18.12.2012 Views

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

2012 EDUCATIONAL BOOK - American Society of Clinical Oncology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL ADVANCES IN GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY<br />

went post radiation surgery (7 patients), survival was significantly<br />

better. 9<br />

Systematic inguin<strong>of</strong>emoral lymphadenectomy comprises<br />

resection <strong>of</strong> superficial inguinal lymph nodes and deep<br />

femoral nodes. Although current guidelines recommend at<br />

least 6 nodes per groin be removed, systematic lymphadenectomy<br />

is associated with substantial morbidity, such as<br />

leg edema, lymphocysts, wound breakdown, and erysipelas.<br />

To avoid these complications, the use <strong>of</strong> sentinel node<br />

dissection in vulvar cancer has been investigated. Sentinel<br />

nodes were studied in a large, prospective, multicenter study<br />

(Groningen International Study on Sentinel nodes in Vulvar<br />

cancer [GROINSS-V]), which included 403 women with<br />

unifocal vulvar cancer stage I or II, tumor size less than<br />

4 cm, stromal invasion greater than 1 mm, and clinically<br />

negative lymph nodes. 10 Lymphadenectomy was not performed<br />

in women with sentinel node–negative cancer. Groin<br />

recurrences occurred in 2.3% <strong>of</strong> patients, with a median<br />

follow-up <strong>of</strong> 35 months. Overall disease-specific survival was<br />

97% after 3 years, and morbidity was substantially reduced.<br />

These results are equivalent to results <strong>of</strong> systematic inguin<strong>of</strong>emoral<br />

lymphadenectomy from an oncologic point <strong>of</strong><br />

view.<br />

Vaginal Cancer<br />

Primary cancer <strong>of</strong> the vagina is rare and accounts for<br />

approximately 2% <strong>of</strong> all cancers <strong>of</strong> the female genital tract.<br />

Most women are older than 60 years, and only 10% to 15%<br />

are younger than 50 years. The most common type <strong>of</strong> vaginal<br />

cancer is squamous carcinoma (80% to 90%) and adenocarcinoma<br />

(4% to 10%). Infection with HPV-16 is believed to be<br />

an important etiologic factor. Prognosis is dependent on age,<br />

histologic type, and tumor stage. The optimal treatment is<br />

still controversial because <strong>of</strong> the rarity <strong>of</strong> the disease and<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate clinical trials. Standard therapy is radiation,<br />

either alone or concurrently with platinum-based<br />

chemotherapy. The advantage <strong>of</strong> radiation is the preservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the vagina, although the vagina does not always<br />

remain fully functional.<br />

KEY POINTS<br />

● The modern management <strong>of</strong> vulvar cancer is to distinguish<br />

between central and lateral lesions and to<br />

adapt surgery and radiation to reduce morbidity and<br />

enhance quality <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

● Management <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer has not changed substantially<br />

in the past 10 to 20 years; however, approaches<br />

to cervical cancer prevention have<br />

undergone a re-evaluation at both the primary and<br />

secondary prevention levels.<br />

● The surgical staging <strong>of</strong> endometrial cancers has enabled<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> adjuvant therapies to be tailored to<br />

the individual patient.<br />

● Current novel therapies undergoing trials bring hope<br />

to the long stagnant progress in the management <strong>of</strong><br />

ovarian cancer.<br />

● Quality <strong>of</strong> life in the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

gynecological malignant tumors should inform all<br />

treatment decisions.<br />

Cervical Cancer<br />

The most noteworthy advances in cervical cancer in the<br />

past 15 years have been the exploration <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />

approaches to cytologic testing and colposcopy for the prevention<br />

<strong>of</strong> cervical cancer in developing countries. In addition,<br />

the approach to screening in developed countries has<br />

changed from conventional cytologic testing to the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> liquid-based cytologic and HPV DNA testing. In fact,<br />

many molecular tests to increase the sensitivity and specificity<br />

for the detection <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer precursors are<br />

currently undergoing clinical trials.<br />

The potential utility <strong>of</strong> HPV DNA testing was shown in a<br />

randomized trial conducted in South Africa. 11 This trial <strong>of</strong><br />

more than 6,500 unscreened women, aged 35 to 65 years,<br />

showed a substantial reduction <strong>of</strong> high-grade cervical cancer<br />

precursors in women who screened positive with Hybrid<br />

Capture 2 (Qiagen Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) for high-risk<br />

types <strong>of</strong> HPV DNA and who underwent treatment with<br />

cryotherapy, and this reduction was sustained for 36<br />

months. After 36 months the decrease in the cumulative<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> grade 2 or higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia<br />

in the HPV treatment arm compared with the<br />

control (delayed treatment) arm was 1.5% compared with<br />

5.6% (difference, 4.1%; p � 0.001). The difference, however,<br />

in the visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) treatment<br />

group compared with the control arm was significantly less<br />

(3.8% vs. 5.6%; difference, 1.8%; p � 0.002). In India,<br />

Sankaranarayanan and colleagues 12 screened 131,746<br />

healthy women who were randomly assigned to one <strong>of</strong><br />

four groups: screening by HPV testing, cytologic testing,<br />

VIA, or no screening (standard <strong>of</strong> care). There was a<br />

reduction in the numbers <strong>of</strong> advanced cancers and cancer<br />

deaths in the HPV treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95%<br />

CI, 0.32 to 0.69) compared with no reductions in the VIA or<br />

the cytologic testing treatment groups. These studies and<br />

others conducted in developed countries suggest that HPV<br />

DNA testing has the potential to substantially reduce the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> and mortality from cervical cancer. More technologically<br />

accessible and affordable tests for HPV DNA<br />

testing are awaited for implementation in low-resource<br />

settings.<br />

In developed countries, HPV DNA testing has been recommended<br />

as a primary screen in women older than 30<br />

years, with cytologic testing as a triage for women with<br />

positive test results. Only women with positive results on<br />

both tests would be referred for colposcopy and treatment. 13<br />

Other methods <strong>of</strong> triage include p16-INK4A overexpression<br />

and testing for HPV-E6/7 messenger RNA, which are still<br />

under study.<br />

The trends in terms <strong>of</strong> cervical cancer treatment include<br />

the following: (1) fertility-sparing surgery in young women<br />

with early-stage disease; (2) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy<br />

and node dissection; (3) use <strong>of</strong> sentinel nodes to<br />

prevent morbidity associated with systematic lymphadenectomy<br />

(still under study) and; (4) use <strong>of</strong> concurrent<br />

cisplatinum-based chemotherapy concurrently with radiation,<br />

which has shown substantial improvement in overall<br />

survival and disease-free survival in women with advanced<br />

disease.<br />

Although cervical cancer is a relatively rare disease in<br />

developed countries with functional screening programs,<br />

cervical cancer remains the most common cancer among<br />

331

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!