18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition, VEGFR inhibition (cediranib),<br />

or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition<br />

are either underway or in planning.<br />

In summary, the pivotal clinical trial performed by the<br />

EORTC and NCIC using radiation and temozolomide established<br />

the current standard <strong>of</strong> care for patients with newly<br />

diagnosed glioblastoma. Efforts to improve on these results<br />

with intensification <strong>of</strong> the chemotherapy were unsuccessful.<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> studies have been performed or are underway to<br />

determine whether there are synergistic therapies that can<br />

further enhance outcomes for this patient population and<br />

thereby establish a new standard <strong>of</strong> care.<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> Recurrent Glioblastoma<br />

The treatment <strong>of</strong> recurrent glioblastoma remains unsatisfactory.<br />

Tumor resection for recurrent disease does not<br />

appear to substantially affect either the 6-month progressionfree<br />

survival rate nor overall survival from the time <strong>of</strong><br />

progression. 18 However, relief <strong>of</strong> tumor-induced mass effect<br />

may be clinically beneficial and the confirmation <strong>of</strong> true<br />

recurrence (rather than treatment-related necrosis or pseudoprogression)<br />

may be extremely helpful in treatment decisions.<br />

A wide variety <strong>of</strong> approaches have been studied for recurrent<br />

glioblastoma. These include local strategies <strong>of</strong>ten requiring<br />

a surgical procedure and systemic chemotherapy<br />

treatments either as single agent or in combination.<br />

Locoregional Treatment Strategies<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> treatment approaches have been tested targeting<br />

the tumor directly, recognizing that spread <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> the nervous system is rare. Use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

carmustine-impregnated bioerodable polymer was tested for<br />

recurrent disease and in a placebo-controlled randomized<br />

trial showed a modest, but statistically significant improvement<br />

in the 6-month survival rate. 19 These findings led to<br />

FDA approval, but this treatment approach is not used<br />

widely today.<br />

Attempts to improve delivery <strong>of</strong> agents directly to tumor<br />

led to the institution <strong>of</strong> convectional enhanced delivery.<br />

Intratumoral catheters delivering small volumes <strong>of</strong> fluid<br />

under pressure have been shown to spread widely from the<br />

point <strong>of</strong> infusion. This method was used to deliver cintredekin<br />

besudotox (interleukin [IL]-13-PE38QQR, IL-13<br />

pseudomona extoxin) in a series <strong>of</strong> clinical trials. Despite<br />

strong preclinical data, there was no improvement in outcome<br />

compared with the carmustine wafer in a phase III<br />

clinical trial. 20 Alternative strategies are looking at using<br />

convection-enhanced delivery for chemotherapies, particularly<br />

those like topotecan that do not cross the blood-brain<br />

barrier with systemic delivery. 21<br />

Direct injection <strong>of</strong> vectors containing gene therapies has<br />

also been evaluated. Preclinical studies using transfection <strong>of</strong><br />

the herpes thymidine kinase gene into tumor cells by using<br />

a retroviral vector demonstrated high efficacy after administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> acyclovir or ganciclovir. However, clinical trials<br />

in both recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma failed<br />

to demonstrate efficacy, potentially the consequence <strong>of</strong><br />

poor vector delivery by using direct injection into the walls<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tumor cavity. 22 More recently, replication-competent<br />

viruses are being evaluated in clinical trials, potentially<br />

reducing the problem <strong>of</strong> delivery with continued local pro-<br />

114<br />

MARK R. GILBERT<br />

duction and spread <strong>of</strong> the virus. For example, the delta-24<br />

virus, a replication-competent adenovirus that requires amplification<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Rb pathway to replicate, is currently being<br />

studied in a clinical trial. 23<br />

Systemic Chemotherapy<br />

Metronomic and dose-dense temozolomide. Dose-dense temozolomide<br />

has also been investigated in patients with<br />

recurrent glioblastoma. 24 Two alternative dosing schedules,<br />

alternating weekly schedule or 21 consecutive days <strong>of</strong> a<br />

28-day cycle, have been used most commonly. Several phase<br />

II trials have evaluated the “21 <strong>of</strong> 28-day” regimen with<br />

6-month progression-free survival rates ranging from 18% to<br />

30% even in patients with prior temozolomide exposure.<br />

Similarly, retrospective analyses <strong>of</strong> patients treated with<br />

the “week on, week <strong>of</strong>f ” dose-dense schedule with temozolomide<br />

report a 6-month progression-free survival rate as high<br />

as 36%. Both schedules are associated with a high rate <strong>of</strong><br />

lymphopenia, although this toxicity may be more pronounced<br />

with the 21 <strong>of</strong> 28-day schedule.<br />

Metronomic schedules <strong>of</strong> temozolomide have been evaluated<br />

in a prospective clinical trial. 25 Temozolomide was<br />

administered at low dose (50 mg/m 2 /day) continuously to<br />

patients who had previously been treated with standard<br />

dosing <strong>of</strong> temozolomide as a component <strong>of</strong> first-line treatment<br />

(as described previously herein for newly diagnosed<br />

glioblastoma). Interestingly, patients rechallenged after<br />

early failure (� 6 months <strong>of</strong> adjuvant temozolomide) or after<br />

a treatment-free interval experienced 6-month progressionfree<br />

survival rates <strong>of</strong> 27% and 36%, respectively. Patients<br />

with treatment failure during adjuvant treatment but more<br />

than six cycles fared poorly. These results suggest that in<br />

select subpopulations, re-treatment with temozolomide may<br />

be effective.<br />

Resistance modulation with PARP inhibitors. There is<br />

increasing interest in exploring inhibitors <strong>of</strong> PARP as a<br />

novel strategy to enhance the efficacy <strong>of</strong> temozolomide and<br />

address the recent finding that recurrent glioblastomas<br />

acquire either MSH6 mismatch gene–inactivating mutations<br />

or hypermethylation <strong>of</strong> the promoter region leading to<br />

reduced expression. 26 Several PARP inhibitors are in early<br />

clinical trials, typically in combination with a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

temozolomide dosing schedules. The dose-limiting toxicity<br />

is likely to be myelosuppression, supporting the need for<br />

pharmcodynamic studies confirming maximal synergy <strong>of</strong><br />

PARP inhibition with temozolomide-induced tumor DNA<br />

damage.<br />

Nitrosoureas and other chemotherapy agents. Nitrosoureas<br />

such as carmustine and lomustine were the standard<br />

treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas but their<br />

use steadily declined with the introduction <strong>of</strong> temozolomide,<br />

which is better tolerated and rarely causes cumulative<br />

myelotoxicity. There has been a recent resurgence <strong>of</strong> nitrosourea<br />

use after the report <strong>of</strong> a 6-month progression-free<br />

survival rate <strong>of</strong> 19% in patients with prior temozolomide<br />

exposure. 27 Other chemotherapy agents such as irinotecan,<br />

carboplatin, cisplatin and procarbazine are used but the<br />

response rates in recurrent disease have been modest.<br />

Targeted agents. As discussed previously, glioblastoma<br />

has been classified into two types primarily on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

genetic features. Although there is some similarity in genetic<br />

alterations, such as loss <strong>of</strong> phosphotase and tensin<br />

homolog on chromosome 10 (PTEN), loss <strong>of</strong> cyclin-dependent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!