25.01.2013 Views

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4<br />

Leslie G. Cecil<br />

R<strong>in</strong>gle et al. (1998) believe that the feathered serpent imagery at Mayapán is associated<br />

with the Kokom presence, the Quezalcoatl-Kukulcan cult, and Itza religious identity. The Itza<br />

l<strong>in</strong>eage of the Kokom ruled Mayapán for approximately 100 years, and <strong>in</strong> A.D. 1362/82 a<br />

revolt brought a different Kokom l<strong>in</strong>eage (the rival Itza) <strong>in</strong>to power at Mayapán (Roys<br />

1962:44-46; Tozzer 1941:26). However, problems soon arose for the Kokom as the Xiw<br />

revolted aga<strong>in</strong>st them. Ralph Roys (1962:47) notes that the Kokom l<strong>in</strong>eage ruler at Mayapán<br />

and other followers “fled by sea down the east coast, and went <strong>in</strong>land to Lake Petén” and<br />

settled at Tayasal, which may <strong>in</strong>dicate an earlier migration of the Itza to Petén. Munro<br />

Edmonson (1986:58) also states that a migration occurred after the destruction of Mayapán<br />

and “they went to the heart of the forest—Chak’an Putun, Tan Xuluc Mul by name.” Chak’an<br />

Putun is believed to be located <strong>in</strong> the territory of Chak’an Itza—the northwestern quarter of<br />

Petén Itza territory (Jones 1998; Schele and Mathews 1998:204). As a result of the expulsions<br />

and revolts, Kokom rulership at Mayapán ended, Mayapán was destroyed, and nobles carried<br />

codices to, and built temples <strong>in</strong>, their homelands—the 16 <strong>in</strong>dependent states (Roys 1962:47;<br />

Tozzer 1941:38, 98). In the end, the Kokom rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> eastern Yucatán and the Xiw <strong>in</strong><br />

western Yucatán. Kokom patronyms, such as Balam, Chan, and Tun, were most numerous <strong>in</strong><br />

the sixteenth century prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Sotuta and Mani (Roys 1957:Table 1).<br />

Another l<strong>in</strong>eage at Mayapán was the Kowoj (also Couoh). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Chilam<br />

Balam of Chumayel (Roys 1933:69), these Kowoj were the guardians of the east gate and<br />

may have been related to the Xiw. Their association with the Xiw is strengthened by the<br />

highest frequency of Kowoj l<strong>in</strong>eage names outside of the Petén lakes region occurr<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

Maní, the Xiw capital after the fall of Mayapán (Roys 1957:9, 66). Kowoj, Kab’, Kamal, and<br />

Kawich patronyms were recorded <strong>in</strong> the towns of Tekit, Pencuyut, and Peto <strong>in</strong> the sixteenth<br />

and seventeenth centuries <strong>in</strong> northern Yucatán (Roys 1957:Table 5; also Jones 1998:Table<br />

1.1). In addition to l<strong>in</strong>eage names, Landa (Tozzer 1941:56) and Roys (1957:168) state that the<br />

Kowoj l<strong>in</strong>eage powerfully ruled the prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Champoton <strong>in</strong> the sixteenth century, and that<br />

they recreated architecture similar to that present at Mayapán at towns <strong>in</strong> that region (e.g., Isla<br />

Cilvituk) (Alexander 1998, 2005a, 2005b). In addition to the presence of Kowoj l<strong>in</strong>eage<br />

names <strong>in</strong> northern Yucatán, l<strong>in</strong>eage names have also been documented <strong>in</strong> eastern Yucatán<br />

(Cozumel), Belize (Tipuj), and central Petén (Zacpetén and Topoxté Island) (Jones 1998).<br />

In central Petén, ethnohistorical research has <strong>in</strong>dicated that the Itza and Kowoj (as well as<br />

other sociopolitical groups) occupied territory <strong>in</strong> the region <strong>in</strong> the sixteenth and seventeenth<br />

centuries (Jones 1998:18). Spanish documents and Postclassic to Colonial period (thirteenth<br />

through eighteenth centuries) native histories of these groups (especially the Xiw and the Itza)<br />

record their presence, various alliances <strong>in</strong> Petén, as well as repeated movements to and from<br />

northern Yucatán. The documents suggest that Petén was divided <strong>in</strong>to adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ces headed by and named after a dom<strong>in</strong>ant l<strong>in</strong>eage, each controll<strong>in</strong>g several<br />

subprov<strong>in</strong>ces throughout the area.<br />

The Itza controlled the southern and western bas<strong>in</strong> of Lake Petén Itzá, an area stretch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from Lake Quexil west to Lake Sacpuy, with their capital, Nojpeten (or Taiza), on modern<br />

Flores Island (Figure 1) (Boot 2005; Jones 1998; Jones et al. 1981). The Itza may have been<br />

an alliance of multiple sociopolitical groups (Jones 1998). Their Late Postclassic ruler, Kan<br />

Ek’, claimed ancestry from Chich’en Itza <strong>in</strong> the northern Yucatán pen<strong>in</strong>sula, and he stated<br />

that the Itza migrated from Chich’en Itza when it fell at approximately A.D. 1200 (Edmonson<br />

1986; Jones 1998; Roys 1933). In A.D. 1695, AjChan, Kan Ek’s nephew, also claimed that<br />

his deceased mother was from Chich’en Itza, and “members of the Itza nobility were still

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!