05.01.2013 Views

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EFFECTS ASSESSMENT<br />

The weight of the gut contents can be rewritten using the fraction of gut contents in the total worm:<br />

where:<br />

Explanation of symbols<br />

132<br />

W = W ⋅ F ⋅ CONV<br />

(82a)<br />

gut<br />

CONV<br />

earthworm<br />

gut<br />

RHO<br />

soil<br />

soil<br />

soil = (82b)<br />

Fsolid<br />

⋅ RHOsolid<br />

CONVsoil conversion factor <strong>for</strong> soil concentration wet-dry weight soil [kgwwt . kgdwt -1 ]<br />

Fsolid volume fraction of solids in soil [m 3. m -3 ] Table 5<br />

Fgut fraction of gut loading in worm kgdwt . kgwwt -1 0.1<br />

RHOsoil bulk density of wet soil [kgwwt . m -3 ] eq. (18)<br />

RHOsolid density of solid phase [kgdwt . m -3 ] Table 5<br />

Using this equation, the concentration in a full worm can be written as:<br />

C<br />

earthworm<br />

=<br />

BCF<br />

earthworm<br />

⋅C<br />

porewater<br />

1+<br />

F<br />

gut<br />

+ Csoil<br />

⋅ F<br />

⋅CONV<br />

soil<br />

gut<br />

⋅CONV<br />

soil<br />

(82c)<br />

When measured data on bioconcentration in worms is available the BCF factors can be inserted<br />

in the above equation. For most substances, however, these data will not be present <strong>and</strong> BCF will<br />

have to be estimated. For organic chemicals, the main route of uptake into earthworms will be<br />

via the interstitial water. Bioconcentration can be described as a hydrophobic partitioning<br />

between the pore water <strong>and</strong> the phases inside the organism <strong>and</strong> can be modelled according to the<br />

following equation as described by Jager (1998):<br />

earthworm<br />

( 0 . 84 + 0.<br />

K ow ) RHOearthworm<br />

BCF = 012<br />

(82d)<br />

where <strong>for</strong> RHOearthworm by default a value of 1 (kgwwt .L -1 ) can be assumed.<br />

Jager (1998) has demonstrated that this approach per<strong>for</strong>med very well in describing uptake in<br />

experiment with earthworms kept in water. For soil exposure, the scatter is larger <strong>and</strong> the<br />

experimental BCFs are generally somewhat lower than the predictions by the model. The reasons<br />

<strong>for</strong> this discrepancy are unclear but may include experimental difficulties (a lack of equilibrium<br />

or purging method) or an underestimated sorption. 4<br />

4 According to certain studies some soil ingesting organisms may accumulate chemical substances not only from<br />

the soil pore water but also directly (possibly by extraction in the digestive tract) from the fraction of the<br />

substance adsorbed onto soil particles. This may become important <strong>for</strong> strongly adsorbing chemicals, e.g. those<br />

with a logKow > 3. For these compounds the total uptake may be underestimated. In other studies however it<br />

has been shown that soil digesters virtually only bioaccumulate the substance via the pore water, i.e.<br />

bioconcentrate chemical substances from the soil pore water. At present the latter process can be modelled by<br />

use of the equilibrium partitioning theory (cf. also Section 3.5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!