25.01.2013 Views

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

Developments in Ceramic Materials Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Postclassic Maya <strong>Ceramic</strong> Advances 25<br />

Figure 12. Plot of chromium and iron base-10 logged concentrations show<strong>in</strong>g the separation of Snail-<br />

Inclusion Paste ware samples. Labeled samples represent the Trapeche ceramic group and unlabeled<br />

samples represent the Paxcamán and Fulano ceramic groups. Ellipses represent 90% confidence level<br />

for membership <strong>in</strong> the two Trapeche P<strong>in</strong>k compositional groups (Cecil and Neff 2006:Figure 8).<br />

The pa<strong>in</strong>t used for the pa<strong>in</strong>ted decoration on many of the vessels dur<strong>in</strong>g the Postclassic<br />

period is a different value and chroma than that of the slips. This may suggest that Maya<br />

potters are us<strong>in</strong>g different pigments for the pa<strong>in</strong>ted decoration and the slips. Through the LA-<br />

ICP-MS analysis of the red and black pa<strong>in</strong>ted decoration, I was able to suggest that this is<br />

<strong>in</strong>deed the case. The red pa<strong>in</strong>t used for pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g red-on-paste decorations is chemically<br />

different from that used for red-and-black pa<strong>in</strong>ted decoration and the exterior slips.<br />

Additionally, the black pa<strong>in</strong>ts used for black-on-paste decoration and red-and-black<br />

decoration are chemically dist<strong>in</strong>ct (Cecil and Neff 2006:1488-1489). This suggests that the<br />

Maya potters chose different pigments depend<strong>in</strong>g on the decorative programs be<strong>in</strong>g created.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

While the different k<strong>in</strong>ds of analyses presented above provide various categories of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about Postclassic slipped pottery, it is not until all three categories are exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

together with the ethnohistorical record and other archaeological excavation data that the<br />

power of analyz<strong>in</strong>g pottery with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of analytical techniques comes to light. By<br />

conjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these data some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g technological and stylistic comb<strong>in</strong>ations occur<br />

reflect<strong>in</strong>g the choices made by Postclassic potters. These choices <strong>in</strong> turn reflect the potter’s<br />

(and presumably the society <strong>in</strong> which they live) different sociopolitical identities.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the late Term<strong>in</strong>al Classic to Early Postclassic (ca. AD 900-1250) period <strong>in</strong> central<br />

Petén, new types of architecture and pottery <strong>in</strong>dicate that new sociopolitical groups may have<br />

entered <strong>in</strong>to the area. Civic-ceremonial architecture (Pugh 2001a) and C- and L-shaped range

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!