14.02.2013 Views

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 15. Neurocomput<strong>in</strong>g, 69:1485-1501, 2006 223<br />

Then the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal components βk of each column of P m were calculated <strong>in</strong><br />

the correspond<strong>in</strong>g feature space Ω (m) . In order to denoise the patterns only<br />

projections onto the first n = 112 pr<strong>in</strong>cipal axes were considered. This lead to<br />

�<br />

βk =<br />

where x is a column of P m .<br />

400<br />

α<br />

i=1<br />

k i k(xi, x), k = 1, . . . , 112 (26)<br />

After reconstruct<strong>in</strong>g the image ˆ PnΦ(x) of the sample vector under the map Φ<br />

(equation 18), its approximate pre-image was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

cost function<br />

�112<br />

�400<br />

ρ(z) = −2<br />

βk α<br />

k=1 i=1<br />

k i k(xi, z) (27)<br />

Note that the method described above fails to denoise the region where the<br />

water resonance appears (data po<strong>in</strong>ts 1001 to 1101) because then the samples<br />

formed from the orig<strong>in</strong>al data differ too much from the noisy data. This is not<br />

a major drawback as prote<strong>in</strong> peaks totally hidden under the water artifact<br />

cannot be uncovered by the presented bl<strong>in</strong>d source separation method. Figure<br />

9(c) shows the result<strong>in</strong>g denoised prote<strong>in</strong> spectrum on an identical vertical<br />

scale as figure 9(a) and figure 9(b). The <strong>in</strong>sert compares the noise <strong>in</strong> a region<br />

of the spectrum between 10 and 9ppm roughly where no prote<strong>in</strong> peaks are<br />

found. The upper trace shows the basel<strong>in</strong>e of the denoised reconstructed prote<strong>in</strong><br />

spectrum and the lower trace the correspond<strong>in</strong>g basel<strong>in</strong>e of the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

experimental spectrum before the water artifact has been separated out.<br />

4.3.3 Denois<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g Delayed AMUSE<br />

LICA denois<strong>in</strong>g of reconstructed prote<strong>in</strong> spectra necessitate the solution of the<br />

BSS problem beforehand us<strong>in</strong>g any ICA algorithm. A much more elegant solution<br />

is provided by the recently proposed algorithm dAMUSE, which achieves<br />

BSS and denois<strong>in</strong>g simultaneously. To test the performance of the algorithm,<br />

it was also applied to the 2D NOESY NMR spectra of the polypeptide P11.<br />

A 1D slice of the 2D NOESY spectrum of P11 correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the shortest<br />

evolution period t1 is presented <strong>in</strong> figure 9(a) which shows a huge water artifact<br />

despite some pre-saturation on the water resonance. Figure 10 shows the reconstructed<br />

spectra obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the algorithms GEVD-MP and dAMUSE,<br />

respectively. The algorithm GEVD-MP yielded almost artifact-free spectra<br />

but with clear changes <strong>in</strong> the peak <strong>in</strong>tensities <strong>in</strong> some areas of the spectra. On<br />

the contrary, the reconstructed spectra obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the algorithm dAMUSE<br />

still conta<strong>in</strong> some remnants of the water artifact but the prote<strong>in</strong> peak <strong>in</strong>tensities<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed unchanged and all basel<strong>in</strong>e distortions have been cured. All<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!