14.02.2013 Views

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 Chapter 2. Neural Computation 16:1827-1850, 2004<br />

A New Concept for Separability Problems <strong>in</strong> BSS 1835<br />

Corollary 1. Let X be a random variable with twice cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable<br />

density pX satisfy<strong>in</strong>g equation 3.3. Then X is gaussian.<br />

If we do not want to assume that the random variable has a density, we<br />

can use its characteristic function (Bauer, 1996) <strong>in</strong>stead to show an equivalent<br />

result:<br />

Corollary 2. Let X be a random variable with twice cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable<br />

characteristic function �X(x) := EX(exp ixX) satisfy<strong>in</strong>g equation 3.3. Then X is<br />

gaussian or determ<strong>in</strong>istic.<br />

Proof. Us<strong>in</strong>g �X(0) = 1, lemma 3 shows that �X(x) = exp( a<br />

2 x2 + bx). Moreover,<br />

from �X(−x) = �X(x), we get a ∈ R and b = ib ′ with real b ′ . And |�X| ≤1<br />

shows that a ≤ 0. So if a = 0, then X is determ<strong>in</strong>istic (at b ′ ), and if a �= 0,<br />

then X has a gaussian distribution with mean b ′ and variance −a −1 .<br />

3.3 Proof of Theorem 2. We will now prove l<strong>in</strong>ear separability; for this,<br />

we will use separatedness to show that some source components have to be<br />

gaussian (us<strong>in</strong>g the results from above) if the mix<strong>in</strong>g matrix is not trivial.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> argument is given <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g lemma:<br />

Lemma 4. Let gi ∈ C 2 (R, C) and B ∈ Gl(n) such that f (x) := g1⊗···⊗gn(Bx)<br />

is separated. Then for all <strong>in</strong>dices l and i �= j with bliblj �= 0,gl satisfies the differential<br />

equation 3.3 with some constant a.<br />

Proof. f is separated, so by theorem 1i.<br />

Rij[ f ] ≡ f ∂i∂j f − (∂i f )(∂j f ) ≡ 0 (3.4)<br />

holds for i < j. The <strong>in</strong>gredients of this equation can be calculated for i < j<br />

as follows:<br />

∂i f (x) = �<br />

bkig1 ⊗···⊗g ′ k ⊗···⊗gn(Bx)<br />

k<br />

(∂i f )(∂j f )(x) = �<br />

bkiblj(g1 ⊗···⊗g ′ k ⊗···⊗gn)<br />

k,l<br />

× (g1 ⊗···⊗g ′ l ⊗···⊗gn)(Bx)<br />

∂i∂j f (x) = �<br />

bki(bkjg1 ⊗···⊗g ′′<br />

k ⊗···⊗gn<br />

k<br />

+ �<br />

bljg1 ⊗···⊗g ′ k ⊗···⊗g′ l ⊗···⊗gn)(Bx).<br />

l�=k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!