09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

April 6 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> procedures solely from the viewpoint of safety.” (CRY 4/6/67,<br />

H3657 ; NASA LAR VI/39)<br />

* Col. V. John Lyle (USAF, Ret.), former Assistant to the Comptroller of<br />

the Air Force, was made special assistant to NASA Associate Administra-<br />

tor for Manned Space Flight Dr. George E. Mueller. (NASA Ann)<br />

* Reduced television <strong>and</strong> telephone rates between US. <strong>and</strong> Europe became<br />

effective when Zntelsat ZZ-C comsat entered commercial service. New<br />

rates, which covered only the leasing of channels to authorized com-<br />

munications common carriers operating in the Atlantic, applied to both<br />

Early Bird Z <strong>and</strong> Intelsat ZZ-C. Monthly charge for one leased voice<br />

channel was reduced from $4,200 for 16-hr daily service to $3,800 for<br />

24-hr service. Rates for one-way black-<strong>and</strong>-white television in the Atlan-<br />

tic area were $1,100 for first 10 min <strong>and</strong> $30 for each additional minute<br />

per half channel. New rates for color TV reduced existing 150% of<br />

black-<strong>and</strong>-white charge to 125% of black-<strong>and</strong>-white rate. All rates were<br />

based on providing voice-grade or TV half-channel service from a US.<br />

earth station to an appropriate satellite <strong>and</strong> did not cover charges for<br />

communication links from satellite to an overseas earth station. (Com-<br />

SatCorp Release)<br />

* Trans World Airlines retired the last of its propeller-driven Constellations<br />

<strong>and</strong> became first major US. airline to have an all-jet fleet on domestic as<br />

well as overseas routes. (NYT, 4/7/67,62)<br />

* Editorial comment on domestic satellite system controversy [see April 1,3].<br />

New York Times: “The Ford Foundation <strong>and</strong> Communications Satel-<br />

lite Corporation are at odds about how best to set up a domestic satellite<br />

system that would carry educational television. Neither side, it appears,<br />

has all the answers. Ford is right to question Comsat’s dem<strong>and</strong> to run<br />

a domestic satellite system . . . [but] Ford’s own plan for creating<br />

a new educational network is also unsatisfactory. It wants to give the<br />

job on a trial basis to the National <strong>Aeronautics</strong> <strong>and</strong> Space Adminis-<br />

tration, which has enough problems with its present over-ambitious<br />

objectives <strong>and</strong> should not have its energies diverted or its resources<br />

increased for anything new. Ford’s suggestion that savings in com-<br />

munications charges made by the commercial networks should be used<br />

to finance educational TV has an inherent disadvantage in that the<br />

amount of savings would be inadequate to do a worthwhile job. . . .<br />

These differences in approach should not be allowed to hold up develop-<br />

ment of noncommercial network. The thing to do is to choose what is<br />

best from both plans.” (NYT, 4/6/67,36)<br />

Washington Post: “The issue is more than just a squabble over<br />

Comsat’s request. The Ford Foundation has proposed that the Nation<br />

establish more than one domestic satellite system, with one system<br />

reserved exclusively for television, both commercial <strong>and</strong> public. Comsat<br />

maintains that one system can do the entire job of communications<br />

adequately <strong>and</strong> will save large sums of money. . . . Given the com-<br />

plexities of the problem, <strong>and</strong> the need that it be solved, h<strong>and</strong>-in-h<strong>and</strong><br />

with the general question of how public television is to be financed,<br />

we think Ford’s alternative is advisable. . . . NASA has the capabilities<br />

to do the job <strong>and</strong> would be involved, anyway, in putting Comsat’s satel-<br />

lite into orbit. This solution would leave all avenues open, for NASA<br />

is highly unlikely to become the permanent operator <strong>and</strong> could recoup<br />

its expenditures by selling the equipment <strong>and</strong> stations to the eventual<br />

operator.” (V Post, 4/6/67)<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!