18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for autologous SCT over conventional therapy. 19 Survival<br />

was significantly longer for patients who had undergone<br />

autologous SCT compared with patients conventionally<br />

treated.<br />

Results have now been reported for three phase III randomized<br />

trials examining the role <strong>of</strong> autologous transplant<br />

in CLL. 20-22 The European Intergroup Study randomly<br />

selected 223 patients, 83% after first-line therapy and 17%<br />

after second-line therapy. Only 59% <strong>of</strong> patients were in CR.<br />

Patients were randomly selected to receive autologous SCT<br />

(112 patients) and observation (111 patients). Autologous<br />

SCT significantly improved EFS from 24.4 months in the<br />

observation group to 51.2 months in the patients receiving<br />

autologous SCT, but there was no difference in OS at 5<br />

years. 20 In a second study, 241 patients received three<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine,<br />

and prednisone/prednisolone (mini-CHOP), and then<br />

three courses <strong>of</strong> fludarabine. Patients in CR were then<br />

randomly selected to receive autologous SCT or observation,<br />

whereas patients not in CR were randomly selected to<br />

receive salvage therapy followed by either autologous SCT<br />

or three courses <strong>of</strong> fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC).<br />

The patients achieving CR were also included for analysis in<br />

the European Intergroup Study. Autologous SCT improved<br />

EFS in patients achieving CR to initial therapy, but no<br />

differences were observed among patients who required<br />

salvage therapy. No difference in OS was found in either<br />

group. 21 The GOELAMS LLC 98 trial compared six monthly<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride,<br />

vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) followed by six CHOP<br />

courses every 3 months in responding patients with highdose<br />

therapy with autologous SCT used as consolidation in<br />

responding patients after three CHOP courses. A total <strong>of</strong> 86<br />

patients were enrolled, with 43 patients evaluable after<br />

autologous SCT. On an intent-to-treat basis and with a<br />

median follow-up time <strong>of</strong> 77.1 months, median PFS was 22<br />

months after conventional therapy and 53 months after<br />

autologous SCT (p � 0.0001). There was no difference in OS<br />

between the two arms. 25 Concerns regarding this trial<br />

include the relatively small number <strong>of</strong> patients enrolled; the<br />

trial had to be closed early because <strong>of</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong> emerging<br />

better induction therapies, leading to a low statistical power.<br />

The results obtained from these randomized studies all<br />

demonstrate that patients with chemotherapy-sensitive disease<br />

had prolongation in EFS but not OS. The question<br />

KEY POINTS<br />

● Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not<br />

curative for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and<br />

should be performed only in the setting <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

trials.<br />

● Myeloablative allogeneic SCT is applicable only to a<br />

small population and is associated with unacceptably<br />

high treatment-related morbidity and mortality.<br />

● Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic SCT is potentially<br />

curative but complicated by chronic GVHD.<br />

● Identifying patients with CLL who should receive<br />

transplantation and when in their clinical course this<br />

should occur remains a major challenge.<br />

400<br />

Study<br />

Table 1. Outcome after FCR or ASCT<br />

Number <strong>of</strong><br />

Patients<br />

remains if these patients would have had similar results if<br />

they had been <strong>of</strong>fered the type <strong>of</strong> chemoimmunotherapy that<br />

is the standard <strong>of</strong> care today. Whereas great caution must be<br />

taken comparing the outcome <strong>of</strong> separate studies, the outcomes<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> EFS and OS might be similar for patients<br />

treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab<br />

(FCR) and those receiving autologous SCT (Table 1). This<br />

does not address whether improved outcome would be seen<br />

with autologous SCT after FCR. In a phase II study, those<br />

patients who received autologous SCT after front-line FCR<br />

had an inferior outcome to patients who underwent autologous<br />

SCT before chemoimmunotherapy was available. 15<br />

Monoclonal antibodies have been used to increase the<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> elimination <strong>of</strong> minimal residual disease (MRD)<br />

after autologous SCT, ex vivo or by in vivo treatment with<br />

alemtuzumab or rituximab. 15 Alemtuzumab was used in the<br />

conditioning regimen for autologous SCT in one arm <strong>of</strong> the<br />

German CLL Study Group CLL3 trial, and 12 <strong>of</strong> 16 patients<br />

(87%) developed a skin rash between 43 and 601 days<br />

post-SCT. In seven patients, biopsy confirmed GVHD that<br />

persisted for a median duration <strong>of</strong> 517 (range, 60 to 867)<br />

days. 23 The trial was discontinued because <strong>of</strong> the TRM, but<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> alemtuzumab led to improved disease control.<br />

When alemtuzumab was used at modified dose (10 mg<br />

subcutaneously three times per week for 6 weeks) in 34<br />

patients who had a clinical response to a fludarabine-based<br />

regimen, the CR rate improved from 35% to 79.5% with 56%<br />

achieving eradication <strong>of</strong> MRD. 24 Peripheral blood stem cell<br />

collection was subsequently successfully performed in 92%.<br />

Most studies reported relatively short follow-up and therefore<br />

focus mostly on TRM early post-SCT, but late consequences—particularly<br />

development <strong>of</strong> secondary<br />

myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML)—<br />

are <strong>of</strong> concern. Among 65 previously untreated patients who<br />

were treated with fludarabine followed by autologous SCT,<br />

eight developed MDS/AML, with a 5-year actuarial risk <strong>of</strong><br />

12% developing MDS/AML after autologous SCT. 16 Longterm<br />

follow-up reports a high incidence <strong>of</strong> other solid tumors<br />

in 31 (19%) patients. 15<br />

Myeloablative Allogeneic SCT<br />

Median<br />

Age (y)<br />

FCR<br />

M. D. Anderson 8 300 57 51 at 5 y 77 at 6 y<br />

CLL8 9 408 61 65 at 3 y 87 at 3 y<br />

Autologous SCT<br />

European Intergroup 20 112 54 42 at 5 y 86 at 5 y<br />

SFGM-TC/GFLLC 21 52 in CR 56 79.8 at 3 y 96 at 3 y<br />

46 not CR 48.9 at 3 y 82 at 3 y<br />

GOELAMS 22 43 Upper age<br />

limit 60<br />

The major advantage <strong>of</strong> allogeneic SCT is the potential<br />

for a GVL effect. There is strong evidence for a GVL effect in<br />

CLL as demonstrated by a decreased risk <strong>of</strong> relapse in<br />

patients with chronic GVHD, increased risk <strong>of</strong> relapse in<br />

EFS<br />

(%)<br />

PFS 53 at<br />

6.5 y<br />

JOHN G. GRIBBEN<br />

OS<br />

(%)<br />

107.4 at 6.5 y<br />

Abbreviations: FCR, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; ASCT,<br />

autologous stem cell transplantation; y, years; EFS, event-free survival; OS,<br />

overall survival; SFGM-TC, Societe’ Francaise de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie<br />

Cellulaire; GFLLC, Groupe Français d’étude de la Leucémie Lymphoïde Chronique;<br />

CR, complete remission; GOELAMS, Groupe Ouest Est d’Etude des<br />

Leucémies et Autres Maladies du Sang.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!