14.02.2013 Views

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 Chapter 2. Neural Computation 16:1827-1850, 2004<br />

A New Concept for Separability Problems <strong>in</strong> BSS 1837<br />

and T, D −1<br />

1 AD2 and Y satisfy the assumption, and D −1<br />

1 AD2 is orthogonal<br />

because<br />

I = Cov(Y)<br />

= E(YY ⊤ )<br />

= E(D −1<br />

1 AD2TT ⊤ D2A ⊤ D −1<br />

1 )<br />

= (D −1 −1<br />

1 AD2)(D1 AD2) ⊤ .<br />

So without loss of generality, let A be orthogonal.<br />

Now let � S(s) := ES(exp is ⊤ S) be the characteristic function of S. Byassumption,<br />

the covariance (and hence the mean) of S exists, so � S ∈ C 2 (R n , C)<br />

(Bauer, 1996). Furthermore, s<strong>in</strong>ce S is assumed to be <strong>in</strong>dependent, its characteristic<br />

function is separated: � S ≡ g1 ⊗···⊗gn, where gi ≡ � Si. The characteristic<br />

function of AS can easily be calculated as<br />

�AS(x) = ES(exp ix ⊤ AS) = � S(A ⊤ x) = g1 ⊗···⊗gn(A ⊤ x)<br />

for x ∈ R n . Let B := (bij) = A ⊤ . S<strong>in</strong>ce AS is also assumed to be <strong>in</strong>dependent,<br />

f (x) := � AS(x) = g1 ⊗···⊗gn(Bx) is separated.<br />

Now assume that A �∼ I. Us<strong>in</strong>g orthogonality of B = A ⊤ , there exist<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices k �= l and i �= j with bkibkj �= 0 and bliblj �= 0. Then accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to lemma 4, gk and gl satisfy the differential equation 3.3. Together with<br />

corollary 2, this shows that both Sk and Sl are gaussian, which is a contradiction<br />

to the assumption.<br />

ii. Let S be an n-dimensional <strong>in</strong>dependent random vector with density<br />

pS ∈ C 2 (R n , R) and no gaussian component, and let A ∈ Gl(n). S is assumed<br />

to be <strong>in</strong>dependent, so its density factorizes pS ≡ g1 ⊗···⊗gn. The density<br />

of AS is given by<br />

pAS(x) =|det A| −1 pS(A −1 x) =|det A| −1 g1 ⊗···⊗gn(Ax)<br />

for x ∈ R n . Let B := (bij) = A −1 . AS is also assumed to be <strong>in</strong>dependent, so<br />

f (x) := |det A|pAS(x) = g1 ⊗···⊗gn(Bx)<br />

is separated.<br />

Assume A �∼ I. Then also B = A −1 �∼ I, so there exist <strong>in</strong>dices l and<br />

i �= j with bliblj �= 0. Hence, it follows from lemma 4 that gl satisfies the<br />

differential equation 3.3. But gl is a density, so accord<strong>in</strong>g to corollary 1 the<br />

lth component of S is gaussian, which is a contradiction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!