09.04.2013 Views

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1967 - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, <strong>1967</strong> November 24<br />

comm<strong>and</strong>s to maneuver spacecraft. Used to teach deaf <strong>and</strong> retarded<br />

people, machine helped deaf person to correct his speech by “seeing” his<br />

voice, <strong>and</strong> NASA scientists would use this project <strong>and</strong> similar studies to<br />

categorize <strong>and</strong> encode speech patterns. ( ERC Release 67-39)<br />

November 25: Spectrometer aboard NASA’s Os0 IV, launched Oct. 18, had<br />

obtained spectral data providing complete picture of corona over whole<br />

face of solar disc, Harvard College Observatory Director Professor Leo<br />

Goldberg said. Primary purpose of satellite, to obtain high-resolution<br />

spectral data, had been achieved. Goldberg said that 4,000 uv photos of<br />

the sun, made above earth’s atmosphere, would provide three-dimen-<br />

sional information on sun’s structure, temperature, <strong>and</strong> density, <strong>and</strong> on<br />

how they vary with height. Previously, scientists could study solar flares<br />

only by observing them at the sun’s rim during eclipse. Goldberg said<br />

interpretation of uv photos, still being-transmited to earth, should also<br />

be related to unsolved problems about sun’s chemical composition <strong>and</strong><br />

in turn to theories of sun’s origin <strong>and</strong> evolution. (Weily W Post,<br />

11/26/67, A6; AP, W Star, 11/26/67, A17)<br />

* U.S.S.R. successfully launched Cosmos CXCIII. Orbital parameters :<br />

apogee, 354 km (220 mi) ; perigee, 203 km (127 mi) ; period, 89.9<br />

min; inclination, 65.7’. Satellite reentered Dec. 3. (AP, NYT, 11/26/67,<br />

46; GSFC SSR, 12/15/67)<br />

* National Policy Panel of U.N. Assn. of the U.S.A. published report<br />

“Stopping the Spread of Atomic Weapons.” Report favored proposed<br />

treaty ending spread of nuclear weapons, urged US. to open its peaceful<br />

nuclear reactors to inspection by IAEA, recommended specific interna-<br />

tional facilities <strong>and</strong> arrangements for h<strong>and</strong>ling explosions for peaceful<br />

purposes, asked for a fairer balance between nuclear <strong>and</strong> nonnuclear<br />

nations, <strong>and</strong> called for inclusion of U.N. guarantee (based on US. <strong>and</strong><br />

U.S.S.R. power) against “nuclear blackmail.” Panel report’s “underlying<br />

theme” was that some nations might refuse to sign if the two major<br />

powers avoided treaty terms designed to meet concern of nonnuclear<br />

states that “special units be created wit& International Atomic Energy<br />

Agency to assure that technical, industrial innovations in civilian nuclear<br />

energy be made available on a pooled, non-discriminatory basis.” (Fin-<br />

ney, NYT, 11/26/67,12; Marder, W Post, 11/26/67,1)<br />

* Dr. Jack E. Froehlich, 46-year-old scientist <strong>and</strong> rocket pioneer, was<br />

drowned with his nine-year-old son, Mark, in a boating accident. He<br />

had been president of National Engineering Science Co. <strong>and</strong>, during<br />

1959, had been at JPL as a project manager for Explorer I. (Pasadena<br />

Star-News, 13/27/67]<br />

November 26: U.S.S.R.’s long-held superiority in large boosters had given<br />

it an advantage over US. in nuclear warhead protection, according to<br />

Pentagon sources. The advantage would become significant both offen-<br />

sively <strong>and</strong> defensively because of present developments in ABM de-<br />

fenses-developments designed to destroy incoming warheads in outer<br />

space with intensive x-ray emissions. Soviet scientists could easily<br />

add more shielding to their warheads to halt x-ray bombardments from<br />

U.S. antimissile missiles, article noted, but US. was h<strong>and</strong>icapped by<br />

weight limitations of its lower-thrust boosters. “Some officials,” article<br />

said, “are concerned that the hardness of Russian warheads will lessen<br />

seriously the protective capability of the Pentagon’s planned [ABM sys-<br />

tems] . . . [<strong>and</strong>] that US. offensive missiles now need more protection<br />

. . . to survive Russian anti-missile explosions <strong>and</strong> reach their targets.”<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!