09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong> September 6<br />

rocket flights, measurements were made simultaneously with those of<br />

Ohservatory’s giant radar-radio telescope, 30 mi<br />

port launch site. World’s largest radar-radio telescope<br />

took ionospheric readings, using its 1,000-ft-dia wire mesh reflector.<br />

(NASA Proj Off; NASA Release 67-230; WS Release 67-28)<br />

* Army contract awards to the Western Electric Company, totaling $231.4<br />

million, for Nike-X work had been announced. Specific totals <strong>and</strong> contract<br />

purposes: $215.2 million for continued R&D; $13.2 million for<br />

deployment planning activities; <strong>and</strong> $3.0 million for support facilities.<br />

(DOD Release 837-67)<br />

3eptember 7: Reorganization of the Bureau of the Budget had created the<br />

Economic, Science <strong>and</strong> Technology Division, headed by John D. Young,<br />

reported Jerry Kluttz, in Washington Post. Young, at one time NASA’s<br />

Assistant Administrator for Administration, had headed the task force<br />

that recommended the shakeup. Reporting to his new division would be<br />

the Departments of Commerce <strong>and</strong> Transportation, AEC, NASA, NSF,<br />

Small Business Administration, <strong>and</strong> the regulatory agencies. Both NASA<br />

<strong>and</strong> AEC were transferred from the Military Division. (Kluttz, W Post,<br />

9/7/67)<br />

Navy contract award had been made to Radio Corporation of America<br />

in letter contract for $2.0 million, for six navigation satellites. The Special<br />

Projects <strong>Office</strong>, USN would be contracting activity. (DOD Release<br />

846-67)<br />

September 7-9: NASA’s Biosatellite II (Biosatellite-B) was successfully<br />

launched from ETR by a two-stage Thrust-Augmented Improved Delta<br />

launch vehicle into orbit with 202-mi (326-km) apogee, 187-mi (302km)<br />

perigee, 90.8-min period, <strong>and</strong> 33.5” inclination. The 940-lb research<br />

spacecraft consisted of three main sections : an adapter section which<br />

would remain in orbit; the reentry vehicle carrying the retrorocket <strong>and</strong><br />

heat shield for reentry into the earth’s atmosphere; <strong>and</strong>, within the reentry<br />

vehicle, the experiment capsule containing the scientific experiments,<br />

life support equipment, parachutes, <strong>and</strong> radio beacon to aid in<br />

recovery. Biosatellite II carried 13 experiments to determine effects of<br />

the space environment on various life processes.<br />

Performance of the spacecraft was satisfactory except for some difficulty<br />

with completely reliable response to comm<strong>and</strong> transmission from<br />

the ground stations <strong>and</strong> out-of-spec accelerations during the first few<br />

orbits. The spacecraft’s temperature, attitude control, <strong>and</strong> atmospheric<br />

pressure readings were normal, <strong>and</strong> few additional anomalies were experienced.<br />

Mid-air recovery of NASA’s Biosatellite II experiment capsule,<br />

by aircraft at 3:15 pm EDT Sept. 9, within 15 mi of predicted impact<br />

location of 7’15’N <strong>and</strong> 162Oi’W, marked a new first. Biosatellite I,<br />

which had remained in orbit for two months after the retrorocket failed,<br />

l<strong>and</strong>ed in the ocean near Australia following reentry Feb. 15, but was not<br />

recovered.<br />

The most important single question for Biosatellite II wils whether<br />

the changes produced in organisms by radiation are slowed or hastened<br />

under weightless conditions. Biosatellite scientists had noted that early<br />

recovery had resulted in less risk to the experiments than if recovery<br />

had been delayed beyond the planned three days. Despite the delayed<br />

launch <strong>and</strong> early recovery, scientists reported only a small decrease in the<br />

expected data return from the experiments. Indications were that all<br />

programmed events in orbit, such as fixation of frog eggs, fixation <strong>and</strong><br />

324-801 0-69-18 263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!