Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis
Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis
Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
304 BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />
Schießl, I., Schöner, H., Stetter, M., Dima, A., and Obermayer, K. (2000). Regularized second<br />
order source separation. In Proc. ICA 2000, volume 2, pages 111–116, Hels<strong>in</strong>ki, F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />
Schölkopf, B. and Smola, A. (2002). Learn<strong>in</strong>g with Kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., and Müller, K. (1998). Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear component analysis as a kernel<br />
eigenvalue nonl<strong>in</strong>ear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation,<br />
10:1299–1319.<br />
Schöner, H., Stetter, M., Schießl, I., Mayhew, J., Lund, J., McLoughl<strong>in</strong>, N., and Obermayer, K.<br />
(2000). Application of bl<strong>in</strong>d separation of sources to optical record<strong>in</strong>g of bra<strong>in</strong> activity. In<br />
Proc. NIPS 1999, volume 12, pages 949–955. MIT Press.<br />
Skitovitch, V. (1953). On a property of the normal distribution. DAN SSSR, 89:217–219.<br />
Skitovitch, V. (1954). L<strong>in</strong>ear forms <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent random variables and the normal distribution<br />
law. Izvestiia AN SSSR, Ser. Matem., 18:185–200.<br />
Specht, K. and Reul, J. (2003). Function segregation of the temporal lobes <strong>in</strong>to highly differentiated<br />
subsystems for auditory perception: an auditory rapid event-related fmri-task.<br />
NeuroImage, 20:1944–1954.<br />
Squart<strong>in</strong>i, S. and Theis, F. (2006). New riemannian metrics for speed<strong>in</strong>g-up the convergence of<br />
over- and underdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed ICA. In Proc. ISCAS 2006, Kos, Greece.<br />
Stadlthanner, K., Theis, F., Lang, E., and Puntonet, C. (2005a). Hybridiz<strong>in</strong>g sparse component<br />
analysis with genetic algorithms for bl<strong>in</strong>d source separation. In Proc. ISBMDA 2005, pages<br />
137–148, Aveiro, Portugal.<br />
Stadlthanner, K., Theis, F., Lang, E., Puntonet, C., Gomez-Vilda, P., Tomé, A., Langmann,<br />
T., and Schmitz, G. (2006a). Sparse nonnegative matrix factorization applied to microarray<br />
data sets. In Proc. ICA 2006, pages 254–261, Charleston, USA.<br />
Stadlthanner, K., Theis, F., Lang, E., Tomé, A., Gronwald, W., and Kalbitzer, H.-R. (2003). A<br />
matrix pencil approach to the bl<strong>in</strong>d source separation of artifacts <strong>in</strong> 2D NMR spectra. Neural<br />
Information Process<strong>in</strong>g LR, 1(3):103–110.<br />
Stadlthanner, K., Theis, F., Puntonet, C., and Lang, E. (2005b). Extended sparse nonnegative<br />
matrix factorization. In Proc. IWANN 2005, volume 3512 of LNCS, pages 249–256, Barcelona,<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong>. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger.<br />
Stadlthanner, K., Tomé, A., Theis, F., Lang, E., Gronwald, W., and Kalbitzer, H. (2006b).<br />
Separation of water artifacts <strong>in</strong> 2D NOESY prote<strong>in</strong> spectra us<strong>in</strong>g congruent matrix pencils.<br />
Neurocomput<strong>in</strong>g, 69:497–522.<br />
Stone, J., Porrill, J., Porter, N., and Wilk<strong>in</strong>son, I. (2002). Spatiotemporal <strong>in</strong>dependent component<br />
analysis of event-related fmri data us<strong>in</strong>g skewed probability density functions. NeuroImage,<br />
15(2):407–421.