18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RADIOTHERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC HODGKIN LYMPHOMA<br />

response to dose-intensive chemotherapy regimens. These<br />

studies have been facilitated by assessment <strong>of</strong> interim or end<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemotherapy response based on anatomic or functional<br />

changes on computed tomography or functional imaging like<br />

positron emission tomography. The Pediatric <strong>Oncology</strong><br />

Group utilized a response-based therapy utilizing dosedense<br />

ABVE-PC (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine,<br />

etoposide-prednisone, cyclophosphamide) for patients with<br />

unfavorable advanced-stage disease in combination with 21<br />

Gy IFRT. 18 The dose-dense approach permitted reduction in<br />

chemotherapy exposure in 63% <strong>of</strong> patients who achieved a<br />

rapid early response to three ABVE-PC cycles. Five-year<br />

EFS was comparable for rapid early responders (86%) and<br />

slow early responders (83%) treated with three and five<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> ABVE-PC, respectively, followed by 21 Gy IFRT.<br />

The CCG (CCG-59704) evaluated response-adapted therapy<br />

featuring four cycles <strong>of</strong> the dose-intensive BEACOPP<br />

(bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine,<br />

procarbazine, prednisone) regimen followed by a<br />

gender-tailored consolidation for pediatric patients with<br />

stage IIB, IIIB with bulk disease, and IV HL. 19 For rapid<br />

early responding girls, an additional four courses <strong>of</strong> COPP/<br />

ABV (without IFRT) were given in an effort to reduce breast<br />

cancer risk. Rapid early responding boys received two cycles<br />

<strong>of</strong> ABVD followed by IFRT. Slow early responders received<br />

four additional courses <strong>of</strong> BEACOPP and IFRT. Rapid early<br />

response (defined by resolution <strong>of</strong> B symptoms and greater<br />

than 70% reduction in tumor volume) was achieved by 74%<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients after four BEACOPP cycles and 5-year EFS<br />

among the cohort is 94% (median follow-up 6.3 years). 19<br />

Results from this study support that early intensification<br />

followed by less intense response-based therapy results in<br />

high EFS. However, the potential for late treatment effects<br />

on cardiopulmonary and gonadal function have not been<br />

evaluated.<br />

Radiation Therapy in Refractory/Relapsed HL<br />

The generally excellent outcome <strong>of</strong> children and adolescents<br />

with HL limits opportunities to evaluate retrieval<br />

therapy. This is particularly true in regard to the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

using RT in the setting <strong>of</strong> refractory/relapsed disease. Uniformly,<br />

chemotherapy is the recommended retrieval therapy,<br />

with the choice <strong>of</strong> specific agents, dose-intensity, and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cycles determined by the initial therapy, disease<br />

characteristics at progression/relapse, and response to retrieval<br />

therapy. In children with localized favorable (relapse<br />

after 12 months after completing therapy) disease recurrences<br />

whose original therapy involved reduced cycles <strong>of</strong><br />

risk-adapted therapy, IRFT consolidation may be <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

following treatment with more intensive conventional chemotherapy.<br />

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation<br />

(autoHCT) is the recommended approach for patients who<br />

develop refractory/relapsed disease during or within 1 year<br />

after completing therapy. 20 Results <strong>of</strong> investigations<br />

(largely comprised <strong>of</strong> adult patients) evaluating the use <strong>of</strong><br />

IFRT immediately before or after transplant have been<br />

conflicting in their support <strong>of</strong> a potential benefit conferred by<br />

RT. 21-23 However, most studies are limited by their retrospective<br />

nature, nonrandom treatment assignments, and<br />

small patient numbers. Nevertheless, IFRT is <strong>of</strong>ten used to<br />

consolidate local control in individuals with refractory/recurrent<br />

disease, especially in those who have limited or bulky<br />

sites <strong>of</strong> disease recurrence or persistent disease that does<br />

not completely respond to salvage chemotherapy. In the<br />

latter, local radiotherapy can be considered to promote local<br />

disease resolution before autoHCT rather than as consolidation<br />

following autoHCT. However, concerns regarding toxicity<br />

have prevented the use <strong>of</strong> IFRT as a standard adjuvant to<br />

high-dose chemotherapy and autoHCT in HL. Prospective<br />

trials are needed to definitely establish the long-term risks<br />

and survival benefits provided by inclusion <strong>of</strong> RT in salvage<br />

therapy approaches.<br />

Advances in the Delivery <strong>of</strong> Radiation<br />

As previously stated, contemporary protocols are testing<br />

field reductions from involved lymph node regions to involved<br />

nodal sites. In addition, the standard technique for<br />

radiation delivery in pediatric HL is a two-dimensional<br />

CT-based approach. However, three-dimensional conformal<br />

radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated RT<br />

(IMRT), or proton therapy may be <strong>of</strong>fer the ability to reduce<br />

exposure to critical normal tissues such as heart, lungs, and<br />

developing breast tissue. Uncertainty exists about the potential<br />

for increased late effects from IMRT, particularly<br />

secondary malignancy, bacause IMRT results in a lower<br />

dose to a larger volume compared with conventional techniques.<br />

Unfortunately, any benefits <strong>of</strong> lower doses to critical<br />

organs, or changes (either an increase or decrease) in the<br />

potential for a subsequent malignancy, will not be testable<br />

for many years.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> RT in the treatment <strong>of</strong> pediatric HL has<br />

evolved considerably over the last 50 years, primarily motivated<br />

by the desire to avoid its adverse long-term effects.<br />

Although elimination <strong>of</strong> RT has been a key focus <strong>of</strong> contemporary<br />

trials, this modality continues to play an important<br />

role in optimizing survival outcomes for many children and<br />

adolescents with the disease. For those with low-risk HL,<br />

the addition <strong>of</strong> low-dose IFRT permits reduction in chemotherapy<br />

duration or intensity and thus the potential doserelated<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and<br />

bleomycin that may preserve cardiopulmonary and gonadal<br />

function. For those with intermediate/high-risk HL, the<br />

superior disease-free survival demonstrated by some trials<br />

may ultimately translate into a survival benefit by avoiding<br />

the need for more toxic salvage therapy. In the setting <strong>of</strong><br />

disease with suboptimal chemotherapy response, RT consolidation<br />

provides an effective alternative modality to enhance<br />

tumor control. Until the availability <strong>of</strong> validated biologically<br />

based prognostic factors, the inclusion <strong>of</strong> RT consolidation in<br />

pediatric HL treatment regimens will continued to be guided<br />

by prognostic factors at diagnosis correlated with disease<br />

burden and chemotherapy responsiveness as assessed by<br />

functional imaging. For patients who require RT to optimize<br />

disease control, advances in radiation technology and reduced<br />

volume radiation strategies are anticipated to greatly<br />

reduce exposure to normal tissues and the subsequent risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> late RT-associated toxicity. 24<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Research grant support: Dr. Hudson is supported in part by<br />

the Cancer Center Support (CORE) grant CA 21765 from the<br />

National Cancer Institute and by the <strong>American</strong> Lebanese Syrian<br />

Associated Charities (ALSAC).<br />

619

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!