30.01.2013 Views

Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...

Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...

Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Trade</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Employment</strong>: <strong>From</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Facts</strong><br />

ANNEX 6.A: MEASURING ADJUSTMENT IN OUTPUT AND<br />

CHANGES IN INEQUALITY LEVELS<br />

6.A.1 Measuring adjustment in terms of output<br />

The metrics presented in equations (1) <strong>to</strong> (4) in the main text <strong>to</strong> capture adjustment<br />

in labour markets can also be developed <strong>to</strong> capture adjustment in terms of output.<br />

The starting point is again information on sec<strong>to</strong>ral-level output generated, for<br />

example, with CGE simulations. We will refer <strong>to</strong> changes in sec<strong>to</strong>ral output as<br />

where the subscript j represents sec<strong>to</strong>rs. Total change in output resulting from<br />

trade reform in an economy with n sec<strong>to</strong>rs can then be computed using:<br />

250<br />

(Q1)<br />

Where λ j represents the weight of a sec<strong>to</strong>r j in the <strong>to</strong>tal economy. As in the case<br />

of the employment measure in equation (1), the measure is only of limited use <strong>to</strong><br />

reflect the extent of adjustment processes, as positive <strong>and</strong> negative output changes will<br />

cancel out. It is therefore preferable <strong>to</strong> use a variance-based measure of the type:<br />

(Q2)<br />

Taking the square root of provides a useful measure of variation across<br />

sec<strong>to</strong>rs. This measure can be calculated in a rather straightforward way with st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

CGE models.<br />

An important weakness of this measure is that it does not capture output shifts<br />

across firms within the same sec<strong>to</strong>r. For a given change of output within a sec<strong>to</strong>r, Q2<br />

would signal the same extent of adjustment if that change entails proportional shifts<br />

in output across firms or if it entails company failures <strong>and</strong> creation of new companies.<br />

Yet, adjustment of the second type is likely <strong>to</strong> be more costly for an economy, in<br />

particular if growing <strong>and</strong> shrinking firms are located in different regions. The importance<br />

of firm-level adjustments has been emphasized in recent trade literature. A more<br />

appropriate measure would therefore take in<strong>to</strong> account within-sec<strong>to</strong>r adjustment:<br />

where <strong>and</strong> weight of firm i sec<strong>to</strong>r j<br />

,<br />

(Q3)<br />

A measure for <strong>to</strong>tal adjustment, capturing all changes in output, those within<br />

<strong>and</strong> across sec<strong>to</strong>rs, would look as follows:<br />

(Q4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!