18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ESTABLISHING TREATMENTS FOR GLIOBLASTOMA<br />

Table 1. Single-Agent Targeted Therapies for Recurrent Glioblastoma<br />

Agent Study Year Target<br />

kinase inhibitor p16 INK4A and amplification <strong>of</strong> CDK 4,<br />

primary glioblastoma typically has higher incidence <strong>of</strong> epidermal<br />

growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification with<br />

inactivation <strong>of</strong> PTEN and p16 tumor suppression genes. In<br />

contrast, secondary glioblastoma multiforme is characterized<br />

by mutation <strong>of</strong> TP53 gene and more recently, almost<br />

exclusively demonstrate mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase<br />

(IDH) 1 and 2 genes.<br />

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its receptor EGFR,<br />

platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) A and B and their<br />

receptors PDGFR � and �, VEGF and its receptor (VEGFR),<br />

insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and IGF receptor (IGFR),<br />

transforming growth factor (TGF)-�, fibroblast growth factor<br />

(FGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are thought to<br />

be critical to the pathogenesis and survival <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma.<br />

Activation <strong>of</strong> these tyrosine kinase receptors triggers three<br />

major downstream pathways: mitogen-activated protein<br />

kinase (MAPK); phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt; and<br />

phospholipase C� (PLC�) and protein kinase C (PKC). These<br />

signaling pathways regulate cell proliferation and differentiation<br />

and prevent apoptosis, and are therefore logical<br />

targets <strong>of</strong> treatment for glioblastoma.<br />

Unfortunately, despite these molecular findings in a high<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma, as indicated in Table 1, studies<br />

with single-agent signal transduction modulators demonstrated<br />

only modest results at best. In particular, even in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> amplification or mutation <strong>of</strong> EGFR, treatment<br />

with a potent EGFR inhibitor such as erlotinib did not result<br />

in a high response rate. Subsequent analyses suggested that<br />

response to erlotinib occurred only when the downstream<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the pathway was not already constitutively<br />

activated as indicated by the presence <strong>of</strong> a functional PTEN<br />

gene regulating Akt. 28 These results underscore the complex<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> signal transduction modulation strategies with<br />

pathway overlap and downstream effectors. Attempts and<br />

combination regimens <strong>of</strong> signal transduction modulators has<br />

been complicated by overlapping toxicities.<br />

Antiangiogenic agents. One <strong>of</strong> the hallmarks <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma<br />

is prominent angiogenesis, making this component <strong>of</strong><br />

tumor biology a logical target. The newly formed blood<br />

vessels are <strong>of</strong>ten poorly developed, with incomplete tight<br />

junction between endothelial cells and tortuous paths with<br />

blind loops. These features lead to peritumoral edema and<br />

account for much <strong>of</strong> the imaging enhancement by leakage <strong>of</strong><br />

systemic administration <strong>of</strong> contrast material before either<br />

computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. A<br />

Trial<br />

Phase<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Patients<br />

6-Month<br />

Progression-Free<br />

Survival (%)<br />

Erlotinib van den Bent29 2009 EGFR II 110 11<br />

Gefitinib Rich30 2004 EGFR II 53 13; 14<br />

Imatinib Raymond31 2008 C-ABL, C-KIT, PDGFR II 51 16<br />

Pazopanib Iwamoto32 2010 VEGFR, PDGFR II 35 3<br />

Vorinostat Galanis33 2009 HDAC II 66 15<br />

Tipifarnib Cloughesy34 2006 Farnesyltransferase II 67 12<br />

Galanis<br />

Temsirolimus<br />

35 2005 II 65 8<br />

Chang36 2005 mTOR 41 3<br />

Wick<br />

Enzastaurin<br />

27 2010 III 174 11<br />

Kreisl37 2010 PKC I/II 72 7<br />

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; C-ABL, a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase; C-KIT, a cell surface protein that binds stem cell factor;<br />

C-MET, met proto-oncogene; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; HDAC, histone deacetylase; mTOR,<br />

mammalian target <strong>of</strong> rapamycin; PKC, protein kinase C.<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> antiangiogenic agents have been tested, as outlined<br />

in Table 2.<br />

Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, works<br />

by sequestering the circulating ligand VEGF-A, resulting in<br />

angiogenesis inhibition. Several phase II studies have been<br />

performed in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Most<br />

studies demonstrate a response rate ranging from 25% to<br />

40% and a 6-month progression-free survival in the same<br />

range. Importantly, nearly all patients receiving bevacizumab<br />

are able to either reduce or stop corticosteroid use.<br />

These findings, most notably in a multicenter randomized<br />

noncomparative phase II trial, led to the accelerated approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.<br />

39<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> other antiangiogenic agents have been evaluated<br />

including aflibercept (VEGF-Trap), a decoy VEGFR<br />

fused to the Fc portion <strong>of</strong> an immunoglobulin molecule.<br />

However, results <strong>of</strong> a phase II trial in recurrent glioblastoma<br />

revealed only modest activity. Cediranib is a small-molecule<br />

tyrosine kinase inhibitor <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong> VEGFR that<br />

showed early efficacy, but a subsequent phase III trial with<br />

lomustine failed to demonstrate added benefit from the<br />

cediranib. Carbozantinib (XL184), a small-molecule agent<br />

that targets both VEGFR and c-Met also showed efficacy in<br />

early studies, but systemic toxicities <strong>of</strong>ten precluded extended<br />

use. Cilengitide is a novel antiangiogenic agent that<br />

targets the � v� 3 integrin that is required for endothelial cell<br />

migration for neovascularization. There may be additional<br />

tumor signal pathway effects that further enhance efficacy.<br />

Single-agent activity has been modest, but as described<br />

herein, synergistic efficacy with chemoradiation is being<br />

tested in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.<br />

Table 2. Antiangiogenic Therapies Investigated for<br />

Recurrent Glioblastoma<br />

Agent Study Year Target<br />

Trial<br />

Phase<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

Patients<br />

6-Month<br />

Progression-Free<br />

Survival (%)<br />

Cediranib Batchelor 38 2010 pan-VEGFR II 31 26<br />

Bevacizumab Friedman 39 2009 VEGF-A II 85 36<br />

Cilengitide Reardon 40 2008 � v� 3 integrin 81 15<br />

Gilbert 41 2011 � v� 5 integrin II 26 12<br />

XL-184 Wen 42 2010 VEGFR, C-MET II 124 21<br />

Abbreviations: VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; C-MET,<br />

met proto-oncogene; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGF, vascular<br />

endothelial growth factor.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!