02.04.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34<br />

favour of the Dihong,<br />

EAST ASIA.<br />

since Wilcox and Burlton ascertained in 1825-6 that it is<br />

evidently the main branch of the Brahmaputra. But when they<br />

went on to<br />

assert that the Brahmaputra itself is the lower course of the Tsangbo, the .<br />

unexplored gap between the two rivers was no less than 300 miles long as the bird<br />

flies, and the intervening highlands were entirely unknown. The information<br />

brought back by Wilcox regarding the river ascended by him was also far from<br />

sufficient to his<br />

justify opinion on the identity of the two streams. He should<br />

have first of all proved that the Dihong has a larger volume than the Tsangbo.<br />

Fig.<br />

According<br />

14. COURSE OF THE TSANOBO.<br />

to Markham. Scale 1 : 10,000,000.<br />

300 Miles.<br />

But he merely observed that at the point reached by him the Dihong was 100<br />

yards broad, with a slow current, and, as fie supposed, an immense depth.<br />

The is problem now confined to the narrowest limits. According to Walker's<br />

explorations, the entirely unexplored space separating the extreme point reached by<br />

the already mentioned Hindu pundit on the Tsangbo, and the farthest point to<br />

which the Dihong has been ascended, is exactly 93 miles, and the difference of level<br />

would appear to be about 7,500 feet, Were the two streams connected, the total<br />

fall in an approximate course of 180 miles would consequently be rather over<br />

1 in 100 yards a fall unapproached by any other river in its middle course, and<br />

equalled only by the valleys of torrents in the heart of the mountains. Vague

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!