14.02.2013 Views

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

Mathematics in Independent Component Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

226 Chapter 15. Neurocomput<strong>in</strong>g, 69:1485-1501, 2006<br />

[3] P. Comon. Idependent component analysis - a new concept ? Signal Process<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

36:287–314, 1994.<br />

[4] K. I. Diamantaras and S. Y. Kung. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>Component</strong> Neural Networks,<br />

Theory and Applications. Wiley, 1996.<br />

[5] A. Effern, K. Lehnertz, T. Schreiber, T. Grunwald, P. David, and C. E.<br />

Elger. Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear denois<strong>in</strong>g of transient signals with application to event-related<br />

potentials. Physica D, 140:257–266, 2000.<br />

[6] E. Fishler and H. Messer. On the use of order statistics for improved detection<br />

of signals by the MDL criterion. IEEE Transactions on Signal Process<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

48:2242–2247, 2000.<br />

[7] R. Freeman. Sp<strong>in</strong> Choreography. Spektrum Academic Publishers, Oxford, 1997.<br />

[8] R. R. Gharieb and A. Cichocki. Second-order statistics based bl<strong>in</strong>d source<br />

separation us<strong>in</strong>g a bank of subband filters. Digital Signal Process<strong>in</strong>g, 13:252–<br />

274, 2003.<br />

[9] M. Ghil, M. R. Allen, M. D. Dett<strong>in</strong>ger, and K. Ide. Advanced spectral methods<br />

for climatic time series. Reviews of Geophysics, 40(1):1–41, 2002.<br />

[10] K. H. Hausser and H.-R. Kalbitzer. NMR <strong>in</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e and Biology. Berl<strong>in</strong>,<br />

1991.<br />

[11] J. Hérault and C. Jutten. Space or time adaptive signal process<strong>in</strong>g by neural<br />

network models. In J. S. Denker, editor, Neural Networks for Comput<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the AIP Conference, pages 206–211, New York, 1986. American<br />

Institute of Physics.<br />

[12] Aapo Hyvär<strong>in</strong>en, Patrik Hoyer, and Erkki Oja. Intelligent Signal Process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

IEEE Press, 2001.<br />

[13] A. Hyvär<strong>in</strong>en, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja. <strong>Independent</strong> <strong>Component</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong>.<br />

2001.<br />

[14] A. Hyvär<strong>in</strong>en and E. Oja. A fast fixed-po<strong>in</strong>t algorithm for <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

component analysis. Neural Computation, 9:1483–1492, 1997.<br />

[15] A. K. Ja<strong>in</strong> and R. C. Dubes. Algorithms for Cluster<strong>in</strong>g Data. Prentice Hall:<br />

New Jersey, 1988.<br />

[16] J. T. Kwok and I. W. Tsang. The pre-image problem <strong>in</strong> kernel methods. In<br />

Proceed. Int. Conf. Mach<strong>in</strong>e Learn<strong>in</strong>g (ICML03), 2003.<br />

[17] A. P. Liavas and P. A. Regalia. On the behavior of <strong>in</strong>formation theoretic criteria<br />

for model order selection. IEEE Transactions on Signal Process<strong>in</strong>g, 49:1689–<br />

1695, 2001.<br />

[18] Chor T<strong>in</strong> Ma, Zhi D<strong>in</strong>g, and Sze Fong Yau. A two-stage algorithm for MIMO<br />

bl<strong>in</strong>d deconvolution of nonstationary colored noise. IEEE Transactions on<br />

Signal Process<strong>in</strong>g, 48:1187–1192, 2000.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!