18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHEMOTHERAPY FOR OVARIAN CANCER<br />

which patients with stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, or primary<br />

peritoneal cancer, were allocated to receive either primary<br />

debulking surgery followed by eight cycles <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy<br />

or to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles <strong>of</strong><br />

chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery plus<br />

an additional four cycles <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. This study is<br />

designed as a noninferiority trial with 300 patients in total.<br />

This trial completed accrual in 2011.<br />

The ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant chemotherapy is to<br />

minimize the invasiveness <strong>of</strong> surgical treatment without<br />

jeopardizing its efficacy. The most successful example is<br />

breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.<br />

In the EORTC55791 trial, the survival was same between<br />

primary debulking surgery group and neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

group, but it was not fully analyzed how they could<br />

minimize the invasiveness <strong>of</strong> surgery between primary and<br />

interval surgery.<br />

The remaining questions on neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

include: 1) accurate selection <strong>of</strong> candidate patients, 2) duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemotherapy before interval debulking surgery, 3)<br />

selection and duration <strong>of</strong> adjuvant therapy after interval<br />

debulking surgery, and finally 4) whether the failure to<br />

achieve optimal cytoreductive surgery is to the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surgeon’s skill or biology <strong>of</strong> the cancer.<br />

For the first question, JCOG investigators conducted a<br />

prospective feasibility study on the selection <strong>of</strong> the patients<br />

who would be suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

Authors’ Disclosures <strong>of</strong> Potential Conflicts <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

Author<br />

Employment or<br />

Leadership<br />

Positions<br />

Consultant or<br />

Advisory Role<br />

Keiichi Fujiwara Amgen;<br />

Boehringer<br />

Ingelheim;<br />

GlaxoSmithKline;<br />

Zeria Pharma<br />

Noriyuki Katsumata*<br />

Takashi Onda*<br />

*No relevant relationships to disclose.<br />

1. Stuart GC, Kitchener H, Bacon M, et al. 2010 Gynecologic Cancer<br />

InterGroup (GCIG) consensus statement on clinical trials in ovarian cancer:<br />

report from the Fourth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference. Int J Gynecol<br />

Cancer. 2011;21:750-755.<br />

2. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, et al. Incorporation <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab<br />

in the primary treatment <strong>of</strong> ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:<br />

2473-2483.<br />

3. Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, et al. A phase 3 trial <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab<br />

in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2484-2496.<br />

4. Thigpen T, duBois A, McAlpine J, et al. First-line therapy in ovarian<br />

cancer trials. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:756-1762.<br />

5. Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or<br />

primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:<br />

943-953.<br />

6. Norton L. Theoretical concepts and the emerging role <strong>of</strong> taxanes in<br />

adjuvant therapy. Oncologist. 2001; 3:30-35 (suppl).<br />

7. Seidman AD, Berry D, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized phase III trial <strong>of</strong><br />

weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer,<br />

with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to<br />

trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results <strong>of</strong> Cancer and<br />

Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1642-1649.<br />

8. Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S, et al. Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1663-1671.<br />

(JCOG0206). 21 They assessed the accuracy <strong>of</strong> clinical diagnosis<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> imaging tests, cytology from ascites,<br />

pleural effusion or tumor, and tumor markers (cancer antigen<br />

[CA]-125 � 200 U/mL and Carcinoembryonic antigen<br />

[CEA] � 20 ng/mL). The diagnosis was confirmed by diagnostic<br />

laparoscopy and these results showed that patients<br />

can be correctly diagnosed as having ovarian, fallopian tube,<br />

or primary peritoneal carcinoma with greater than 90%<br />

accuracy by clinical diagnoses on the basis <strong>of</strong> findings<br />

including cytology, according to Bayesian statistical methods.<br />

Other questions, however, have not been investigated<br />

prospectively. We can hypothesize that the greater the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cycles <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the less<br />

invasive the interval surgery would be because the disseminated<br />

tumor could be eliminated by the chemotherapy.<br />

However, meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> retrospective studies reported<br />

that increasing the number <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy cycles before<br />

interval surgery would negatively affect survival. 16,22 It is<br />

hoped that these important questions will be answered<br />

prospectively in the near future.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The important concept <strong>of</strong> dose-dense chemotherapy and<br />

neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment <strong>of</strong> ovarian<br />

cancer has been tested in phase III trials 5,9 and is a great<br />

influence on clinical practice.<br />

Stock<br />

Ownership Honoraria<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bristol-Myers<br />

Squibb; Chugai<br />

Pharma;<br />

Janssen<br />

<strong>Oncology</strong>;<br />

Nihonkayaku;<br />

San<strong>of</strong>i; Taiho<br />

Pharmaceutical<br />

Research<br />

Funding<br />

Expert<br />

Testimony<br />

Other<br />

Remuneration<br />

9. Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F, et al. Dose-dense paclitaxel once<br />

a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian<br />

cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:<br />

1331-1338.<br />

10. Bookman MA. Dose-dense chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.<br />

Lancet. 2009;374:1303-1305.<br />

11. Bonilla L, Ben-Aharon I, Vidal L, et al. Dose-dense chemotherapy in<br />

nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1845-1854.<br />

12. Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Mamounas EP, et al. Recommendations<br />

from an International Consensus Conference on the current status and<br />

future <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast Cancer. Ann Surg<br />

Oncol. Epub 2011 Dec 23.<br />

13. Shelley MD, Kumar S, Wilt T, et al. A systematic review and metaanalysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> randomised trials <strong>of</strong> neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised<br />

and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:9-17.<br />

14. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a<br />

systematic review and meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> individual patient data from 21<br />

randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:2470-2486.<br />

15. Onda T, Yoshikawa H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian<br />

cancer: overview <strong>of</strong> outcomes and unanswered questions. Expert Rev<br />

Anticancer Ther. 2011;11:1053-1067.<br />

16. Bristow RE, Chi DS. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and<br />

353

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!