18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMBINATIONS FOR MELANOMA<br />

agents that, when combined, have increased antitumor<br />

activity with decreased toxicities.<br />

Despite the wealth <strong>of</strong> supportive preliminary evidence,<br />

14,16-18 studies combining a BRAF inhibitor with a<br />

PI3K or AKT inhibitor to treat or prevent MAPKindependent<br />

resistance are not in the clinic. However, there<br />

are several experiences combining MEK inhibitors with<br />

PI3K inhibitors that may provide the benefit <strong>of</strong> blocking<br />

both pathways. But this potential benefit has to be weighed<br />

against the expected increase in toxicities because neither<br />

agent would be directly blocking a mutated oncogene in this<br />

setting.<br />

Combination <strong>of</strong> Immunotherapies and<br />

Targeted Therapies<br />

Combinations <strong>of</strong> immunotherapy agents and oncogene<br />

driver inhibitors have the potential to merge the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

both types <strong>of</strong> agents for patients with advanced melanoma.<br />

Targeted oncogene pathway inhibitors induce high rates <strong>of</strong><br />

tumor responses that tend to last months, whereas immunemodulating<br />

agents tend to have infrequent but highly durable<br />

tumor responses. The promise <strong>of</strong> combining them is to<br />

maintain the high rate <strong>of</strong> targeted therapy responses and<br />

make them more frequently durable with immunotherapies.<br />

23,24<br />

Key to the development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> combination is<br />

demonstrating that both approaches are not negatively<br />

interacting, although they can have synergistic effects by<br />

potentiating each other. In vitro studies have shown that<br />

Author’s Disclosures <strong>of</strong> Potential Conflicts <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

Author<br />

Employment or<br />

Leadership<br />

Positions<br />

Consultant or<br />

Advisory Role<br />

Antoni Ribas Amgen; Bristol-<br />

Myers Squibb;<br />

Celgene;<br />

Genentech;<br />

Merck;<br />

Millennium;<br />

Roche<br />

1. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with<br />

ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. New Engl J Med. 2010;<br />

363:711-723.<br />

2. Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine<br />

for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. New Engl J Med. 2011;364:<br />

2517-2526.<br />

3. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with<br />

vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med.<br />

2011;364:2507-2716.<br />

4. Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM. Tremelimumab and interferon combination<br />

in melanoma. Semin Oncol. In press.<br />

5. Maker AV, Phan GQ, Attia P, et al. Tumor regression and autoimmunity<br />

in patients treated with cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen<br />

4 blockade and interleukin 2: a phase I/II study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:<br />

1005-1016.<br />

6. Ribas A, Comin-Anduix B, Chmielowski B, et al. Dendritic cell vaccination<br />

combined with CTLA4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma.<br />

Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6267-6276.<br />

7. Uno T, Takeda K, Kojima Y, et al. Eradication <strong>of</strong> established tumors in<br />

mice by a combination antibody-based therapy. Nat Med. 2006;12:693-698.<br />

8. Takeda K, Kojima Y, Uno T, et al. Combination therapy <strong>of</strong> established<br />

tumors by antibodies targeting immune activating and suppressing molecules.<br />

J Immunol. 2010;184:5493-5501.<br />

BRAF inhibitors are not detrimental to human or murine<br />

lymphocyte function. 25,26 Furthermore, given the evidence<br />

that BRAF inhibitors can induce a paradoxical activation <strong>of</strong><br />

the MAPK pathway in cells that have strong RAS/GTP<br />

activity, 27-29 which would be expected to also occur in<br />

activated lymphocytes, it is certainly possible that at certain<br />

doses and concentrations BRAF inhibitors may actually<br />

potentiate the function <strong>of</strong> lymphocytes. Besides this potential<br />

beneficial effect <strong>of</strong> BRAF inhibitors directly in immune<br />

cells, these agents may benefit in combination by increasing<br />

expression or cross-presentation <strong>of</strong> tumor antigens to the<br />

immune system, or by releasing signals that lead to an<br />

adverse tumor environment limiting immune cell function.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Advances in the treatment <strong>of</strong> metastatic melanoma are<br />

based on an improved understanding <strong>of</strong> the immunobiology<br />

and oncogenic signaling in this disease. Single-agent therapies<br />

with ipilimumab and vemurafenib have demonstrated<br />

improvement in patient survival in randomized clinical<br />

trials. 1-3 However, the majority <strong>of</strong> patients still require<br />

additional treatment options. Understanding the mechanisms<br />

<strong>of</strong> action and resistance to the new single-agent<br />

therapies allows an opportunity to rationally design combination<br />

therapies that may provide additional benefits to<br />

patients. Such combinations are being developed preclinically<br />

and in the clinic, and are poised to change the current<br />

treatment approaches for patients with metastatic melanoma.<br />

Stock<br />

Ownership Honoraria<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Research<br />

Funding<br />

Expert<br />

Testimony<br />

Other<br />

Remuneration<br />

9. Poulikakos PI, Persaud Y, Janakiraman M, et al. RAF inhibitor resistance<br />

is mediated by dimerization <strong>of</strong> aberrantly spliced BRAF(V600E).<br />

Nature. 2011;480:387-390.<br />

10. Shi H, Moriceau G, Kong X, et al. Melanoma V600E BRAF amplification<br />

drives acquired resistance to vemurafenib. Nat Commun. In press.<br />

11. Nazarian R, Shi H, Wang Q, et al. Melanomas acquire resistance to<br />

B-RAF(V600E) inhibition by RTK or N-RAS upregulation. Nature. 2010;468:<br />

973-977.<br />

12. Wagle N, Emery C, Berger MF, et al. Dissecting therapeutic resistance<br />

to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iling. J Clin Oncol.<br />

2011;29:3085-3096.<br />

13. Johannessen CM, Boehm JS, Kim SY, et al. COT drives resistance to<br />

RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation. Nature. 2010;468:<br />

968-672.<br />

14. Shi H, Kong X, Ribas A, et al. Combinatorial treatments that overcome<br />

PDGFR{beta}-driven resistance <strong>of</strong> melanoma cells to V600EB-RAF inhibition.<br />

Cancer Res. 2011;71:5067-5074.<br />

15. Villanueva J, Vultur A, Lee JT, et al. Acquired resistance to BRAF<br />

inhibitors mediated by a RAF kinase switch in melanoma can be overcome by<br />

cotargeting MEK and IGF-1R/PI3K. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:683-695.<br />

16. Jiang CC, Lai F, Thorne RF, et al. MEK-independent survival <strong>of</strong><br />

B-RAFV600E melanoma cells selected for resistance to apoptosis induced by<br />

the RAF inhibitor PLX4720. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:721-730.<br />

677

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!