05.01.2013 Views

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EFFECTS ASSESSMENT<br />

bioaccumulation <strong>and</strong> biomagnification. For certain chemicals, <strong>for</strong> which the octanol/water<br />

partition coefficient cannot be measured properly, a high adsorptive capacity (of which<br />

log Kp > 3 may be an indication) can be additional evidence of bioaccumulation potential.<br />

Hydrolysis<br />

The effect of hydrolysis may be a significant factor <strong>for</strong> substances discharged mainly to the<br />

aquatic environment: the concentration of a substance in water is reduced by hydrolysis so the<br />

extent of bioconcentration in aquatic organisms would also be reduced. Where the half-life, at<br />

environmentally relevant pH values (4-9) <strong>and</strong> temperature, is less than 12 hours, it can be<br />

assumed that the rate of hydrolysis is greater than that <strong>for</strong> uptake by the exposed organisms.<br />

Hence, the likelihood of bioaccumulation is greatly reduced. In these cases, it may sometimes be<br />

appropriate to per<strong>for</strong>m a BCF test on the hydrolysis products, if identified, instead of the parent<br />

substance. However, it should be noted that, in most cases hydrolysis products are more<br />

hydrophilic <strong>and</strong> as a consequence will have a lower potential <strong>for</strong> bioaccumulation.<br />

Degradation<br />

Both biotic <strong>and</strong> abiotic degradation may lead to relatively low concentrations of a substance in<br />

the aquatic environment <strong>and</strong> thus to low concentrations in aquatic organisms. However, the<br />

uptake rate may still be greater than the rate of the degradation processes, leading to high BCF<br />

values even <strong>for</strong> readily biodegradable substances. There<strong>for</strong>e ready biodegradability does not<br />

preclude a bioaccumulation potential, but <strong>for</strong> most substances concentrations will be low in<br />

aquatic organisms.<br />

At the base-set level, only scarce in<strong>for</strong>mation on the kinetics of degradation is available. For new<br />

substances even at higher tonnages, a request <strong>for</strong> such in<strong>for</strong>mation would need to be justified; it<br />

can be requested only on a case-by-case basis at level 2. For existing substances in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

degradation kinetics may be available.<br />

If persistent metabolites are <strong>for</strong>med in substantial amounts the bioaccumulation potential of these<br />

substances should also be assessed. However, <strong>for</strong> most substances in<strong>for</strong>mation will be scarce.<br />

From experiments with mammals in<strong>for</strong>mation may be obtained on the <strong>for</strong>mation of possible<br />

metabolites, although extrapolation of results should be treated with care.<br />

Molecular mass<br />

Certain classes of substances with a molecular mass greater than 700 are not readily taken up by<br />

fish, because of possible steric hindrance at passage of gill membranes or cell membranes of<br />

respiratory organs. These substances are unlikely to bioaccumulate significantly (regardless of<br />

the log Kow-value).<br />

Summary of indications of bioaccumulation potential<br />

Taking the factors mentioned above into account will indicate whether or not there is potential<br />

<strong>for</strong> bioaccumulation. In summary: if, at base-set level, a substance:<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!