25.01.2013 Views

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optical Fluoride and Oxysulfide <strong>Ceramic</strong>s: Preparation and Characterization 87<br />

the matrix element U (2) for all the transitions is equal or close to zero and most contribution to<br />

the l<strong>in</strong>e strengths of the electronic transitions comes from U (6) and to a lesser extent from U (4) .<br />

Hence, only dipole–dipole mechanism of cross-relaxational energy transfer is allowed.<br />

The same situation occurs for the case of energy migration over the 4 F3/2 manifold of the Nd 3+<br />

ion where U (2) for the 4 F3/2→ 4 I9/2 transition is also equal to zero. The dipole–dipole nature of<br />

the above-mentioned processes were confirmed elsewhere [63]. If we use now the<br />

dependence 1n Itr(t) as a function of t 1/2 (Figure 31b), this graph is l<strong>in</strong>earized, which proves<br />

Forster-like decay law and its slope can be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the γ macroparameter (γ=0.03<br />

μs −1/2 ) for 0.5 wt% of the Nd 3+ ion (NA=1.31×10 20 cm −3 ) and s=6. The value of the quench<strong>in</strong>g<br />

microparameter CDA for the 4 F3/2 level determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the slope of the decay curve at the<br />

disordered stage can be calculated us<strong>in</strong>g Eq. (5) and is equal to 3.8×10 −39 cm 6 /s. Similar<br />

analysis of fluorescence decay curves are provided for the La2O2S:Nd 3+ (1 wt%)<br />

(NA=2.03×10 20 cm −3 ) ceramic sample. The measured fluorescence k<strong>in</strong>etics exhibits<br />

nonexponential decay at T=300 K (Figure 32a). Exponential decay at the far stage of the<br />

decay curve gives τf<strong>in</strong>=50.3 μs (1/τmeas.=19881 s −1 ) and po<strong>in</strong>ts out the presence of energy<br />

migration over the donors to acceptors, because the radiative decay time for the La2O2S:Nd 3+<br />

crystal measured <strong>in</strong> Ref. [48] at zero-concentration limit is equal to τR=95 μs. The k<strong>in</strong>etics<br />

decay at the Forster (disordered stage) can be found by multiply<strong>in</strong>g the measured curve by<br />

exp(+t/τf<strong>in</strong>) (Figure 32b), where τf<strong>in</strong> is the measured lifetime at the far stage of k<strong>in</strong>etics decay<br />

and accounts for both <strong>in</strong>tracenter decay and energy migration. The same slope <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of the coord<strong>in</strong>ates [lg(−ln I(t))] and [lgt] was observed (Figure 33a) and, hence, the<br />

dipole–dipole <strong>in</strong>teraction was found for La2O2S: Nd 3+ as well. The γ parameter was obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from the slope of the graph presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 33b and is equal to γ=0.07 μs −1/2 . The<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed value of CDA=2.2×10 −39 cm 6 /s <strong>in</strong> La2O2S: Nd 3+ was found to be 1.8 times smaller<br />

than <strong>in</strong> Gd2O2S:Nd 3+ .<br />

The CDA microparameter <strong>in</strong> oxysulfide ceramics was found to be rather high and to<br />

exceed by two orders of magnitude the quench<strong>in</strong>g microparameter for the 4 F3/2 metastable<br />

level of the Nd 3+ ion <strong>in</strong> the LaF3 crystal (CDA=1.4×10 −41 cm 6 /s at 300 K) [63]. The reason<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Refs. [62] and [64] may be the much higher absorption and emission crosssections<br />

of electronic transitions <strong>in</strong> oxysulfide ceramics compar<strong>in</strong>g to LaF3. The latter<br />

exhibits itself, for example, <strong>in</strong> several times higher radiative rates <strong>in</strong> the ceramics.<br />

The boundary time between the so called ordered stage of the decay and the disordered<br />

one can be calculated from the formula [65]<br />

In the Gd2O2S:Nd 3+ crystal it was found to be 744 ns for Rm<strong>in</strong> (Nd–Nd)=3.76 Å taken<br />

from the data for Nd2O2S crystal [66]. The value of tbound1 is rather small <strong>in</strong> Gd2O2S:Nd 3+<br />

because of large value of CDA and small Rm<strong>in</strong>. The latter is smaller than, for example, <strong>in</strong><br />

LaF3:Nd 3+ (Rm<strong>in</strong>=4.151 Å) [63], and even smaller than <strong>in</strong> SrF2:Nd 3+ (Rm<strong>in</strong>=4.09 Å) [67], <strong>in</strong><br />

CaF2:Nd 3+ (Rm<strong>in</strong>=3.85 Å) [67], and CdF2:Nd 3+ (Rm<strong>in</strong>=3.82 Å) [67]. For La2O2S: Nd 3+ at<br />

T=300 K the boundary time was calculated to be tbound1=1.3 μs which is approximately two<br />

times longer than <strong>in</strong> Gd2O2S:Nd 3+ due to 1.8 times lower value of the CDA microparameter.<br />

(6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!