18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management <strong>of</strong> Human Papillomavirus–Induced<br />

Oropharynx Cancer<br />

Overview: Oropharynx cancer (OPC) constitutes the most<br />

common location for squamous-cell head and neck cancer,<br />

and most OPC is caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV).<br />

Early-stage (<strong>American</strong> Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC]<br />

stage I and II) disease should be treated with single modality<br />

surgery or radiotherapy whenever possible. More advanced<br />

presentations generally require combined-modality therapy<br />

with various combinations <strong>of</strong> surgery, radiotherapy, and che-<br />

THE VAST majority (� 90%) <strong>of</strong> squamous-cell head and<br />

neck cancers (HNCs) that are induced by the human<br />

papillomavirus (HPV) originate within the oropharynx. This<br />

anatomic region comprises the tonsils, s<strong>of</strong>t palate, and base<br />

<strong>of</strong> tongue. Understanding the general management principles<br />

<strong>of</strong> oropharynx cancer (OPC) is central to comprehending<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> new therapeutic options for HPVpositive<br />

OPC. The first step in this process is to recognize<br />

that OPC can be clinically divided into early-stage and<br />

advanced-stage presentations. Early-stage presentations<br />

typically include T1N0 and T2N0 presentations (stage I and<br />

II), whereas advanced-stage disease is more heterogeneous,<br />

with presentations ranging from T1N1 to T4N3 (stage III to<br />

IVB).<br />

The fundamental management tenet for early-stage disease<br />

is to adopt a strategy that maximizes the likelihood<br />

that the disease can be treated with single-modality therapy—either<br />

surgery or radiotherapy (RT) alone. These two<br />

modalities have equivalent efficacy in the early-stage setting.<br />

The rationale for the use <strong>of</strong> a single modality is to<br />

minimize morbidity, which invariably increases in step with<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> multiple therapeutic modalities. Surgical management<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> resection <strong>of</strong> the primary site, most <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

with an ipsilateral neck dissection, whereas definitive RT<br />

treats the same primary tumor site and ipsilateral lymph<br />

nodes as surgery. The advent <strong>of</strong> minimally invasive surgical<br />

techniques including transoral robotic resection and transoral<br />

laser excision and the increasing adoption <strong>of</strong> intensitymodulated<br />

RT (IMRT) have all led to substantial reductions<br />

in the long-term functional morbidity <strong>of</strong> treating early-stage<br />

OPC. The National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network<br />

(NCCN) Head and Neck Cancer Guidelines provide additional<br />

detail regarding the choices for radiation fractionation<br />

schemes (www.nccn.org). Postoperative irradiation for<br />

early-stage disease should be used only on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

adverse histopathology including perineural invasion, positive<br />

margins, the presence <strong>of</strong> multiply involved lymph nodes,<br />

or the presence <strong>of</strong> extracapsular nodal extension. Conversely,<br />

when RT is used as the primary modality, surgery<br />

should be used only for the presence <strong>of</strong> persistent disease or<br />

for the salvage <strong>of</strong> recurrent disease. Primary RT is usually<br />

preferred for tumors originating in the base <strong>of</strong> tongue or<br />

extending from the tonsil onto the s<strong>of</strong>t palate close to the<br />

midline because <strong>of</strong> the higher risk <strong>of</strong> occult contralateral<br />

lymph node involvement, which necessitates treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

both sides <strong>of</strong> the neck. These regions can usually be treated<br />

with less long-term functional morbidity by using RT as<br />

opposed to bilateral neck dissection.<br />

368<br />

By David Brizel, MD<br />

motherapy or molecularly targeted therapy. All <strong>of</strong> these approaches<br />

expose patients to a substantial risk <strong>of</strong> serious<br />

long-term functional morbidity. HPV-induced OPC has a very<br />

favorable prognosis compared with its HPV-negative counterpart<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> the treatment platform that is used.<br />

Current clinical trials are investigating the concept <strong>of</strong> therapeutic<br />

deintensification with the dual objectives <strong>of</strong> decreasing<br />

toxicity and maintaining efficacy.<br />

T1N1 and T2N1 presentations are classified as stage III<br />

and technically advanced disease, but the management<br />

principles for stage I/II presentations are still generally<br />

applicable, namely treatment with primary surgery or RT as<br />

single modality with an understanding, however, that the<br />

larger burden <strong>of</strong> disease increases the probability that the<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> adjuvant neck dissection or postoperative irradiation<br />

will be necessary. Traditionally, primary nonsurgical<br />

management has assumed the most prominent role for the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> more extensive stage III and IV presentations,<br />

with surgery being used more in an adjuvant setting<br />

(neck dissection or salvage role for residual/recurrent disease<br />

at the primary site). Three different strategies can<br />

be considered as standards <strong>of</strong> care for management <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced-stage disease: RT alone using modified fractionation,<br />

RT plus concurrent epidermal growth factor receptor<br />

(EGFR) blockade, and RT and concurrent chemotherapy.<br />

Randomized trials have confirmed improvements in locoregional<br />

control with the use <strong>of</strong> both hyperfractionation<br />

and accelerated fractionation by means <strong>of</strong> improvement in<br />

locoregional disease control. 1-3 A recent meta-analysis from<br />

Bourhis and colleagues evaluated updated individual patient’s<br />

data from 6,515 patients in 15 randomized trials <strong>of</strong><br />

patients with stage III/IV oropharynx and larynx carcinoma.<br />

4 It showed an 8.2% absolute difference in 5-year<br />

survival for patients who received altered fractionation RT<br />

compared with conventional once-daily RT (36.7% vs. 28.5%,<br />

respectively).<br />

EGFR is overexpressed in the majority <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Bonner and colleagues<br />

conducted a prospective randomized trial that<br />

tested the value <strong>of</strong> adding EGFR blockade to a course <strong>of</strong><br />

RT. 5,6 Four hundred twenty-four patients were randomly<br />

assigned to receive either RT alone or RT plus weekly<br />

cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to the EGFR<br />

receptor. The majority <strong>of</strong> these patients had oropharynx<br />

primary tumors, and 75% <strong>of</strong> them received treatment with<br />

accelerated or hyperfractionated irradiation. The RT/cetuximab<br />

patients had significant improvements in median survival<br />

(49 months vs. 29 months; hazard ratio [HR] � 0.73;<br />

p � 0.02), and 5-year overall survival (46% vs. 36%). Subset<br />

From the Duke University Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.<br />

Author’s disclosure <strong>of</strong> potential conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest are found at the end <strong>of</strong> this article.<br />

Address reprint requests to David Brizel, MD, Duke University Cancer Institute, Box 3085<br />

DUMC, Durham, NC 27710; email: david.brizel@duke.edu.<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> by <strong>American</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Oncology</strong>.<br />

1092-9118/10/1-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!