12.01.2013 Views

Q2 Z2,(Q2) Z2(Q2) - Institute for Water Resources - U.S. Army

Q2 Z2,(Q2) Z2(Q2) - Institute for Water Resources - U.S. Army

Q2 Z2,(Q2) Z2(Q2) - Institute for Water Resources - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The five firms in the sample represent major inland waterway<br />

carriers. Taken as a group, their barging operations are highly<br />

d:versified. They operate on all of the navigable tributaries of<br />

the Mississippi and Gulf Intercostal River Systems, including the<br />

Missouri River, the Gulf of Mexico, and Lake . Michigan. In addition,<br />

the five firms offer essentially a complete range of water transport<br />

services, both with respect to commodities handled, and equipment<br />

available <strong>for</strong> freight transportation.<br />

Although the firms in the sample are among the largest firms in<br />

the industry (measured either in current output and revenue, or by<br />

size of equipment stocks), nevertheless, there are considerable dif-<br />

ferences in their absolute size. For example, the largest firm, as<br />

measured by total 'available horsepower, wag on the average 3.3 times<br />

larger' than the smallest iirm'in the sample.<br />

Several surrogate measures could be used to correct <strong>for</strong> firm<br />

size in the statistical model. Since the firm size-cost relationship<br />

carries the interpretation of long-run costs, the measure selected<br />

should be a reflection of the productive capacity of the firm at any<br />

one time. That is, any paired cost-size observation . should represent<br />

the least cost way of operating a firm of particular size. It should<br />

be noted, however, ,that when historical data are used in statistical<br />

cost estimation these theoretical efficiency assumptions are not<br />

necessarily met. The data, in general, do not describe the least<br />

cost solution <strong>for</strong> a particular firm; rather they represent the actual -<br />

cost of operating particular firm sizes included - in the sample.<br />

One could assume that the observations do represent minimum cot<br />

points and interpret the estimated results as the long-run costs of<br />

125<br />

,<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!