technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...
technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...
technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EFFECTS ASSESSMENT<br />
<strong>for</strong> ciliates are considered to be supplementary to the data <strong>for</strong> activated sludge or specific<br />
bacteria, i.e. no correlation exists between activated sludge <strong>and</strong> ciliate test results, neither are<br />
ciliates consistently more sensitive. The data from one ciliate species are representative <strong>for</strong> other<br />
ciliates, i.e. test data from species not dominant or not present in STPs can serve as basis <strong>for</strong> the<br />
PNEC-derivation. The function of the protozoa in STP is correlated to their growth. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
values from ciliate growth inhibition tests, preferably with Tetrahymena (cf. OECD, 1998a), are<br />
relevant <strong>for</strong> the risk assessment <strong>for</strong> STPs. Tests using other characteristics (e.g. ciliary motion,<br />
cell movement, etc.) should not serve as a basis <strong>for</strong> the PNEC-derivation.<br />
Often in<strong>for</strong>mation may also be present on individual bacterial species such as from tests with<br />
Vibrio fischeri (used in the MICROTOX test), Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens<br />
<strong>and</strong> even Escherichia coli. These tests must be considered as less relevant. The tests with P.<br />
fluorescence <strong>and</strong> E. coli (Bringmann <strong>and</strong> Kühn, 1960) cannot be used <strong>for</strong> determination of the<br />
PNECmicroorganisms as they use glucose as a substrate. Likewise, the MICROTOX test cannot be<br />
used as it uses a saltwater species. Results of the cell multiplication inhibition test with P. putida<br />
(Bringmann <strong>and</strong> Kühn, 1980) should only be used <strong>for</strong> calculation of the PNECmicroorganisms in<br />
cases where no other test results employing mixed inocula are available.<br />
In general, the aim of the assessment is the protection of the degradation <strong>and</strong> nitrification<br />
functions <strong>and</strong> process per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> efficiency of domestic <strong>and</strong> industrial STPs – as also<br />
influenced by protozoan populations. The toxicity of a substance to microorganisms in a STP is<br />
assessed by comparing the concentration of a substance in STP aeration tank with the microbial<br />
effect concentration data <strong>for</strong> that substance (see also Section 2.3.7.1). If the substance under<br />
consideration is relevant <strong>for</strong> industrial <strong>and</strong> municipal STPs the toxicity assessment should be<br />
conducted <strong>for</strong> both kinds of STPs separately. A PNECmicroorganisms should be obtained as a first<br />
step in the effects assessment <strong>for</strong> microorganisms in both domestic <strong>and</strong> industrial sewage<br />
treatment plants. The PNECmicroorganisms is usually derived from results obtained in the most<br />
sensitive test system available, regardless of whether this is a test with activated sludge, relevant<br />
bacteria or ciliated protozoa:<br />
• the PNECmicroorganisms is set equal to a NOEC from a test per<strong>for</strong>med with ‘specific bacterial<br />
populations’ like nitrifying bacteria or P. putida or from a growth inhibition test per<strong>for</strong>med<br />
with ciliated protozoa. An EC50 from this test is divided by an assessment factor of 10;<br />
• a NOEC or EC10 from other test systems like the respiration inhibition test (EU Annex V<br />
C.11; OECD 209, 1984f) is divided by an assessment factor of 10. An EC50 from this test is<br />
divided by an assessment factor of 100;<br />
• the lowest value is selected as the PNECmicroorganisms.<br />
There may be cases in which the lowest PNECmicroorganisms does not correspond to the effect value<br />
of the most sensitive test system because different AF (100 or 10) are applied to the different test<br />
systems. In these cases expert judgement should be used to decide which effect value is<br />
appropriate <strong>for</strong> the calculation of the PNECmicroorganisms. Usually the effect value of the most<br />
sensitive test system should be used as a basis <strong>for</strong> the calculation of PNECmicroorganisms employing<br />
the appropriate AF.<br />
Table 17 provides a complete listing of the test systems mentioned above, effect concentrations<br />
that are determined using them <strong>and</strong> the corresponding assessment factors.<br />
108