Topical Comparison Summer residence
Page 85 and 86: Philipp, enlarged from 1748 under E
Page 87 and 88: encroachment of the residential are
Page 89 and 90: Technical Monuments Technical monum
Page 91 and 92: Comparison of Outstanding Artistic
Page 93 and 94:
eference to Greek antiquity. 13 The
Page 95 and 96:
of the palace and as a star-shaped
Page 97 and 98:
laying out of such a collection as
Page 99 and 100:
gardens in 1804-1823. 45 Here Sckel
Page 101 and 102:
Bayreuth. A novel element is the sl
Page 103 and 104:
current appearance is shaped by num
Page 105 and 106:
early as 1753 the “Salle de Comé
Page 107 and 108:
Garden Mosques The mosque, built 17
Page 109 and 110:
in a garden plan of that year. 90 T
Page 111 and 112:
3.d) Integrity and/or Authenticity
Page 113 and 114:
Thus the numerous small 18th-centur
Page 115 and 116:
3. Justification for Inscription 3.
Page 117 and 118:
4. State of Conservation and Factor
Page 119 and 120:
4. State of Conservation and Factor
Page 121 and 122:
Planned Measures The Management Pla
Page 123 and 124:
necessary steps are taken to avoid
Page 125 and 126:
5. Protection and Management of the
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
environmental features worthy of pr
Page 133 and 134:
special conservation areas designat
Page 135 and 136:
• the palace gardens, combining B
Page 137 and 138:
5.c) Means of Implementing Protecti
Page 139 and 140:
5.e) Property Management Plan or Ot
Page 141 and 142:
5.g) Sources of Expertise and Train
Page 143 and 144:
Since 1991, guided tours of the pal
Page 145 and 146:
5.i) Policies and Programmes Relate
Page 147 and 148:
5.j) Staffing Levels (Professional,
Page 149 and 150:
6. Monitoring 6.a) Key Indicators f
Page 151 and 152:
Schwetzingen: A Prince Elector‘s
Page 153 and 154:
Date Title, author, source Content
Page 155 and 156:
6. Monitoring 6. 155
Page 157 and 158:
7. Documentation 7.a) Photographs,
Page 159 and 160:
7.d) Addresses where Inventory, Rec
Page 161 and 162:
8. Contact Information 8.a) Prepare
Page 163 and 164:
Badische Heimat, Bezirksgruppe Schw
Page 165 and 166:
9. Signatures on Behalf of the Stat
Page 167 and 168:
I. Report on the Architectural and
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
II. Report on the Garden Historical
Page 187 and 188:
uildings - that rarely corresponded
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
III. Report on the Excellence of Ga
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
By 1681, Liselotte‘s brother, Pri
Page 203 and 204:
IV. Report on the Historical Import
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
V. Report on the Music Historical I
Page 211 and 212:
list of musicians for the first tim
Page 213 and 214:
all occasions, must be the conseque
Page 215 and 216:
classical Viennese composers) the s
Page 217 and 218:
green vines, and mystifyingly bound
Page 219 and 220:
the German Southwest in the 18th-Ce
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
VI. Interpretation of the Palace Ga
Page 235 and 236:
the significance of Schwetzingen Ga
Page 237 and 238:
Pfalz-Zweibrücken, the Palatinate
Page 239 and 240:
On 29 August 1749, the Prince Elect
Page 241 and 242:
owners and designers of gardens to
Page 243 and 244:
conceptualisation underlying the ga
Page 245 and 246:
parterre, the “Schwetzingen compa
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
About the Experts Michael Hesse Pro
Page 267 and 268:
team at the Berlin-Brandenburg Acad
show all

3. - Schlösser-Magazin

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?