12.01.2013 Views

Q2 Z2,(Q2) Z2(Q2) - Institute for Water Resources - U.S. Army

Q2 Z2,(Q2) Z2(Q2) - Institute for Water Resources - U.S. Army

Q2 Z2,(Q2) Z2(Q2) - Institute for Water Resources - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

significantly different from the 'normal' discriminators when the differences<br />

between the two discriminators are compared to the standard deviations of<br />

the sub-samples. This comparison is made in Table X.<br />

Variates R.. -<br />

13 13<br />

X 31<br />

X 21<br />

X 32<br />

X 31<br />

X 21<br />

X 32<br />

Table X (1)<br />

50<br />

Actual Probabilities of Correct<br />

Classification<br />

_<br />

1.440 .82 .85 -<br />

.045 .76 - .77<br />

.095 . .56 .81<br />

Standard Deviation<br />

5.39 2.89 -<br />

3.36 - 3.02<br />

. 2.68 2.06<br />

Moreover, the actual probabilities of correct classification are of a<br />

similar order.<br />

Considering the deficienaes of the distribution-free method,<br />

the nature of our in<strong>for</strong>mation, and the apparent robustness of the 'normal'<br />

method, we think that the latter should be adopted.<br />

Let us note that to improve the accuracy of the results, it was<br />

decided not to use the assumption that the variances were equal, even in the<br />

cases where an F-test sustained such a hypothesis. AlthOugh very convenient<br />

in computing the's this hypothesis would decrease the robustness of the<br />

procedure. It is also unwarranted by the nature of the samples.<br />

(1) -<br />

Xij is taken as the mid-value of the intervals given in Table IX.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!