18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

histologic section–based molecular tests (e.g., FISH and<br />

IHC).<br />

On the other hand, our growing understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cancer biology <strong>of</strong> NSCLC, particularly the molecular evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> tumors during local progression and metastasis and<br />

the identification <strong>of</strong> molecular abnormalities contributing to<br />

resistance to TK inhibitor therapies, emphasizes the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> characterizing the molecular abnormalities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disease at every stage <strong>of</strong> its evolution. For molecular testing<br />

<strong>of</strong> advanced metastatic NSCLC, it is important to sample<br />

and analyze the tumors’ sample at each time point <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

decision making.<br />

Relevant Molecular Pathologic Analysis Methods<br />

Currently, most <strong>of</strong> the predictive molecular markers available<br />

for therapy selection in NSCLC are oncogene mutations<br />

and amplifications. However, other molecular and genetic<br />

changes modulate the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> tumor to targeted therapies,<br />

including protein overexpression, gene methylation,<br />

and gene expression abnormalities. The need for analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

multiple molecular and genetic changes in small, clinically<br />

relevant biopsy and cytology specimens has driven the<br />

scientific community and the molecular pathology laboratories<br />

to develop multiplex approaches for molecular testing<br />

<strong>of</strong> small tumors samples, particularly for gene mutation<br />

analysis.<br />

Mutation Analysis<br />

Currently, direct nucleic acid sequencing with previous<br />

polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification <strong>of</strong> extracted<br />

DNA is the most commonly used technique for gene mutation<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> tumor biopsy and cytology samples to detect<br />

mutations <strong>of</strong> clinically relevant genes. Several sequencing<br />

methods are available for mutation analysis <strong>of</strong> DNA extracted<br />

from tumor tissue and cell specimens, especially<br />

for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. The<br />

current PCR-based sequencing mutation analysis methods<br />

can be divided into uniplex (e.g., Sanger sequencing and<br />

pyrosequencing) and multiplex (e.g., matrix-assisted laser<br />

desorption ionization time-<strong>of</strong>-light mass spectrometry and<br />

primer extension assay) methods. In the uniplex method,<br />

one hotspot sequence is examined at a time, while the<br />

multiplex technique multiple hotspot mutations are examined<br />

simultaneously. The multiplex approaches are clearly<br />

the preferred methods since they allow more efficient mutation<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> small amounts <strong>of</strong> DNA for multiple hotspots<br />

(approximately 100 to 200) from a panel <strong>of</strong> genes (approximately<br />

10 to 30).<br />

Sanger Sequencing<br />

In solid tumors, including lung, Sanger sequencing is the<br />

most commonly used sequencing method to detect hotspot<br />

mutations <strong>of</strong> oncogenes (e.g., EGFR, KRAS, BRAF). This<br />

type <strong>of</strong> sequencing can detect essentially all base substitutions,<br />

small insertions, and deletions. Its main disadvantage<br />

is the relatively low sensitivity (approximately 20%) for the<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> mutant alleles in the DNA sample extracted<br />

from tumor specimens. These DNA samples are usually a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> mutant and wild-type alleles as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> malignant and nonmalignant (from adjacent<br />

normal or tumor stroma) cells in the tumor tissue specimens.<br />

25<br />

462<br />

Pyrosequencing<br />

Pyrosequencing uses sequencing by a synthesis method<br />

to sequence nucleic acids and relies on the detection <strong>of</strong><br />

pyrophosphate release on nucleotide incorporation. Pyrosequencing<br />

is considered to be more sensitive than Sanger<br />

sequencing and detects approximately 5% <strong>of</strong> mutant compared<br />

with wild-type alleles. 26<br />

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-<strong>of</strong>-Light<br />

Mass Spectrometry<br />

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-<strong>of</strong>-light<br />

mass spectrometry (Sequenom) utilizes a high-throughput<br />

PCR-based sequencing assay to detect multiple hotspot<br />

mutations simultaneously using small amounts <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />

obtained from biopsy and cytology specimens. 27 It has a high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> sensitivity (approximately 5% <strong>of</strong> the mutant alleles)<br />

and allows quantification <strong>of</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> mutant<br />

DNA. 27 The Sequenom method is also useful to assess gene<br />

amplification.<br />

Primer Extension Assay<br />

Primer extension assay is a primer extension–based<br />

method that allows simultaneous analysis <strong>of</strong> up to 10 different<br />

mutations. 28 It is a sensitive, low-cost, and rapid method<br />

to screen for mutations and to analyze methylation. This<br />

assay uses the SNaPshot Multiplex Kit (Applied Biosystems<br />

Inc), which contains a reaction mix <strong>of</strong> four differentially<br />

fluorescently labeled ddNTPs, allowing the interrogation <strong>of</strong><br />

each base at a mutation site. 28<br />

Translocation and Gene Copy Number Analyses<br />

FISH is a cytogenetic technique that uses fluorescentlabeled<br />

probes to hybridize specific sequences <strong>of</strong> DNA on<br />

chromosomes. 29 It is applied to visualize chromosome deletions,<br />

amplification, and structural rearrangements. The<br />

main advantage <strong>of</strong> this technique is that it allows in situ localization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the specific sequences and the simultaneous<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> multiple sites by using hybridization probes<br />

labeled with different fluorophores. The main disadvantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> FISH is the need <strong>of</strong> additional equipment for analysis,<br />

such as dark-field microscopy and multiband fluorescent<br />

filters. Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a variant <strong>of</strong> the<br />

in situ hybridization technique that visualizes the specific<br />

DNA sequence by a peroxidase reaction and allows the<br />

visualization in a light microscope. The main disadvantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> this method is that it limits the use <strong>of</strong> different label<br />

probes to target multiple sites; however, recent advances in<br />

methodologies permit the use <strong>of</strong> dual colors to target two<br />

sequencing sites and enable the visualization <strong>of</strong> tissue<br />

architecture and cytomorphologic analysis. Although there<br />

are other methods available for gene copy number and<br />

fusion genes analyses, such as DNA quantitative PCR assay<br />

for copy number assessment and messenger RNA quantitative<br />

PCR assay for gene fusion analysis, FISH continues to<br />

be the preferred method for gene copy number (e.g., MET,<br />

FGFR1) and gene fusion (e.g., EML4-ALK) in lung cancer.<br />

Protein Expression Analysis<br />

IGNACIO I. WISTUBA<br />

IHC is a widely used technique in pathology laboratories<br />

to detect the presence and levels <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> a specific<br />

protein in FFPE tumor cytology and cytology specimens. In<br />

lung cancer, the use <strong>of</strong> IHC is currently used for histopatho-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!