14.02.2013 Views

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 16. Proc. ICA 2006, pages 917-925 231<br />

An <strong>in</strong>tuitive notion of how to choose the reduced dimension n is to require that WGX is<br />

maximally Gaussian, and hence WNX non-Gaussian.<br />

The dimension reduction problem itself can of course also be formulated with<strong>in</strong> a<br />

generative model, which leads to the follow<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ear mix<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

X=ANSN+ AGSG<br />

such that SN and SG are <strong>in</strong>dependent, and SG Gaussian. Then (AN, AG) −1 = (W ⊤ N , W⊤ G )⊤ .<br />

This model <strong>in</strong>cludes the general noisy ICA model X=ANSN+ G, where G is Gaussian<br />

and SN is also assumed to be mutually <strong>in</strong>dependent; the dimension reduction then means<br />

projection onto the signal subspace, which might be deteriorated by the noise G along<br />

the subspace — the components of G orthogonal to the subspace will be removed.<br />

However (1) is more general <strong>in</strong> the sense that it does not assume mutual <strong>in</strong>dependence<br />

of SN, only <strong>in</strong>dependence of SN and SG.<br />

The paper is organized as follows: In the next section, we first discuss obvious<br />

<strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>acies of NGSA and possible regularizations. We then present our ma<strong>in</strong> result,<br />

theorem 1, and give an explicit proof <strong>in</strong> a special case. The general proof is divided<br />

up <strong>in</strong>to a series of lemmas, the proofs of which are omitted due to lack of space. In<br />

section 2, some simulations are performed to validate the uniqueness result. A practical<br />

algorithm for perform<strong>in</strong>g NGSA essentially us<strong>in</strong>g the idea of separated characteristic<br />

functions from the proof is presented <strong>in</strong> the co-paper [6].<br />

1 Uniqueness of NGSA-based dimension reduction<br />

This contribution aims at provid<strong>in</strong>g conditions such that the decomposition (1) is unique.<br />

More precisely, we will show under which conditions the non-Gaussian as well as the<br />

Gaussian subspace is unique.<br />

1.1 Indeterm<strong>in</strong>acies<br />

Clearly, the matrices AN and AG <strong>in</strong> the decomposition (1) cannot be unique — multiplication<br />

from the right us<strong>in</strong>g any <strong>in</strong>vertible matrix leaves the model <strong>in</strong>variant: X=<br />

ANSN+ AGSG= (ANBN)(B−1 −1<br />

N SN)+(AGBG)(B G SG) with BN∈ Gl(n), BG∈ Gl(d− n),<br />

because B−1 N SN and B−1 G SG are aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent, and B−1 G SG Gaussian.<br />

An additional <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>acy comes <strong>in</strong>to play due to the fact that we do not want to<br />

fix the reduced dimension <strong>in</strong> advance. Given a realization of the model (1) with d

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!