09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

November 20 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong><br />

nual NASA issue, <strong>and</strong> it entered “a new era, a stirring period of explora-<br />

tion <strong>and</strong> adventure comparable to the Age of Discovery in the 14th <strong>and</strong><br />

15th Centuries.” Benefits from our mastery of space, he said, “are open-<br />

ing to us <strong>and</strong> others new sources of national power <strong>and</strong> new arenas in<br />

which to seek international cooperation as important to our future <strong>and</strong><br />

the future of the world as sea power <strong>and</strong> air power have been in the past.”<br />

He challenged: “Unless we are prepared to move ahead with new pro-<br />

grams of [planetary exploration, <strong>and</strong> work with useful machines <strong>and</strong><br />

systems in earth orbit] . . . we will be backing out of the Space Age<br />

almost before we enter it.” (Webb, Aero Tech, 11/20/67, 244)<br />

* Karl Ham, president of Ae~ospace Industries Assn., spoke before Metro-<br />

politan Baltimore Chamber of Commerce on impact of US. space effort<br />

<strong>and</strong> risk that it would be weighed <strong>and</strong> evaluated in “oversimplified<br />

terms.” A huge <strong>and</strong> complex effort should not be judged by superficial<br />

aspects alone, forgetting that concentration of “our best industrial, eco-<br />

nomic, scientific <strong>and</strong> intellectual resources, organized to an unprece-<br />

dented degree . . ., has an impact on every aspect of our national life.”<br />

Harr noted the strangeness of the unknown medium of space, “for<br />

which our ultimate capabilities are yet to be determined.” “Today we<br />

find ourselves both in midstream in our national space effort <strong>and</strong> at a<br />

crossroads as to future efforts. . . . It is essential that we delay no<br />

longer in sorting out that which is valid <strong>and</strong> enduring, in terms of your<br />

total interest <strong>and</strong> mine, from that which is superficial or transitory.”<br />

(Text)<br />

November 20-21 : Since X-15 No. 3 crash Nov. 15, research missions in<br />

X-15 No. 1 <strong>and</strong> No. 2 had been suspended by FRC until review of flight<br />

operating procedures was completed. X-15 No. 1 was awaiting captive<br />

flight checkout under wing of B-52 carrier plane. X-15 No. 2 was under<br />

repair at North American Rockwell plant following damage to lower<br />

stub fin on its tail, but was expected to be flying by February 1968.<br />

Cause of X-15 No. 3 crash was unknown. The pilot, Maj. Michael J.<br />

Adams, had difficulty with control booster system; X-15 failed to recover<br />

from a dive from extremely high altitude, the pilot losing control above<br />

200,000 ft <strong>and</strong> regaining it briefly at about 80,000 ft.<br />

Setting unofficial world speed <strong>and</strong> altitude records, the three X-15s<br />

had flown 191 times; No. 3 having had 65 flights. The aircraft were built<br />

by North American Rockwell (formerly NAA) under a cooperative pro-<br />

gram by WAF, USN, <strong>and</strong> NASA. ( NASA Proj Off)<br />

November 21: U.S.S.R. launched Cosmos CXCI into orbit with 518-km<br />

(322-mi) apogee, 281-km (174-mi) perigee, 92.2-min. period, <strong>and</strong> 71’<br />

inclination. Equipment <strong>and</strong> instruments functioned satisfactorily.<br />

(Aero Tech, 12/4/67,17)<br />

NASA Fy’ 1!X8 operating plan was presented by Administrator James E.<br />

Webb to House Committee on Science <strong>and</strong> <strong>Astronautics</strong>, reflecting<br />

accommodation of fund reductions by Congress during recent months-<br />

20% for R&D programs other than Apollo, 50% €or construction of<br />

facilities, <strong>and</strong> 7 % for administrative operations. He reviewed decisions<br />

restructuring NASA effort at least through FY 1969.<br />

The first scheduled Apoll~ Applications flights of 1970-a “limited<br />

number with limited objectives”-would begin with a “precursor<br />

training mission for scientists-astronauts with certain orbital experi-<br />

ments, <strong>and</strong> then proceed with dual launch missions with the Orbital<br />

Workshop <strong>and</strong> the Apollo Telescope Mount.” Launch vehicle/spacecraft<br />

352

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!