05.01.2013 Views

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

technical guidance documents - Institute for Health and Consumer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EFFECTS ASSESSMENT<br />

ecotoxicological tests <strong>for</strong> hazard assessment of chemicals <strong>for</strong> the soil compartment is not<br />

currently available.<br />

Reference can be made to Section 6.3.4 <strong>and</strong> an OECD project in which a testing strategy <strong>for</strong><br />

terrestrial ecosystems is being developed (Léon <strong>and</strong> Van Gestel, 1994). In summary, the<br />

assessment factors proposed in Table 20 must be regarded as indicative. As more in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

the sensitivity of soil organisms becomes available these factors may have to be revised.<br />

Table 20 Assessment factors <strong>for</strong> derivation of PNECsoil<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation available Assessment factor<br />

L(E)C50 short-term toxicity test(s) (e.g. plants, earthworms, or microorganisms) 1000<br />

NOEC <strong>for</strong> one long-term toxicity test (e.g. plants) 100<br />

NOEC <strong>for</strong> additional long-term toxicity tests of two trophic levels 50<br />

NOEC <strong>for</strong> additional long-term toxicity tests <strong>for</strong> three species of three trophic levels 10<br />

Species sensitivity distribution (SSD method)<br />

118<br />

5 – 1, to be fully justified on a case-by-case<br />

basis (cf. main text)<br />

Field data/data of model ecosystems case-by-case<br />

A PNECsoil is calculated on the basis of the lowest determined effect concentration. If results<br />

from short-term tests with a producer, a consumer <strong>and</strong>/or a decomposer are available, the result<br />

is divided by a factor of 1000 to calculate the PNECsoil. If only one terrestrial test result is<br />

available (earthworms or plants), the risk assessment should be per<strong>for</strong>med both of this test result<br />

<strong>and</strong> on the basis of the outcome of the aquatic toxicity data to provide an indication of the risk.<br />

As a matter of precaution, the larger PECsoil/PNECsoil ratio determines which further actions<br />

should be taken in the framework of the further testing strategy. If additional soil test results are<br />

available the assessment factors given in Table 20 should be applied.<br />

3.6.2.3 Calculation of PNEC using statistical extrapolation techniques<br />

Calculation of a PNECsoil using statistical extrapolation techniques can be considered when<br />

sufficient data are available (see Section 3.3.1.2. <strong>for</strong> minumum requirements). For comparable<br />

data on the same end-point <strong>and</strong> species, by default the geometric mean should be used as the<br />

input value <strong>for</strong> the calculation of the species sensitivity distribution. When results are available<br />

from tests using different soils <strong>and</strong> it is likely that the soil characteristics have influence on the<br />

results, the effect data should be normalised be<strong>for</strong>e further processing. If not possible, the lowest<br />

NOEC per end-point <strong>and</strong> species should be used. Data on microbial mediated processes <strong>and</strong><br />

single species tests should be considered separately due to fundamental differences between<br />

these tests (functional vs. structural test, multi-species vs. single species, adapted indigenous<br />

microbe community vs. laboratory test species, variability of test design <strong>and</strong> different endpoints,<br />

etc.). The results should be compared <strong>and</strong> evaluated on a case-by-case basis in deciding on a<br />

final PNEC <strong>for</strong> the soil compartment.<br />

The approach of statistical extrapolation is still under debate <strong>and</strong> needs further validation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!