14.02.2013 Views

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62 Chapter 2. Neural Computation 16:1827-1850, 2004<br />

A New Concept for Separability Problems <strong>in</strong> BSS 1833<br />

ii. S has no gaussian component, and its density pS exists and is twice cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />

differentiable.<br />

Then if AS is aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent, A is equivalent to the identity.<br />

So A is the product of a scal<strong>in</strong>g and a permutation matrix. The important<br />

part of this theorem is assumption i, which has been used to show separability<br />

by Comon (1994) and extended by Eriksson and Koivunen (2003) based<br />

on the Darmois-Skitovitch theorem (Darmois, 1953; Skitovitch, 1953). Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this theorem, the second part can be easily shown without C 2 -densities.<br />

Theorem 2 <strong>in</strong>deed proves separability of the l<strong>in</strong>ear BSS model, because<br />

if X = AS and W is a demix<strong>in</strong>g matrix such that WX is <strong>in</strong>dependent, then<br />

WA ∼ I,soW −1 ∼ A as desired.<br />

We will give a much easier proof without hav<strong>in</strong>g to use the Darmois-<br />

Skitovitch theorem <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sections.<br />

3.1 Two-Dimensional Positive Density Case. For illustrative purposes<br />

we will first prove separability for a two-dimensional random vector S with<br />

positive density pS ∈ C 2 (R 2 , R). Let A ∈ Gl(2). It is enough to show that if<br />

S and AS are <strong>in</strong>dependent, then either A ∼ I or S is gaussian.<br />

S is assumed to be <strong>in</strong>dependent, so its density factorizes:<br />

pS(s) = g1(s1)g2(s2),<br />

for s ∈ R 2 . First, note that the density of AS is given by<br />

pAS(x) =|det A| −1 pS(A −1 x) = cg1(b11x1 + b12x2)g2(b21x1 + b22x2)<br />

for x ∈ R 2 , c �= 0 fixed. Here, B = (bij) = A −1 . AS is also assumed to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent, so pAS(x) is separated.<br />

pS was assumed to be positive; then so is pAS. Hence, ln pAS(x) is l<strong>in</strong>early<br />

separated, so<br />

∂1∂2 ln pAS(x) = b11b12h ′′<br />

1 (b11x1 + b12x2) + b21b22h ′′<br />

2 (b21x1 + b22x2) = 0<br />

for all x ∈ R 2 , where hi := ln gi ∈ C 2 (R 2 , R). By sett<strong>in</strong>g y := Bx, we therefore<br />

have<br />

b11b12h ′′<br />

1 (y1) + b21b22h ′′<br />

2 (y2) = 0 (3.2)<br />

for all y ∈ R 2 , because B is <strong>in</strong>vertible.<br />

Now, if A (and therefore also B) is equivalent to the identity, then equation<br />

3.2 holds. If not, then A, and hence also B, have at least three nonzero<br />

entries. By equation 3.2 the fourth entry has to be nonzero, because the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!