18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1. Surgical Management and Outcomes in Elderly<br />

Patients with Early Stage NSCLC<br />

More recent studies provide a current idea <strong>of</strong> the risks and<br />

outcomes for older patients with early stage NSCLC. A<br />

nested case-control study in France between January 2004<br />

and December 2008 matched nearly 2,000 patients age 70 or<br />

older with stage I/II NSCLC with matched controls younger<br />

than age 70 in order to compare surgical treatment and<br />

postoperative outcomes. 9 These results are outlined in Table<br />

1. Although the frequency <strong>of</strong> radical lymph-node dissection<br />

was more common in the younger patient, there was otherwise<br />

no significant difference in the type <strong>of</strong> resection between<br />

younger and older patients. The frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

lobectomy was 77% in the younger patient and 79% in the<br />

older patients, with pneumonectomy in 11% <strong>of</strong> the younger<br />

patients and 8% in the older patients. Sublobar resections<br />

occurred in only 7% <strong>of</strong> the patients younger than age 70 and<br />

6% over the age <strong>of</strong> 70. Postoperative mortality was higher in<br />

the older patient with a 30-day mortality <strong>of</strong> 3.6% compared<br />

with 2.2% in the younger patients (p � 0.01). For the older<br />

population, perhaps an even more important endpoint is the<br />

90-day mortality. This endpoint was 4.7% in those patients<br />

older than age 70 compared with 2.5% in the population<br />

younger than age 70 (p � 0.0002). This result in particular<br />

shows the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> this population after thoracic<br />

surgery. However, the relatively low mortality in this age<br />

group across a wide number <strong>of</strong> institutions in France reassures<br />

us that patients appropriately selected for surgery can<br />

have similar outcomes.<br />

Improved outcomes with higher surgery rates for older<br />

patients with early-stage NSCLC have been recently reported<br />

from a national cohort study <strong>of</strong> over 17,000 Medicare<br />

KEY POINTS<br />

� age 70 � age 70<br />

n � 1,969 n � 1,969<br />

Lobectomy 77% 79% NS<br />

Pneumonectomy 11% 8% NS<br />

30 d mortality 2.2% 3.6% p � 0.01<br />

90 d mortality 2.5% 4.7% p � 0.0002<br />

● The majority <strong>of</strong> lung cancer occurs in the older<br />

population.<br />

● Advances in staging, surgery, and perioperative management<br />

have increased the number <strong>of</strong> older patients<br />

who are candidates for surgical resection for earlystage<br />

lung cancer.<br />

● Although the elderly population is clinically underrepresented<br />

in clinical trials, the data suggest that<br />

older, fit patients may have similar benefit with<br />

adjuvant chemotherapy than younger patients with<br />

a modest increase in toxicities.<br />

● Observational databases suggest that these benefits<br />

extend to the patients outside <strong>of</strong> clinical trials. In the<br />

United States, carboplatin is commonly substituted<br />

for cisplatin in the older patient population and<br />

benefits may be comparable within the limits <strong>of</strong> this<br />

data.<br />

316<br />

patients with stage I or II NSCLC, identified through the<br />

SEER database between 2001 and 2005. 10 In this study,<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> high and low rates <strong>of</strong> curative surgery for earlystage<br />

lung cancer were compared in an attempt to determine<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> surgery in older and sicker patients. In<br />

the low surgery areas, less than 63% <strong>of</strong> patients underwent<br />

surgery compared with greater than 79% in high surgery<br />

areas. Those high surgery areas also operated on more<br />

patients with advanced age and patients with chronic obstructive<br />

pulmonary disease. Despite this, the overall 1-year<br />

mortality was 18% in the high surgery area compared with<br />

22.8% in the low surgery area (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.89;<br />

95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–0.93). In addition, the<br />

1-year lung cancer specific mortality was lower in the high<br />

surgery area at 12% compared with 16.9% for the low<br />

surgery area (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.82–0.91). The training<br />

effect and expertise <strong>of</strong> the areas with higher rates <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />

was associated with older and sicker patients undergoing<br />

resection with improved survival. This speaks strongly to<br />

the need for identifying broader expertise and centers <strong>of</strong><br />

excellence for surgical intervention in older patients, both in<br />

the academic and community settings.<br />

Adjuvant Chemotherapy <strong>Clinical</strong> Trials<br />

JEFFREY CRAWFORD<br />

The 5-year survival rate for surgical resection alone in<br />

NSCLC is approximately 55% to 65% for patients with stage<br />

I disease, 40% to 55% for patients with stage II, and 20% to<br />

25% for stage III. Based on the Mountain staging system,<br />

which has served as the basis for the majority <strong>of</strong> adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy trial results currently available, 11 the Lung<br />

Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation (LACE) pooled analysis has<br />

reported survival improvement following surgical resection<br />

with the use <strong>of</strong> adjuvant chemotherapy between 4% and<br />

15%. 12 Among these trials, JBR.10 was a study conducted by<br />

the National Cancer Institute <strong>of</strong> Canada, comparing cisplatin<br />

and vinorelbine with observation. A subset analysis has<br />

been reported for the patients older than age 65 in this<br />

trial. 13 Three hundred twenty-seven patients age 65 or<br />

younger were compared to 155 patients older than age 65.<br />

The baseline demographics were similar for the two groups,<br />

with the exception <strong>of</strong> histology with 58% <strong>of</strong> younger patients<br />

having adenocarcinoma compared with 43% <strong>of</strong> the older<br />

patients. Squamous cell cancer was seen in 32% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

younger patients and 49% <strong>of</strong> the older patients (p � 0.001).<br />

Performance status 0 was also more frequent in the younger<br />

population—53% compared with 41% (p � 0.01). Chemotherapy<br />

significantly prolonged overall survival in the older<br />

population with a hazard ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.61 (95% CI, 0.38–0.98).<br />

This benefit was quite similar to the effect seen for the<br />

overall study population. Differences were seen in the mean<br />

dose intensity <strong>of</strong> vinorelbine and cisplatin, with the elderly<br />

patients receiving fewer doses <strong>of</strong> both agents. Fewer elderly<br />

patients completed treatment and more patients refused<br />

treatment. There were no significant differences in toxicities,<br />

hospitalizations, or treatment-related deaths by age<br />

group. There was a higher mortality rate from nonmalignant<br />

causes in the older population—21.1% compared with<br />

11.9% in the younger population, although this did not reach<br />

statistical significance. The authors concluded that, despite<br />

the fact that the older population received less chemotherapy<br />

overall, the improvement in survival <strong>of</strong> adjuvant vinorelbine<br />

and cisplatin was comparable to the result seen in<br />

the younger population and also had acceptable toxicity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!