technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...
technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...
technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EFFECTS ASSESSMENT<br />
ecotoxicological tests <strong>for</strong> hazard assessment of chemicals <strong>for</strong> the soil compartment is not<br />
currently available.<br />
Reference can be made to Section 6.3.4 <strong>and</strong> an OECD project in which a testing strategy <strong>for</strong><br />
terrestrial ecosystems is being developed (Léon <strong>and</strong> Van Gestel, 1994). In summary, the<br />
assessment factors proposed in Table 20 must be regarded as indicative. As more in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />
the sensitivity of soil organisms becomes available these factors may have to be revised.<br />
Table 20 Assessment factors <strong>for</strong> derivation of PNECsoil<br />
In<strong>for</strong>mation available Assessment factor<br />
L(E)C50 short-term toxicity test(s) (e.g. plants, earthworms, or microorganisms) 1000<br />
NOEC <strong>for</strong> one long-term toxicity test (e.g. plants) 100<br />
NOEC <strong>for</strong> additional long-term toxicity tests of two trophic levels 50<br />
NOEC <strong>for</strong> additional long-term toxicity tests <strong>for</strong> three species of three trophic levels 10<br />
Species sensitivity distribution (SSD method)<br />
118<br />
5 – 1, to be fully justified on a case-by-case<br />
basis (cf. main text)<br />
Field data/data of model ecosystems case-by-case<br />
A PNECsoil is calculated on the basis of the lowest determined effect concentration. If results<br />
from short-term tests with a producer, a consumer <strong>and</strong>/or a decomposer are available, the result<br />
is divided by a factor of 1000 to calculate the PNECsoil. If only one terrestrial test result is<br />
available (earthworms or plants), the risk assessment should be per<strong>for</strong>med both of this test result<br />
<strong>and</strong> on the basis of the outcome of the aquatic toxicity data to provide an indication of the risk.<br />
As a matter of precaution, the larger PECsoil/PNECsoil ratio determines which further actions<br />
should be taken in the framework of the further testing strategy. If additional soil test results are<br />
available the assessment factors given in Table 20 should be applied.<br />
3.6.2.3 Calculation of PNEC using statistical extrapolation techniques<br />
Calculation of a PNECsoil using statistical extrapolation techniques can be considered when<br />
sufficient data are available (see Section 3.3.1.2. <strong>for</strong> minumum requirements). For comparable<br />
data on the same end-point <strong>and</strong> species, by default the geometric mean should be used as the<br />
input value <strong>for</strong> the calculation of the species sensitivity distribution. When results are available<br />
from tests using different soils <strong>and</strong> it is likely that the soil characteristics have influence on the<br />
results, the effect data should be normalised be<strong>for</strong>e further processing. If not possible, the lowest<br />
NOEC per end-point <strong>and</strong> species should be used. Data on microbial mediated processes <strong>and</strong><br />
single species tests should be considered separately due to fundamental differences between<br />
these tests (functional vs. structural test, multi-species vs. single species, adapted indigenous<br />
microbe community vs. laboratory test species, variability of test design <strong>and</strong> different endpoints,<br />
etc.). The results should be compared <strong>and</strong> evaluated on a case-by-case basis in deciding on a<br />
final PNEC <strong>for</strong> the soil compartment.<br />
The approach of statistical extrapolation is still under debate <strong>and</strong> needs further validation.