05.01.2013 Views

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EFFECTS ASSESSMENT<br />

A suite of soil tests should there<strong>for</strong>e ideally be designed to obtain data relevant to:<br />

• primary producers (plants);<br />

• consumers (<strong>for</strong> example invertebrates that represent an important group in the soil<br />

compartment);<br />

• decomposers (comprising microorganisms that play an important role in foodwebs <strong>and</strong><br />

nutrients cycling).<br />

Natural soils used in ecotoxicological tests differ in characteristics such as organic matter <strong>and</strong><br />

clay content, soil pH <strong>and</strong> soil moisture content. The bioavailability of the test compound, <strong>and</strong><br />

there<strong>for</strong>e the toxicity observed, is influenced by these soil properties. This means that results<br />

from different test soils cannot be compared directly. As far as possible, toxicity tests should be<br />

conducted in conditions (as regards the nature of the soil, its organic content <strong>and</strong> any other<br />

parameter that could influence the bioavailability of the substance) where the test substance is<br />

bioavailable to the tests organism(s). However, if possible data should be normalized using<br />

relationships that describe the bioavailability of chemicals in soils. Results are converted to a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard soil, which is defined as a soil with an organic matter content of 3.4% (see Section<br />

2.3.4). For non-ionic organic compounds it is assumed that bioavailability is determined by the<br />

organic matter content only. NOECs <strong>and</strong> L(E)C50s are corrected according to the <strong>for</strong>mula :<br />

Explanation of symbols<br />

116<br />

NOEC or L(E)C = NOEC or L(E)C Fom<br />

50(st<strong>and</strong>ard)<br />

50(exp) •<br />

Fom<br />

NOEC or NOEC or L(E)C50 in experiment [mg . kg -1 ]<br />

L(E)C50exp<br />

soil(st<strong>and</strong>ard)<br />

soil( exp)<br />

Fomsoil(st<strong>and</strong>ard) fraction organic matter in st<strong>and</strong>ard soil [kg . kg-1 ] Table 5<br />

Fomsoil(exp) fraction organic matter in experimental soil [kg . kg-1 ]<br />

NOEC or NOEC or L(E)C50 in st<strong>and</strong>ard soil [mg . kg-1 L(E)C50st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

]<br />

It should be noted that this recommended normalisation is only appropriate when it can be assumed<br />

that the binding behaviour of a non-ionic organic substance in question is predominantly driven by<br />

its logKow, <strong>and</strong> that organisms are exposed predominantly via pore water.<br />

Three situations can be distinguished <strong>for</strong> deriving a PNECsoil:<br />

• when no toxicity data are available <strong>for</strong> soil organisms, the equilibrium partitioning method is<br />

applied to identify a potential risk to soil organisms. This method is regarded as a “screening<br />

approach” <strong>and</strong> is explained in Section 3.6.2.1 (see also Section 3.5.2 sediment);<br />

• when toxicity data are available <strong>for</strong> a producer, a consumer <strong>and</strong>/or a decomposer the<br />

PNECsoil is calculated using assessment factors as presented in Section 3.6.2.2;<br />

• when only one test result with soil dwelling organisms is available the risk assessment is<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med both on the basis of this result using assessment factors <strong>and</strong> on the basis of the<br />

equilibrium partition method. From both PECsoil/PNECsoil ratios the highest one is chosen<br />

<strong>for</strong> the risk characterisation.<br />

(71)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!