18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TREATMENT FOR OLDER WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER<br />

should reinforce the importance <strong>of</strong> adherence to maximize<br />

treatment benefit.<br />

The adjuvant use <strong>of</strong> aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole,<br />

letrozole, exemestane) for postmenopausal women with<br />

early breast cancer has been evaluated in several studies.<br />

These studies have involved the use <strong>of</strong> aromatase inhibitors<br />

either as initial adjuvant therapy, 19 as sequential therapy<br />

after 2 to 3 years <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen, 20 or as extended therapy<br />

after 4.5 to 6 years <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen. 21 The findings <strong>of</strong> these<br />

studies are consistent in demonstrating that the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

third-generation aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal<br />

women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> patient age, is superior in decreasing the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

disease recurrence, including ipsilateral and contralateral<br />

breast cancer, and distant metastatic disease compared with<br />

tamoxifen. Additionally, sequential use <strong>of</strong> aromatase inhibitors<br />

20 or extended therapy 21 has been shown to provide an<br />

overall survival advantage compared with tamoxifen use for<br />

5 years. No survival advantage has been demonstrated with<br />

the upfront use <strong>of</strong> aromatase inhibitors for 5 years compared<br />

with tamoxifen.<br />

There are differences in the toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> aromatase<br />

inhibitors and tamoxifen. The incidence <strong>of</strong> venous thromboembolic<br />

disease, cerebrovascular events, endometrial cancer,<br />

vaginal bleeding, and hot flashes are less likely to be<br />

associated with aromatase inhibitors than tamoxifen,<br />

whereas the incidence <strong>of</strong> musculoskeletal pain, osteoporosis,<br />

and bone fractures have been found to be higher with<br />

aromatase inhibitors. 19 Emerging data also suggest that<br />

aromatase inhibitors may be associated with a small but<br />

higher risk <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular events compared with tamoxifen,<br />

22,23 but not compared with placebo. 24 In a metaanalysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> seven trials in which aromatase inhibitors were<br />

compared with tamoxifen, longer duration <strong>of</strong> aromatase<br />

inhibitor use or aromatase inhibitor use alone for 5 years<br />

was associated with a higher likelihood <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular<br />

events compared with tamoxifen alone (odds ratio [OR] �<br />

1.26, 95% CI 1.10–1.43). 25 Because studies <strong>of</strong> aromatase<br />

inhibitors have not included extensive follow-up, the full<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular disease and<br />

coronary heart risk remains to be determined.<br />

Although there is little evidence <strong>of</strong> age-related differences<br />

in the benefits <strong>of</strong> aromatase inhibitors for postmenopausal<br />

women, results <strong>of</strong> studies designed to examine age-related<br />

differences in the pattern <strong>of</strong> toxicity have been mixed. In<br />

general, the incidence <strong>of</strong> grade 3–5 nonfracture-related adverse<br />

events is higher among women 75 and older than<br />

among women less than 75 years. 26 However, a comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> life and the side effect pr<strong>of</strong>ile for women who<br />

participated in MA-17, a study in which 5 years <strong>of</strong> letrozole<br />

was compared with placebo, showed no age-related differences<br />

in side effects. 24 The long-term consequences and<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> these side effects and any-age-related differences<br />

remain to be well characterized.<br />

Based on the results from recent studies that favor aromatase<br />

inhibitors over tamoxifen, current guidelines recommend<br />

that aromatase inhibitors should be <strong>of</strong>fered to all<br />

postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive<br />

early stage breast cancer, either alone, as sequential therapy<br />

after 2–3 years <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen. Given the lack <strong>of</strong> overall<br />

survival advantage associated with aromatase inhibitor use<br />

for 5 years, for women with pre-existing heart disease or<br />

bone loss, use <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen for 5 years or a switching<br />

strategy is a reasonable approach. For women with low<br />

grade, node-negative tumors 1 cm or smaller, endocrine<br />

therapy may be optional and observation acceptable, although<br />

the risks and benefits should be discussed with the<br />

patient.<br />

Adjuvant Chemotherapy<br />

Cytotoxic chemotherapy can be considered for older<br />

women with either node-positive or high-risk node-negative<br />

disease, particularly, triple-negative breast cancer. An<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> literature has demonstrated the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

adjuvant chemotherapy for younger women, with benefit<br />

decreasing as age increases. The EBCTCG overview analysis,<br />

13 which has 15 years <strong>of</strong> follow-up data, demonstrated<br />

that adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the annual risk <strong>of</strong><br />

recurrence by 37% and 19%, for women younger than 50 and<br />

50 to 69, respectively. The annual risk <strong>of</strong> death was reduced<br />

by 30% and 12%, for women younger than 50 and 50 to 69,<br />

respectively. The benefit <strong>of</strong> adjuvant chemotherapy for<br />

women with early stage breast cancer over age 70 was<br />

difficult to assess in the EBCTCG overview analysis<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the paucity <strong>of</strong> randomized trials that incorporated<br />

this age group. Of 29,000 women included in 60<br />

adjuvant polychemotherapy trials, 4% were 70 and older.<br />

This paucity <strong>of</strong> data has prevented definitive estimates<br />

regarding the magnitude <strong>of</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy for<br />

women age 70 and older. In addition, with advancing age,<br />

organ function and performance status decline, and comorbidities<br />

increase, making the risks associated with chemotherapy<br />

even greater. Moreover, the risk reductions for<br />

chemotherapy are lower for postmenopausal women than for<br />

premenopausal women, although the reasons are unclear.<br />

Coupled with the apparent decline in the efficacy <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy<br />

with age is the increased risk <strong>of</strong> death from competing<br />

illnesses (comorbidity), leading to additional decline in<br />

the benefit from chemotherapy. As a result <strong>of</strong> all these<br />

factors, older women with early stage breast cancer receive<br />

adjuvant chemotherapy considerably less frequently than do<br />

younger women.<br />

However, a growing body <strong>of</strong> evidence suggests that adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy leads to improved survival outcomes<br />

for older women with breast cancer, particularly older<br />

women with hormone receptor-negative and node-positive<br />

breast cancer. A retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> four Cancer and<br />

Leukemia Group B (CALGB) randomized clinical trials<br />

showed superior disease-free and overall survival benefits<br />

with the use <strong>of</strong> more aggressive chemotherapy (compared<br />

with less aggressive chemotherapy), among 6,487 women<br />

with node-positive breast cancer in all age groups, including<br />

70 and older. 27 This benefit, however, came at the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> toxicity in older women, with older women<br />

more likely to discontinue treatment and to have an increased<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> treatment-related mortality. Additionally,<br />

data from large population studies have demonstrated a<br />

survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for older<br />

women with hormone-negative or node-positive early stage<br />

breast cancer. 28,29<br />

Results from randomized controlled clinical trials that<br />

have specifically focused on older women with breast cancer,<br />

though scant, have helped to fill the gap on chemotherapy<br />

benefit for older women with early stage breast cancer.<br />

In the largest study in this population to date, a CALGB and<br />

Breast Cancer Intergroup study, 33 patients 65 and older<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!