18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Resection and Thermal Ablation <strong>of</strong> Liver Metastases<br />

We have reported the results <strong>of</strong> a prospective study <strong>of</strong><br />

outcomes after surgical treatment <strong>of</strong> CRC liver metastases<br />

using hepatic resection only, RFA plus resection for multiple<br />

tumors, or RFA only when patients had tumor in an unresectable<br />

site in the liver. The study group consisted <strong>of</strong> 348<br />

consecutive patients with CRC liver metastases and no<br />

extrahepatic disease who were treated for cure with hepatic<br />

resection with or without RFA and 70 patients who were<br />

found at laparotomy to have liver-only disease (but were not<br />

candidates for curative treatment based on involvement <strong>of</strong><br />

too many liver segments) as outlined in Fig. 1. 8 An example<br />

<strong>of</strong> a case in which a combined approach <strong>of</strong> resection and<br />

ablation was used is illustrated in Fig. 2.<br />

The 5-year overall survival rate among the 348 patients<br />

treated with curative intent was 44%. Survival with resection<br />

alone (58% at 5 years) was significantly greater than<br />

that with either resection plus ablation (28%) or RFA<br />

alone (19%, p � 0.001), with no marked difference among<br />

the approaches, including RFA. The overall 4-year survival<br />

rates after resection, RFA plus resection, and RFA<br />

KEY POINTS<br />

● Management <strong>of</strong> colorectal cancer liver metastases<br />

requires a multidisciplinary team approach.<br />

● Patients should be considered candidates for resection<br />

whenever possible, regardless <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong><br />

metastatic lesions.<br />

● Modern systemic chemotherapy can produce response<br />

sufficient to convert unresectable liver metastases<br />

to resectable disease in some patients.<br />

● Chemotherapy can be hepatotoxic, so careful selection<br />

<strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant therapy agents and duration<br />

must be considered.<br />

● Resection provides better long-term survival probability<br />

compared with thermal tumor ablation<br />

techniques.<br />

210<br />

alone were 65%, 36%, and 22%, respectively (p � 0.0001);<br />

however, 4-year survival rates with resection plus RFA<br />

and RFA only were still substantial and significantly improved<br />

over that achieved with chemotherapy alone (5%) in<br />

the 70 patients not treated with resection or RFA (p �<br />

0.0017).<br />

Systemic Chemotherapy<br />

STEVEN A. CURLEY<br />

Fig. 1. Treatment <strong>of</strong> 418 consecutive<br />

patients with liver-only CRC metastases<br />

at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. A total<br />

<strong>of</strong> 348 patients (83.3%) were treated<br />

for cure with hepatic resection only, RFA<br />

plus resection, or RFA only. Seventy patients<br />

were found to have disease too<br />

extensive for curative therapy and underwent<br />

chemotherapy (systemic, intraarterial<br />

chemotherapy via a hepatic<br />

artery infusion pump placed at the index<br />

laparotomy or intra-arterial plus<br />

systemic chemotherapy).<br />

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer;<br />

RFA, radi<strong>of</strong>requency ablation.<br />

Systemic chemotherapy can convert unresectable CRC<br />

liver metastases to resectable disease in some patients, and<br />

response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with<br />

resectable disease is an important prognostic indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

improved probability <strong>of</strong> long-term survival. 2,9,10 The use <strong>of</strong><br />

neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable CRC<br />

liver metastases must be carefully considered in multidisciplinary<br />

treatment planning involving medical oncologists<br />

and hepatobiliary surgical oncologists. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

regimens that are based on oxaliplatin (Eloxatin;<br />

San<strong>of</strong>i Aventis) or irinotecan (Camptosar; Pfizer) can produce<br />

specific types <strong>of</strong> liver injury. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy<br />

was reported to cause sinusoidal obstruction, venoocclusive<br />

lesions in the microvasculature <strong>of</strong> nontumoral<br />

liver, and perisinusoidal fibrosis in more than half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. 11 Both irinotecan<br />

and oxaliplatin treatment have been found to produce nonalcoholic<br />

steatohepatitis (NASH), and the severity <strong>of</strong> NASH<br />

is greater in patients who are also obese. 12 Hepatic steatosis<br />

or steatohepatitis was identified as an independent variable<br />

that predicted increased perioperative morbidity and mortality<br />

rates in a retrospective study <strong>of</strong> 135 patients undergoing<br />

resection <strong>of</strong> CRC liver metastases. 13 Data suggest that<br />

steatosis impairs hepatic regeneration after resection, and<br />

the rates <strong>of</strong> liver insufficiency and hyperbilirubinemia are<br />

higher for patients with hepatic steatosis than for patients<br />

with normal livers.<br />

A multi-institution review <strong>of</strong> 406 patients who underwent<br />

resection <strong>of</strong> CRC liver metastases and had the severity <strong>of</strong><br />

NASH and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease scored on a<br />

standardized system was completed recently. 14,15 Preoperative<br />

chemotherapy was administered to 241 patients (61%),<br />

and 158 patients (39%) received no neoadjuvant treatment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!